The landscape of email deliverability has shifted significantly, especially with major mailbox providers like Yahoo (and its subsidiary, AOL) implementing stricter email authentication requirements. Many senders, particularly those using Email Service Providers (ESPs) like Mailgun, are now asking if DMARC records are mandatory. It's a critical question because failing to comply can lead to email delivery issues, including messages being rejected or sent to spam folders. I often hear this question from clients navigating these new rules.
While DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) has long been a recommended best practice for email security, its status has evolved from optional to essential for many. This change is primarily driven by an industry-wide push to combat email abuse like phishing and spoofing. Understanding these new mandates and how they interact with your chosen email sending platform is key to maintaining high deliverability rates.
For bulk senders, those sending over 5,000 emails per day to Yahoo or Gmail addresses, DMARC is indeed required. This isn't just a strong recommendation anymore, it's a hard requirement that began in February 2024. If you fall into this category, having a valid DMARC record published in your DNS is non-negotiable for consistent inbox placement. Failure to do so will severely impact your email deliverability, leading to significant message rejections or direct placement into spam.
Even for senders below the 5,000 email per day threshold, Yahoo and Gmail still strongly advise implementing DMARC. While not strictly mandated for these lower volumes, it significantly improves your email's trustworthiness and helps protect your domain from impersonation. Most email providers use DMARC to verify the authenticity of incoming messages, so its absence can still trigger spam filters.
The initial DMARC policy requirement set by these providers allows for a p=none policy. This policy instructs receiving mail servers to simply report on messages that fail DMARC checks, without actively quarantining or rejecting them. This provides a grace period for senders to understand their email streams and ensure proper authentication before moving to stricter policies. However, it's important to remember that this p=none allowance may not last indefinitely, as the trend is towards stronger enforcement over time.
Mailbox providers like Yahoo have explicitly stated their DMARC requirements for bulk senders. They expect both SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) to be properly configured and aligned with your sending domain. DMARC acts as an overarching policy that leverages these two authentication methods to determine how unauthenticated email should be handled. It's crucial to have all three in place for optimal deliverability.
Mailgun's stance on DMARC
Mailgun, as an email service provider (ESP), does not inherently require you to have a DMARC record to use their platform. However, they, along with other reputable ESPs, strongly advocate for its implementation. Their goal is to help you achieve the best possible deliverability, and given the new mandates from major mailbox providers, DMARC is now an integral part of that equation. I often emphasize to users that while the ESP might not enforce it, the recipients' mail servers certainly will.
To ensure your emails sent via Mailgun reach their intended recipients at Yahoo, Gmail, and other major providers, you must ensure your domain is properly authenticated. This involves setting up SPF and DKIM records specific to Mailgun's sending infrastructure, and then layering DMARC on top. Mailgun provides guidance on configuring these foundational authentication records.
Here's a breakdown of how Mailgun's recommendations align with the broader industry requirements:
Mailgun's perspective: They don't strictly block sending without DMARC. Their primary focus is on providing a robust platform. However, they are actively urging users to adopt DMARC due to external pressure from mailbox providers. They understand that not all customers can implement DMARC instantly, so they avoid platform-level restrictions based on it.
Your responsibility: As the sender, you are ultimately responsible for configuring your DNS records, including DMARC, to meet the requirements of the receiving mail servers. Mailgun facilitates your sending, but domain authentication is managed at your DNS provider.
Think of it this way: Mailgun is like the postal service for your emails. They'll carry your mail, but if the recipient (like Yahoo Mail) has a specific rule about how the envelope must be sealed (authenticated), you need to follow that rule for your mail to be accepted. For more on the role of DMARC in deliverability, read Is DMARC required for mail sending domains?.
Implementing DMARC with Mailgun for Yahoo and Google
Implementing DMARC involves adding a TXT record to your domain's DNS. This record specifies your DMARC policy, which dictates how receiving servers should handle emails that fail authentication. For senders using Mailgun, the process involves ensuring that your SPF and DKIM records are correctly set up and aligned with your sending domain, as these are the foundational authentication methods DMARC relies upon.
A basic DMARC record to start with, especially for compliance with initial Yahoo and Google requirements, often looks like this:
This p=none policy allows you to collect DMARC reports without impacting email delivery. These reports provide invaluable insights into who is sending email on behalf of your domain, including legitimate mail and any fraudulent attempts. For examples of DMARC records and policies, see our DMARC record and policy examples guide.
After establishing a p=none policy and analyzing your reports, you can gradually move to stricter policies like p=quarantine or p=reject. These policies instruct receiving servers to either place unauthenticated emails in the spam folder or reject them entirely. This progression is crucial for maximizing protection against spoofing and ensuring that only authorized emails from your domain reach inboxes. Here's a comparison of initial and stricter DMARC policies:
Initial policy
Policy: p=none
Impact: Receiving servers will simply monitor and report on emails that fail SPF or DKIM alignment. No direct impact on email delivery, but provides visibility into authentication issues. This is the minimum requirement for bulk senders by Google and Yahoo.
Stricter policies
Policy: p=quarantine or p=reject
Impact: p=quarantine tells servers to send unauthenticated emails to spam. p=reject tells them to reject these emails outright, preventing them from reaching the inbox at all. This offers the strongest protection against spoofing and strengthens your domain's reputation. Moving to these policies should only happen after careful analysis of DMARC reports.
Ensuring DMARC alignment and proper configuration is key. This means that the domains used in your SPF and DKIM authentication must align with the From domain that your recipients see. Misconfigurations can lead to legitimate emails failing DMARC checks, even with a p=none policy. Regularly monitoring DMARC reports is essential to identify and fix any issues quickly.
Views from the trenches
Best practices
Always start with a DMARC policy of p=none to monitor your email traffic without impacting delivery.
Analyze DMARC reports regularly to identify legitimate email sources and potential spoofing attempts.
Ensure SPF and DKIM records are correctly set up and aligned with your sending domain for proper DMARC pass.
Common pitfalls
Publishing a strict DMARC policy (p=quarantine or p=reject) too early without proper monitoring and adjustments.
Failing to align SPF and DKIM authentication with the From: domain, causing legitimate emails to fail DMARC.
Neglecting to monitor DMARC reports, thus missing vital insights into authentication failures and potential abuse.
Expert tips
For Mailgun users, double-check that your custom sending domain is properly configured and verified, ensuring SPF and DKIM align with your Mailgun setup.
If using subdomains for different email streams, implement DMARC for each, or use a wildcard DMARC record to cover all subdomains.
Consider using a DMARC reporting service to aggregate and analyze your DMARC XML reports, making them easier to understand and act upon.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks says that Mailgun's stance on DMARC is to strongly push customers to add DMARC because of the requirements from mailbox providers, even if Mailgun itself doesn't restrict the platform without it.
2024-01-23 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks clarified that the statement 'While it has not been explicitly stated that a DMARC record is required...' is false because Yahoo has explicitly stated its DMARC requirements.
2024-01-23 - Email Geeks
The importance of DMARC for email deliverability
In summary, while Mailgun may not technically block your sending without a DMARC record, the new requirements from major mailbox providers like Yahoo and Gmail effectively make DMARC a necessity, particularly for bulk email senders. Ignoring these requirements will almost certainly lead to your emails being marked as spam or rejected outright, severely impacting your deliverability and communication efforts.
It is always a wise decision to implement DMARC, even if you are not currently a bulk sender. Starting with a p=none policy allows you to gain valuable insights into your email authentication status and protect your domain reputation proactively. Ensuring robust email authentication is a foundational element of effective email marketing and communication in today's digital landscape.
For ongoing compliance and to avoid potential deliverability issues, I recommend continuously monitoring your DMARC reports and periodically reviewing your domain's authentication settings. This proactive approach will help you adapt to evolving sender requirements and maintain a strong email sending reputation, ensuring your messages consistently reach the inbox.
Yahoo Mail) has a specific rule about how the envelope must be sealed (authenticated), you need to follow that rule for your mail to be accepted. For more on the role of DMARC in deliverability, read Is DMARC required for mail sending domains?.
Google and 
Yahoo.
