Do email providers track clicks on verification links versus other links for deliverability?
Matthew Whittaker
Co-founder & CTO, Suped
Published 25 May 2025
Updated 16 Aug 2025
8 min read
When onboarding new subscribers or managing an existing list, a common question arises regarding how email providers view different types of clicks. Specifically, many wonder if there's a distinction in deliverability between a click on a verification link, such as a "confirm subscription" button, and clicks on other links within a welcome series or general marketing emails. This is a crucial point for anyone focused on maintaining a strong sender reputation and ensuring their messages land in the inbox.
The short answer is that email providers, or Internet Service Providers (ISPs), generally do not differentiate between the *type* of link clicked in terms of its content or purpose. Their primary focus is on the overall engagement signals from their users. While they don't granularly classify whether a click was for verification, content, or a product, the act of clicking itself is a positive indicator of user interest.
Mailbox providers (like Gmail or Outlook) are sophisticated in their filtering, but they prioritize the user's interaction with your mail stream. This means whether a user clicks any link, opens the email, moves it out of spam, or replies, these actions contribute to a positive sender reputation. Conversely, marking emails as spam, deleting without opening, or ignoring messages will negatively impact your standing.
How email providers assess engagement
Email providers heavily rely on engagement metrics to gauge the legitimacy and desirability of incoming mail. While they might not delve into the specific semantic meaning of each link, they certainly observe overall click activity. A consistent pattern of users clicking links within your emails signals to the provider that your content is valuable and relevant to their users.
This general engagement data, including clicks, helps them determine your sender reputation. A good reputation leads to better inbox placement, while a poor one can result in your emails being directed to the spam folder or even blocked. Therefore, any click, whether on a verification link or a content link, is generally viewed as a positive engagement signal. You can learn more about how Internet Service Providers track email engagement and its impact on deliverability directly.
It's important to understand that while a click is a positive signal, its impact is part of a larger algorithm. Mailbox providers consider many factors, including sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), bounce rates, spam complaint rates, and the overall quality of your sending list. A single click won't override multiple negative signals.
Furthermore, there's a difference between user-initiated clicks and automated clicks. Some email servers and security systems perform automatic link clicking to scan for malicious content before delivery. These aren't engagement signals but security checks. For more on this, you can look into how free email services click links to check for spam.
The impact of link tracking on deliverability
The use of link tracking, particularly if it involves redirected URLs, can sometimes raise flags with spam filters, especially if the tracking domain doesn't align with the sending domain. This is why it's crucial to implement link tracking carefully.
However, the benefits of understanding user engagement, which link tracking provides, often outweigh these potential drawbacks, provided best practices are followed. For instance, legitimate click tracking helps indicate to email providers that the email content is relevant and not spam. This positive engagement is a strong signal for your sender reputation.
Use clear anchor text: Ensure your link text accurately describes where the user will be directed.
Limit the number of links: Avoid excessive linking, especially in plain text emails, as it can appear spammy.
Maintain domain alignment: Ideally, your tracking domain should align with your sending domain to avoid suspicion. This relates to tracking URL subdomain alignment.
Verification links and user intent
Double opt-in, where users click a verification link to confirm their subscription, is primarily a tool for senders to build a high-quality, engaged email list. It's about confirming explicit consent and reducing the chances of sending to invalid or uninterested addresses. While this process doesn't directly tell an ISP "this is a verification click," the resulting engaged subscriber base positively impacts your long-term deliverability.
When a user goes through the double opt-in process, it demonstrates a strong intent to receive your emails. This leads to higher engagement rates overall, fewer spam complaints, and lower bounce rates. These are all strong positive signals that email providers look for. So, while the click on a verification link isn't singled out, it contributes to the broader pattern of positive user interaction.
The focus for providers is less on the *why* of the click and more on the *that* a click occurred. Any click that genuinely comes from an engaged user is a good click in their eyes, as it signifies active interest in the sender's content. This is also true for other types of links, such as promotional or informational links within a welcome series. The cumulative effect of these positive interactions strengthens your sender reputation.
B2B vs. B2C deliverability nuances
There are some distinctions between how B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer) email filters operate. B2B filters, particularly those associated with corporate email systems, often lean more heavily on established sender reputation, authentication protocols (like DMARC), and less on granular user engagement metrics like specific click rates compared to their B2C counterparts. This doesn't mean clicks are irrelevant, but their weighting in the filtering algorithm might differ.
However, with the increasing sophistication of email security, the lines are blurring. Major B2B providers like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 are incorporating more dynamic and user-centric signals into their filtering, which can include engagement. While they might not track *what* specifically is clicked for privacy reasons, they likely track *if* clicks occur as a general sign of engagement. This applies whether using HTTP links instead of HTTPS, or if the sending domain differs from the click tracking domain.
Ultimately, a holistic approach to email deliverability is always best. Focus on building a clean list, sending relevant content, maintaining proper authentication, and ensuring your emails are consistently engaged with. Whether it's a verification click or a marketing link, any positive interaction helps build a robust sender reputation and improve inbox placement.
B2B email filtering
Focus: Often prioritize authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and overall domain/IP reputation over granular engagement metrics.
Scrutiny: Higher sensitivity to known malicious patterns, phishing attempts, and non-compliance with email standards.
Engagement signals: May track opens and clicks, but less likely to use the *type* of link clicked as a direct deliverability factor.
B2C email filtering
Focus: Heavily rely on individual user engagement, including opens, clicks, replies, and how users interact with emails.
Scrutiny: More sensitive to content, frequency, and direct user feedback (e.g., 'mark as spam' complaints).
Maintain a clean, engaged list. Regularly remove inactive or unengaged subscribers.
Implement proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for all sending domains.
Use clear and concise calls to action for all links within your emails.
Common pitfalls
Assuming all clicks are treated equally without considering the overall context of engagement.
Over-reliance on click tracking without considering other crucial deliverability factors.
Sending emails to unverified lists, which can lead to high bounce and complaint rates.
Expert tips
Focus on user permission and engagement, as these are the strongest signals to mailbox providers.
Double opt-in primarily benefits the sender by ensuring a high-quality list.
While specific click types aren't tracked, the overall click activity indicates user desire for your mail.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that understanding and classifying individual emails is too granular for most providers to track specific link types.
2021-08-10 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks says that email providers don't care about the specific type of link clicked; they are more concerned with whether users want the mail.
2021-08-10 - Email Geeks
Key takeaways for deliverability
In summary, email providers do not typically distinguish between clicks on verification links and other types of links for deliverability purposes. Their algorithms are focused on the broader picture of user engagement. Any click, whether it's to confirm a subscription or access content, is generally interpreted as a positive signal indicating that the recipient finds the email valuable and wishes to interact with it.
This means that while double opt-in is a fantastic practice for list hygiene and consent management, its deliverability benefit comes from cultivating an engaged, permission-based audience, rather than the specific nature of the click itself being weighted differently. Your strategy should prioritize overall positive user experience, list quality, and consistent engagement across all your email interactions to ensure optimal inbox placement.