Understanding what constitutes an acceptable email bounce rate is crucial for maintaining good sender reputation and ensuring your messages reach their intended recipients. A bounce occurs when an email cannot be delivered to the recipient's server, but not all bounces are created equal. They generally fall into two categories: hard bounces and soft bounces, each with distinct implications for your email marketing efforts. The industry benchmark for an acceptable email bounce rate primarily refers to hard bounces, as these indicate permanent delivery failures.
Key findings
Hard bounce ceiling: The generally accepted ceiling for hard bounces is 2%, with some experts suggesting a target of 1% or less for bad address issues. Exceeding this benchmark can significantly impact your sender reputation.
Soft bounce nature: Soft bounces are temporary delivery failures. While they are a normal part of email sending, persistently high soft bounce rates can indicate underlying problems such as a recipient's inbox being full or server issues. You can read more about soft bounce tolerance.
Classification differences: There isn't a universally standardized definition for hard and soft bounces across all ISPs and email service providers (ESPs). Some ESPs may even classify repeated soft bounces as hard bounces to facilitate list cleaning. This means understanding your specific ESP's bounce handling is important.
Industry impact: Acceptable bounce rates can vary by industry, especially in sectors where recipient email addresses change frequently, like the healthcare sector. This necessitates adaptive list management strategies.
Key considerations
List hygiene: Regularly cleaning your email list to remove hard bounces is paramount for maintaining good deliverability and avoiding wasted sending efforts.
Monitoring soft bounces: While soft bounces are temporary, a sudden spike or sustained high rate warrants investigation as it could signal larger deliverability problems. Effective soft bounce management is key.
Acquisition strategies: Focus on permission-based list growth (opt-in) to minimize the risk of collecting invalid or low-engagement email addresses, which are common causes of hard bounces. Avoid acquiring email addresses from third parties unless proper consent is verified.
Deliverability impact: Both types of bounces, if not managed, can collectively harm your overall email deliverability and lead to blocklisting (or blacklisting).
What email marketers say
Email marketers generally agree that the 2% bounce rate benchmark primarily applies to hard bounces. They acknowledge that soft bounces are a normal part of email sending, but emphasize the importance of monitoring them for spikes or sustained high rates. Many marketers also face unique challenges based on their industry, which can affect their bounce rates and require tailored list management strategies. Maintaining a clean list and understanding the nuances of bounce classification are recurring themes.
Key opinions
Hard bounce focus: The common 2% bounce rate ceiling is specifically for hard bounces, not soft bounces. Hard bounces signify permanent failures that indicate list quality issues.
Soft bounce variability: Soft bounces are more complex and depend on the situation. While normal, a sustained elevated soft bounce rate or sudden spike warrants investigation.
Industry-specific challenges: Bounce rates can vary significantly across industries due to factors like how frequently recipient email addresses change. This makes a universal acceptable rate challenging to apply strictly.
No universal definition: There isn't an industry-standard definition for hard and soft bounces, with ISPs classifying them differently.
Key considerations
Actionable soft bounces: Marketers should track soft bounces and implement a threshold for dropping contacts, as persistent soft bounces can eventually be treated as hard bounces by ESPs or indicate a larger deliverability issue. Learn more about how to manage hard and soft bounces.
Scalable data management: Manually looking up updated contact information for bounces is not scalable for large lists. Marketers need automated or systematic approaches to keep contact data current.
Acquisition risks: Acquiring email addresses from third parties or non-opt-in methods (even through institutional partnerships) carries significant risk of spam complaints and damage to delivery and domain reputation.
Auditing ESP handling: Marketers should be aware of how their specific ESP records and processes soft bounces, as some may not even show soft bounce records unless they repeatedly occur and are then categorized as hard bounces.
Marketer view
An email marketer from Email Geeks suggests that the 2% bounce rate ceiling usually applies only to hard bounces. They explain that soft bounces are a natural occurrence during email sending, but issues with bad addresses point to deeper list problems.
04 Dec 2019 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
An email marketer from Mailchimp notes that soft bounces generally point to a temporary delivery issue and are handled differently than hard bounces. When an email soft bounces, Mailchimp manages it accordingly.
04 Dec 2023 - Mailchimp
What the experts say
Experts in email deliverability emphasize that a low hard bounce rate is critical for sender reputation. They caution that while soft bounces are part of normal operations, a high volume can signal underlying problems. The nuance of bounce classification by different ISPs is also a key point, meaning senders need to understand the specifics of their sending environment. Effective list acquisition and hygiene practices are consistently highlighted as fundamental to managing bounces and protecting deliverability.
Key opinions
Hard bounces are paramount: A low hard bounce rate, ideally 1% or less, is a strong indicator of good list health and is crucial for maintaining a positive sender reputation. These are permanent failures that must be addressed promptly.
Soft bounce indicators: While soft bounces are temporary, a high soft bounce rate could indicate issues like content filtering, recipient server problems, or even a precursor to being blocklisted.
Contextual analysis: Analyzing bounces requires a contextual approach, as the reasons behind them can vary widely. Understanding specific SMTP error codes helps in diagnostics. You can learn more about 4xx mail errors.
Impact on deliverability: High bounce rates, especially hard bounces, signal poor list quality and can lead to emails being sent to spam folders or rejected outright by mailbox providers. This affects your overall deliverability.
Key considerations
Proactive list management: Implement robust practices for list acquisition and regular cleaning to prevent bounces. This includes double opt-in processes and validation services.
Understanding ESP behavior: Recognize that your ESP's internal logic for categorizing and suppressing bounces can differ, influencing the bounce data you see and how it impacts your sending.
Reputation implications: Even seemingly minor issues like consistently hitting over-quota mailboxes (a type of soft bounce) can negatively affect your sender reputation over time.
Avoid sending to invalid addresses: Never resend to addresses that have hard bounced, as this is a clear signal of a bad address and will further damage your reputation.
Expert view
A deliverability expert from SpamResource states that hard bounces for 'bad address' reasons should ideally be kept at or below a 1% rate. This low threshold is crucial for maintaining optimal deliverability.
22 Mar 2024 - SpamResource
Expert view
A deliverability expert from Word to the Wise suggests that digging deeply into bounce reasons is a highly contextual exercise. They emphasize that while hard bounces are generally straightforward, soft bounces demand a more nuanced understanding due to their situational nature.
15 Apr 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
Official documentation from various email service providers and industry resources defines hard and soft bounces based on the permanence of the delivery failure. These sources provide technical explanations, often referencing SMTP codes, to classify different bounce types. They consistently emphasize that hard bounces require immediate list removal to protect sender reputation, while soft bounces warrant retries and careful monitoring to avoid negatively impacting deliverability.
Key findings
Permanent vs. temporary: Documentation consistently states that a hard bounce is a permanent delivery failure (e.g., invalid address), while a soft bounce is a temporary one (e.g., full inbox). This core difference dictates handling.
SMTP error codes: Email error codes starting with a '4' typically indicate a soft bounce, suggesting a temporary issue, whereas codes starting with a '5' are usually hard bounces, signaling a permanent problem. This is covered in technical guides.
Automatic list cleaning: Most ESPs automatically clean hard bounced addresses from sending lists to prevent reputation damage. They may also convert repeatedly soft bouncing addresses to hard bounces after a certain number of attempts.
Recipient status: Hard bounces commonly occur when sending to inactive contacts, addresses that no longer exist, or those with typographical errors. This highlights the importance of data quality.
Key considerations
Immediate suppression: Hard bounced email addresses should be immediately and permanently removed from your active mailing lists to prevent further negative impact on your deliverability and bounce domain reputation.
Soft bounce retry policies: ESPs often have retry policies for soft bounces, attempting delivery multiple times over a period before eventually classifying them as hard bounces if delivery remains unsuccessful. This process affects your overall domain reputation.
Regular validation: Employing email validation services to proactively identify and remove invalid addresses before sending can significantly reduce hard bounce rates.
Analyzing bounce codes: Understanding specific SMTP bounce codes provides deeper insights into why emails are bouncing, allowing for more targeted remediation efforts. This knowledge is crucial for effective bounce management.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp details that soft bounces typically signify a temporary delivery issue. They are handled differently than hard bounces, indicating a system designed to re-attempt delivery for transient problems.
04 Dec 2023 - Mailchimp
Technical article
Documentation from Nylas defines soft bounces as temporary email delivery failures, which often result from issues like a full inbox or a temporary server problem. Conversely, hard bounces are characterized as permanent failures, requiring different management.