Does Google Postmaster Tools (GPT) data include Google Workspace accounts, or only Gmail.com accounts?

Key findings

• Expanded scope: Google Postmaster Tools now provides data for both Gmail.com and Google Workspace recipient accounts.
• Reputation metrics: Domain and IP reputation data in GPT specifically incorporates insights from Google Workspace recipients, which is particularly vital for B2B senders.
• Comprehensive data: Many users report observing full data population across various metrics, including spam rate and delivery errors, for their B2B traffic to Workspace domains.
• Documentation shift: Google’s own documentation has either been updated or specific references limiting data to gmail.com have been removed, aligning with the observed data. For more, see Iterable's discussion on GPT.

Key considerations

• Sufficient volume: Data for Workspace accounts will only appear in GPT if there is sufficient email volume being sent to these recipients.
• Historical context: Previous information (pre-pandemic) often indicated GPT was exclusively for gmail.com, highlighting a significant evolution in Google's data offerings.
• Data ownership: The reason for previous limitations was often cited as data ownership contractual clauses, suggesting a potential change in Google’s policy or interpretation.
• Full suite of metrics: While reputation is confirmed to include Workspace data, it's advisable to monitor all dashboards (spam rate, delivery errors, feedback loop) to understand the full extent of Workspace data inclusion for your specific sending patterns.

Key opinions

• Unexpected data: Many marketers initially believed GPT was solely for gmail.com accounts, making the appearance of Google Workspace data surprising yet welcome.
• B2B implications: This expanded scope is particularly valuable for senders primarily focused on B2B email traffic, as it allows them to monitor deliverability to key clients effectively. Learn more in our ultimate guide to Google Postmaster Tools.
• Full dashboard activity: Some users report seeing all GPT dashboards (IP reputation, spam rate, delivery errors) populated for their Google Workspace recipients, indicating comprehensive coverage.
• Speculation on changes: Marketers speculate that Google's changes to G Suite contracts or the discontinuation of legacy accounts might be related to the increased data availability, as detailed by Nearview Media.

Key considerations

• Volume thresholds: Even with Workspace inclusion, sufficient sending volume to those domains remains crucial for data to populate consistently in GPT.
• Verification efforts: Marketers are actively seeking further confirmation or official documentation to fully understand the current and future scope of Google Workspace data in GPT.
• Impact on strategy: The expanded data influences how marketers monitor and optimize their email campaigns targeting Google Workspace users, potentially leading to more refined strategies based on domain reputation insights.
• Evolving understanding: Marketers acknowledge that Google's tools and data policies are dynamic, requiring continuous monitoring and adaptation to new information.

Key opinions

• Google confirmation: A Google employee has directly confirmed that domain reputation data within GPT does include insights from Google Workspace customers.
• Specific data points: While domain reputation is explicitly confirmed, other data types might not be included for Workspace, indicating selective data sharing based on Google's internal policies.
• Historical context matters: Older information regarding data limitations for Google Workspace accounts in GPT may no longer be accurate due to Google's evolving policies over time, as sometimes explained by experts at Word to the Wise.
• Shared IP reputation: Experts note instances where senders using shared IPs (e.g., Amazon) seem to share IP reputation data in GPT, suggesting broader data aggregation beyond individual domains. This is part of how Google Postmaster Tools tracks domain reputation.

Key considerations

• Data ownership constraints: The reason for previous data exclusion (beyond reputation) was often cited as data ownership not belonging to Google for Workspace accounts, which may still apply to certain metrics.
• Evolving policies: Google’s data policies and what is shared via GPT are subject to change, requiring ongoing validation from the community and Google itself.
• Verification beyond reputation: Senders should verify if all Postmaster Tools dashboards, such as IP reputation data, spam rate, and delivery errors, consistently populate data from Workspace accounts, or if it's primarily reputation metrics.
• Indirect influences: Experts consider how factors like mail forwarding from Workspace accounts to personal Gmail accounts might indirectly contribute to the reputation data observed in GPT.

Key findings

• Broad user definition: Google’s sender guidelines explicitly define a 'Gmail user' to include individuals with both @gmail.com accounts and Google Workspace accounts.
• Implication for GPT: This broad definition suggests that data collected for tools like GPT would inherently apply to both types of users, reflecting actual recipient behavior.
• Absence of explicit limitation: Current GPT documentation does not seem to contain specific disclaimers limiting data exclusively to @gmail.com recipients.
• Unified ecosystem: The documentation reflects Google’s unified approach to email delivery and spam filtering across its various mail services, affecting feedback loop spam rates.

Key considerations

• Historical context: Users should be aware that past documentation might have presented different information, leading to common misconceptions about GPT's scope.
• Interpretive nuances: While the definition of a 'Gmail user' is broad, specific metrics within GPT might still have varying levels of data granularity for each account type.
• Ongoing updates: Google frequently updates its guidelines, making it essential to consult the most recent versions for accurate information regarding tools and data, especially when tracking email spam placement.
• Impact on compliance: Senders adhering to Google's general sender guidelines are effectively also optimizing for Google Workspace deliverability, as the data is integrated.