Suped

How does Gmail track email engagement for reputation, including in-email clicks versus landing page visits?

Matthew Whittaker profile picture
Matthew Whittaker
Co-founder & CTO, Suped
Published 8 May 2025
Updated 19 Aug 2025
7 min read
Understanding how Gmail tracks email engagement is fundamental for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and ensuring your messages land in the inbox. It's not just about getting an email opened, but about the quality and depth of interaction users have with your content. This engagement is a critical signal that informs Gmail's sophisticated algorithms about the legitimacy and value of your emails.
A common question arises regarding the impact of in-email clicks versus landing page visits. Both are forms of interaction, but do they carry the same weight in Gmail's eyes when it comes to assessing your domain's reputation? The nuances of how Internet Service Providers (ISPs) track and interpret these actions are crucial for any sender looking to optimize their deliverability.

How Gmail tracks engagement beyond the pixel

Gmail employs a highly advanced tracking system that goes far beyond simple pixel opens. While email tracking software often relies on a 1x1 invisible image pixel to detect opens, Gmail, as the email client itself, has a much deeper insight into user behavior within its interface. They can observe active engagement, even if images are not loaded, or if a user interacts with the email but doesn't explicitly click a tracked link.
Their sophisticated algorithms can detect various signals, including mouse movements, scrolling, time spent reading an email, and even typing within the email (e.g., if a user replies). This comprehensive data collection paints a much richer picture of how a user truly values an email, moving beyond just a click or an open. It’s about understanding the total engagement score for a sender.
This depth of tracking means that relying solely on your email service provider’s (ESP) reported open and click rates might not give you the full picture of how Gmail perceives your engagement. While these metrics are a lower limit of engagement, Gmail's internal data can show much higher engagement levels because they have access to user behaviors that are invisible to external trackers.

In-email clicks versus landing page visits

When it comes to the impact on your sender reputation, both in-email clicks and landing page visits contribute, but they can signal different levels of user intent and value. An in-email click, such as interacting with an interactive email element, indicates direct engagement with the content. However, clicking a link that leads to an external landing page can be seen as a stronger signal.
The act of leaving the email client and navigating to another webpage often implies a higher level of interest and commitment from the recipient. This behavior indicates that the email content was compelling enough to prompt further exploration. Gmail's algorithms likely interpret this as a more significant positive interaction, as it suggests the email provided substantial value or piqued genuine curiosity.
While email link tracking is standard, the subsequent behavior on the landing page, such as time spent, further clicks, or form submissions, can also be implicitly factored into Gmail's reputation assessment. This deeper engagement on an external site (which Google Analytics or similar tools can track) is a strong indicator of user satisfaction and relevance.

In-email clicks

These refer to interactions with elements directly within the email client, such as survey buttons, embedded forms, or interactive content (e.g., AMP for Gmail). They provide an immediate engagement signal without leaving the inbox.

Impact on reputation

While positive, their impact might be slightly less weighted than a visit to an external landing page. They indicate interest in the specific email content, but perhaps not the broader domain or offering.

Tracking fidelity

Your ESP can track these, but Gmail's internal monitoring of active time within the email itself also plays a role in how it perceives this engagement.

Landing page visits

This involves clicking a link in the email that directs the user to an external website or specific landing page. This signifies a user's willingness to invest more time and attention beyond the email itself.

Impact on reputation

Often considered a stronger signal of engagement and content relevance. It suggests a deeper interest in your brand or offering, which positively influences domain reputation.

Tracking fidelity

Tracked via URL parameters (like UTMs) and web analytics. Signals active user behavior beyond the email client.
Therefore, while in-email interactions are certainly beneficial, encouraging clicks that lead to a valuable experience on a landing page is generally a more robust signal for Gmail's reputation assessment. It demonstrates a deeper level of engagement and interest in your content or product.

The broader spectrum of engagement signals

Beyond just clicks, Gmail considers a multitude of positive and negative engagement signals when determining your sender reputation and inbox placement. These signals contribute to a holistic view of how recipients interact with your emails.
Positive signals include actions like replying to an email, forwarding it, adding your address to their contacts, starring or moving an email to a primary inbox (if it landed in promotions or another tab), and even marking an email as not spam. These actions explicitly tell Gmail that the recipient finds your emails valuable.
Conversely, negative signals, such as marking an email as spam (or junk), deleting an email without opening it, or moving it to trash, severely harm your reputation. A high volume of these negative interactions will lead to future emails being delivered to the spam folder or being blocklisted (or blacklisted) entirely.

Key engagement factors for Gmail

  1. Direct replies: When recipients reply to your emails, it's a very strong positive signal for reputation, indicating genuine interest.
  2. Forwards: Forwarding emails to others shows high value and relevance.
  3. Manual inbox actions: Moving an email from a spam folder to the inbox or from Promotions to Primary. This explicitly tells Gmail the email is desired.
  4. Time spent reading: Longer engagement time indicates the content is relevant and valuable to the recipient.
  5. Scroll depth: Scrolling through the email shows the recipient is actively consuming the content.
Therefore, while in-email clicks and landing page visits are important, they are just two pieces of a larger puzzle. Gmail’s objective is to deliver what users want to see, and true engagement is measured by a combination of explicit and implicit signals.

Optimizing for Gmail's reputation algorithm

To effectively improve your Gmail sender reputation, your strategy needs to be multifaceted. It’s not just about prompting a click, but about fostering a genuinely positive and ongoing relationship with your subscribers.
Start by ensuring your content is highly relevant and valuable to your audience. This means segmenting your email list effectively and sending targeted campaigns to users who are most likely to engage. A survey campaign, for example, should be directed at your most engaged subscribers to maximize positive interaction and avoid negative signals.
Furthermore, optimize the post-click experience. If your email links to a landing page, ensure that page is fast-loading, mobile-friendly, and delivers on the promise made in the email. A good user experience after the click reinforces positive engagement signals and contributes to a better sender reputation. Poor landing page experiences can indirectly harm your email standing.
Finally, monitor your Gmail Postmaster Tools data regularly. While it won't show you mouse movements, it provides valuable insights into your sender reputation, spam rates, and delivery errors. This data, combined with your internal ESP metrics, gives you a comprehensive view of your email program's health with Gmail.

Views from the trenches

Best practices
Focus on providing valuable content that encourages natural engagement, not just clicks.
Segment your audience carefully to send highly relevant emails to engaged users.
Optimize landing pages for fast loading and mobile responsiveness.
Encourage replies and forwards by prompting recipients to interact more directly.
Regularly clean your email list to remove inactive or unengaged subscribers.
Common pitfalls
Sending emails with only in-email interaction points, underestimating the value of external clicks.
Neglecting the post-click experience on landing pages, leading to high bounce rates.
Sending engagement campaigns to an unsegmented or disengaged audience.
Over-relying on basic open and click metrics from your ESP for Gmail reputation.
Ignoring negative engagement signals like deletes without opening or spam complaints.
Expert tips
Gmail's algorithms are always evolving, so continuous monitoring and adaptation are key.
Think holistically about engagement; every positive interaction contributes to a better sender score.
While Google claims not to heavily weigh clicks, observed user behavior tells a different story.
True engagement often involves deeper interaction beyond the initial click, such as replies or forwards.
Even if your ESP reports low clicks, Gmail may internally track more subtle interactions.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says having users leave the email and land on a separate page is the most effective way for clicks to be logged reliably and to signal engagement to Gmail, as in-email tools don't always track clicks as promised.
2019-06-26 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says Gmail tracks all user interactions, including opens, even if images are not loaded, and monitors mouse movements, typing, and other in-inbox activities.
2019-06-26 - Email Geeks

Putting engagement into practice

Ultimately, Gmail's tracking of email engagement for reputation is a complex system that looks at the full spectrum of user interaction. While both in-email clicks and landing page visits contribute, the latter often signals a deeper level of interest and commitment, which is highly valued by inbox providers.
Focusing on delivering highly relevant content that prompts genuine, meaningful interactions, whether within the email or on an external landing page, is the best approach. By consistently providing value and observing how your audience truly engages, you can build a strong sender reputation and ensure your emails reach their intended destination.

Frequently asked questions

DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard

What you'll get with Suped

Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing