Summary
For email senders with small lists (e.g., 100 contacts sent weekly), the conventional wisdom around domain warming is often misapplied. While domain warming is crucial for establishing sender reputation with high-volume sending, it’s generally not a significant concern for very low volumes, especially if the domain is already a month old. Issues encountered by senders in such scenarios are more likely attributable to broader factors like problematic shared sending infrastructure (e.g., a CRM with abusive users) rather than the absence of a dedicated warming process for a minimal list.
Key findings
- Low volume threshold: Sending around 100 emails per week is typically too low to require a formal domain warming process, as it does not constitute bulk email sending in the eyes of most internet service providers (ISPs).
- Domain age matters: If a new domain is already over 30 days old, the need for warming diminishes significantly for small list sizes.
- CRM impact: Problems with deliverability at low volumes are often linked to the reputation of the shared sending platform (e.g., a CRM or ESP) if it has been used by spammers or bad actors.
- Statistical noise: For very small volumes like 100 emails, deliverability metrics are largely statistical noise, making traditional warming less impactful than for large lists.
Key considerations
- Proper setup: Ensure your new domain has essential DNS records such as MX records and a functional website, even if it redirects. For a comprehensive guide, review our advice on technical solutions for deliverability.
- Avoiding warming services: Be cautious of third-party domain warming tools, as some may violate ESP terms of service and potentially harm your sender reputation.
- Proactive whitelisting: Consider sending a whitelisting campaign to your existing contacts, informing them of the new sending domain and asking them to add it to their address books. This can significantly boost deliverability. Learn more about email best practices for warm up.
- Understand domain reputation: Focus on maintaining a good sending reputation through consistent engagement and clean list practices, which is more impactful than forced warming for small volumes. For insights, read our guide on understanding your email domain reputation.
What email marketers say
Email marketers often debate the necessity of domain warming, especially when dealing with smaller lists or migrating domains. While some have experienced unexpected flagging even with low volumes, a common sentiment is that traditional warming practices, often involving third-party tools, are generally overkill and potentially counterproductive for small list sizes. Their experiences highlight the importance of understanding the specific context of their sending environment, such as the reputation of their CRM or ESP, over blindly applying warming strategies.
Key opinions
- Manual warming preference: Many marketers prefer to manually warm up domains by sending slowly and gradually increasing volume, rather than relying on automated tools.
- Low volume exception: For small lists (e.g., 100 emails per week), domain warming is often deemed unnecessary, particularly if the domain is not brand new (less than 30 days old).
- CRM/ESP reputation: Unexpected deliverability issues with small volumes may point to problems with the sending platform (CRM or ESP) being used by problematic senders, rather than the user's own sending practices.
- Scam prevalence: There's a recognized issue with 'scammy' or ineffective warming tools in the digital marketing space that mislead users.
Key considerations
- Volume assessment: Carefully assess your sending volume. If you're sending hundreds, not thousands, traditional warming protocols might not apply.
- Domain and website prerequisites: Always ensure your domain has an MX record and a functional website. This foundational setup is important for all sending. For example, Omnisend suggests preparing your email warmup for successful campaigns.
- CRM/ESP vetting: If you're using a SaaS platform or CRM for sending, investigate its reputation and how it manages other senders, as this can directly impact your deliverability, regardless of your volume. This is especially true for migrating to a new ESP.
- Focus on legitimacy: Real domain warming involves building reputation with real customers and real content, not simply blasting emails to a warming service. For insights into common deliverability problems, see why your emails go to spam.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks indicates they want to change their company sending domain for newsletters and has used IPWarmup and MailReach but is not impressed with them. They are looking for suggestions for the best warmup tool for new domains, particularly for an existing list.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks clarifies that they want to change the domain for their current newsletter, which is for a list they already possess. This suggests they are not starting with a cold list but rather migrating an existing one to a new domain.
What the experts say
Deliverability experts largely agree that for very small email lists, the traditional concept of domain warming is often misapplied or entirely unnecessary. They emphasize that actual warming is about gradually building trust with ISPs for high-volume sending, not about low, infrequent sends. The consensus points to issues arising more from the underlying infrastructure or a domain's newness (under 30 days) rather than the absence of a 'warming service' for minimal volumes. Many warn against using third-party warming tools, labeling them as ineffective or even harmful.
Key opinions
- No warming for low volume: For lists of 100 people sent weekly, a formal warming process is typically not required, especially if the domain is more than 30 days old.
- Warming for thousands: Warming becomes a consideration when sending volumes reach into the thousands or tens of thousands of emails.
- Automated tools criticized: Many third-party 'warming services' are viewed as ineffective or 'snake oil' and may even violate terms of service, potentially harming deliverability.
- Real warming defined: True domain warming involves gradually increasing legitimate volume to real, engaged customers from your actual ESP, not sending to a network of disposable accounts.
- Focus on root cause: If low volumes are flagged, the issue likely stems from the sending infrastructure (e.g., a CRM abused by spammers) rather than the volume itself.
Key considerations
- Volume is key: Domain reputation for bulk mail is based on statistics. For very low volumes, individual sends are statistically insignificant, meaning traditional warming has little impact.
- Verify ESP behavior: If an ESP flags low volumes (e.g., 100 emails), it's unusual and suggests a deeper issue with how that ESP monitors or flags accounts, possibly due to a history of abuse on their shared infrastructure, rather than your specific sending. Mailgun has discussed domain warming and reputation.
- Focus on authentic engagement: The most effective 'warming' is to send valuable content to an engaged, opted-in list, regardless of its size. For best practices, consider warming a domain for cold contacts.
- Crowdsourced whitelisting: Implement campaigns that encourage contacts to add your new 'From' address to their address book. This directly improves inbox placement and sender reputation, providing a significant deliverability boost, especially from major mailbox providers.
- Beware of scams: Be wary of tools that promise rapid or automatic warming, as they might be violating terms of service or engaging in practices that could blacklist your domain. For further reading, understand how email blacklists work.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks states that the most effective warming strategy is to send slowly and maintain low volumes initially, building reputation organically rather than relying on automated tools that claim to do it for you. This approach prioritizes genuine engagement over artificial volume.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks asserts that if a domain is less than 30 days old, a list of 100 recipients will not require any warming whatsoever. This highlights that domain age, in conjunction with volume, dictates the necessity of warming.
What the documentation says
Official documentation and guides from email service providers (ESPs) and industry resources typically define domain warming as a systematic process for new domains to establish a positive sending reputation by gradually increasing email volume. This is primarily aimed at high-volume senders to avoid triggering spam filters. For small lists, the emphasis often shifts from aggressive volume ramp-up to ensuring proper technical setup and maintaining positive sender metrics from the outset. Many resources underscore that legitimate engagement is the true foundation of a healthy sending reputation.
Key findings
- Gradual increase: Domain warming involves a measured increase in email sending volume over time to build trust with ISPs.
- Reputation building: The core purpose of warming is to establish a good sender reputation, signalling to mailbox providers that the domain is a legitimate sender.
- Risk of immediate high volume: Sending high volumes immediately from a new domain is flagged by ISPs as suspicious activity.
- Domain vs. IP warming: Domain warming is almost always necessary for new domains, whereas IP warming is specific to new dedicated IPs. This highlights that warming a domain on an existing IP is still a consideration.
Key considerations
- List quality: Always send to opted-in contacts during the warming phase and beyond. This is critical for establishing a positive reputation.
- Patience is key: Most domains can be fully warmed up within 3-6 weeks, but larger lists may require up to 3 months. For a small list, this timeline might be shorter, but consistency is still important. Read more about recovering domain reputation.
- Monitoring metrics: Monitor deliverability metrics such as open rates, click-through rates, and complaint rates. Positive engagement helps build reputation. Tools like iContact provide essential guides on warming.
- Consistent sending: Maintain a consistent sending schedule once warming begins, as irregular sending can also negatively impact reputation. This is especially true when considering a domain warming strategy for small lists.
Technical article
Documentation from SendLayer states that new email domains require warming up, similar to new IP addresses, before large email volumes are sent. This process helps to build a sender reputation and ensure deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from iContact states that domain warming is the process of gradually increasing the volume of emails sent from a new domain over time. This systematic approach is essential for establishing a favorable domain reputation with mailbox providers.
Related resources
14 resources
Related pages
What is the best practice for warming up a new email sending domain for a small list of cold contacts?
What is the best domain warming strategy for a small email list?
Is email warmup necessary for sending cold emails from a new domain?
Do I need to warm up my email list of 100k contacts?
Email deliverability issues: getting your messages to the inbox in 2025
Why your emails are going to spam in 2024 and how to fix it
How to improve domain reputation using google postmaster tools [2025 guide]
A practical guide to understanding your email domain reputation
Do I need to warm up a new domain for a small email list?
