Is a notification email about a failed transaction considered transactional and CASL compliant?
Matthew Whittaker
Co-founder & CTO, Suped
Published 17 May 2025
Updated 15 Aug 2025
8 min read
When a customer attempts a transaction online and it fails, it's crucial to inform them promptly. The question often arises: is a notification email about a failed transaction considered transactional, and does it comply with regulations like Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)? This distinction is vital because transactional emails typically have different consent requirements compared to commercial or marketing messages. Misclassifying an email can lead to significant compliance issues, including hefty fines and damage to sender reputation.
My goal here is to clarify this grey area, particularly concerning failed transaction notifications and their CASL compliance. We will explore what defines a transactional email under anti-spam laws and how to ensure your communications remain compliant while effectively informing your customers. Understanding these nuances is key to maintaining good email deliverability and respecting recipient privacy.
What defines a transactional email?
The primary purpose of an email determines its classification as transactional or commercial. A transactional email facilitates, completes, or confirms a commercial transaction that the recipient has already agreed to or initiated. This is different from a commercial electronic message (CEM), which aims to encourage participation in a commercial activity, such as purchasing a product or service.
For an email to be truly transactional, its content must be directly related to an ongoing or past interaction. Examples include order confirmations, shipping updates, password resets, account statements, and legal notices. The focus is on providing information essential to the user's relationship with your service or product, rather than promoting new offers or encouraging a sale.
A notification email about a failed transaction fits this definition because it communicates essential information about an initiated commercial activity that did not conclude as expected. The recipient was actively involved in an attempt to transact, and they need to be informed of the outcome. This message addresses an expected interaction, providing critical details about a service interruption or an unresolved issue directly related to the user's action.
The key is that the user triggered this communication. They attempted to make a purchase, and the system is responding directly to that action. This makes it a direct consequence of their interaction, distinguishing it from an unsolicited promotional message, which would require explicit consent.
Understanding CASL and its exceptions
Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) is one of the strictest anti-spam laws globally, requiring explicit consent before sending commercial electronic messages. However, CASL provides specific exemptions for certain types of messages, including those considered transactional or related to an existing business relationship. This is where the classification of a failed transaction email becomes critical.
Under CASL, messages that solely provide information about a transaction, account, or relationship do not require prior consent, provided they do not contain promotional content. The legislation focuses heavily on the "primary purpose" of the email. If the main goal is informational and directly tied to a user-initiated activity, it typically falls under an exemption, as confirmed by the CRTC's FAQs.
It is important to differentiate this from implied consent, which applies when a customer has an existing business relationship or makes an inquiry. While implied consent can allow for some commercial messages, explicit consent is generally preferred for marketing. For transactional emails, the direct relationship to a user action often bypasses the strict consent requirements for CEMs. Our article Does CASL apply to emails sent from outside Canada provides further insight into geographical applicability.
A critical caveat exists: if any part of the email promotes other products, services, or seeks to encourage new commercial activity, it may be reclassified as a commercial message and thus fall under CASL's consent requirements. This is where careful content crafting is essential to maintain transactional status. Our article on legal and deliverability implications of promotional content provides more detail.
Applying CASL to failed transaction notifications
Based on the "primary purpose" rule, a notification email about a failed transaction should be considered transactional and CASL compliant, even if the recipient is not otherwise subscribed to your marketing emails. The core reason for sending this email is to inform the user about an issue with a specific action they initiated. It is a system message, not a marketing pitch.
The concern that it might seem like an "abandoned cart" email is understandable, as both relate to an incomplete transaction. However, the intent is different. An abandoned cart email is often designed to persuade the user to complete a purchase, typically including incentives or product reminders, making it commercial. A failed transaction notification, however, informs them that their attempt failed and they were not charged, focusing on the technical outcome. You can learn more about this distinction in our article When does transactional email become commercial.
To maintain its transactional status, the content must be strictly informational. It should clearly state that the transaction failed, why it failed (if known and appropriate), and what the user needs to do next, for example, try again, update payment information, or contact support. Any elements that could be construed as promotional, such as cross-sells, upsells, or links to unrelated products, must be omitted.
Consider a scenario where customers thought they completed a purchase but payment did not process. Notifying them of the failure and offering a clear path to resolution is not only a service to the customer but also a necessary communication for a legitimate business relationship. It prevents confusion and potential negative customer experiences, improving overall trust and adherence to regulations.
Key considerations for compliance
Ensuring compliance for failed transaction notifications goes beyond merely classifying them as transactional. It involves adhering to best practices that safeguard your sender reputation and ensure deliverability. Separate sending infrastructure for transactional and marketing emails is a common recommendation, as discussed in our guide on separate authentication for bulk emails.
Warning: Avoid promotional creep
Be extremely cautious about including any content that could be interpreted as promotional. Even subtle links to your website's main page (if it is heavily commercial), social media icons, or mentions of other products can jeopardize the email's transactional classification under CASL. When it comes to failed transaction notifications, less is often more on the content side.
Content focus: Keep the email solely focused on the failed transaction. Clearly state the transaction failure and its implications, provide actionable next steps, and include absolutely no marketing content or special offers.
Sender identification: Always clearly identify your organization as the sender using a recognizable "From" address.
Contact information: Include a valid physical mailing address and an accessible contact method within the email.
No unsubscribe link needed: Transactional emails do not legally require an unsubscribe mechanism under CASL. Adding one can sometimes confuse recipients and potentially impact deliverability, though some senders include a general "manage preferences" link.
Timeliness: Send these notifications as soon as the failure occurs. Promptness reinforces the transactional nature and helps resolve issues quickly.
Monitoring your email program is also crucial. Regularly monitoring your email deliverability and sender reputation helps catch issues early. Being blocklisted (or blacklisted) can impact all your email streams, including critical transactional ones. Our blocklist checker can help monitor for potential issues and understand how email blacklists actually work.
Transactional emails
Purpose: To facilitate, complete, or confirm a user-initiated transaction.
Consent: Generally exempt from explicit consent under CASL if purely informational.
Content: No promotional material, focused strictly on the transaction.
Commercial emails (CEMs)
Purpose: To encourage participation in a commercial activity, e.g., sales.
Consent: Requires express (opt-in) or implied consent under CASL.
Content: Includes promotions, advertisements, calls to action.
Finally, ensure you keep robust records of all consent obtained and the triggers for your transactional emails. This documentation is critical for demonstrating compliance if ever audited. Following these guidelines helps ensure your transactional emails are not only CASL compliant but also effective in reaching your customers.
Views from the trenches
Best practices
Ensure the email's subject line clearly indicates a system notification about a transaction.
Use a dedicated IP address or sender domain for transactional emails to protect reputation.
Test the content carefully to ensure no accidental promotional phrasing is included.
Provide clear instructions on how the user can resolve the failed transaction.
Log all transactional email sends for audit and compliance purposes.
Common pitfalls
Including links to marketing pages or banners in the transactional notification.
Failing to explain why the transaction failed, leading to user frustration.
Sending multiple follow-ups without user action, risking reclassification as spam.
Not using a consistent and recognizable "From" address for all transactional emails.
Ignoring potential deliverability issues that could prevent critical notifications from arriving.
Expert tips
Implement DMARC to protect your domain from spoofing, which can impact transactional emails.
Monitor DMARC reports regularly for insights into email authentication and delivery.
Consider using a transactional email service provider with robust deliverability features.
Regularly audit your email content for compliance with changing regulations like CASL.
Keep records of user actions that trigger transactional emails.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says a notification about a failed transaction is absolutely legitimate to send, especially since people expect to be informed about initiated processes.
November 6, 2020 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says a message informing customers their payment did not process and they were not charged would be transactional if properly worded, as it is a system error message.
November 6, 2020 - Email Geeks
Maintaining trust and compliance
A notification email about a failed transaction is indeed considered transactional and can be CASL compliant, provided its primary purpose is informational and directly relates to the user's initiated activity. The key differentiator is the absence of any promotional content. By focusing strictly on informing the recipient about the transaction status and offering a path to resolution, you can meet compliance requirements while maintaining customer trust.
Adhering to best practices for transactional email, such as separating sending infrastructure and meticulous content review, further strengthens your compliance posture and improves deliverability. This ensures that crucial communications reach your customers, even if they have not explicitly opted into your marketing list. For deeper insights, consider our article on email deliverability strategies for legally obligated emails.