Managing hard and soft bounces effectively is crucial for maintaining a healthy sender reputation and ensuring optimal email deliverability in daily campaigns. A robust bounce management strategy involves understanding the nuances of bounce codes, implementing appropriate suppression rules, and continuously monitoring performance. The challenges often lie in the complexity of bounce classifications and the varying interpretations by different internet service providers (ISPs).
Key findings
Classification matters: Accurate classification of bounce codes is essential, as generic 4xx and 5xx codes can represent various underlying issues. Proper handling determines future mail actions, including when to suppress soft bounces.
Impact on reputation: High bounce rates, particularly hard bounces, negatively affect sender reputation and can lead to emails landing in spam folders or being blocked. Regular list cleaning helps improve your email bounce rate.
Dynamic rules: Implementing dynamic bounce rules based on frequency (e.g., a certain number of soft bounces over X days) allows for a more nuanced approach than immediate removal for all non-delivery. This helps in managing hard and soft bounces.
Mailbox full: Persistent mailbox full bounces can indicate an abandoned account and should be treated similarly to hard bounces after a defined period.
Key considerations
Granular classification: Move beyond basic hard/soft categorization by analyzing specific DSN codes and accompanying messages to understand the root cause of the bounce.
ISP-specific handling: Recognize that different ISPs may interpret the same bounce code differently, requiring adaptable bounce logic.
Business reasons for suppression: Define clear business objectives for when to remove an address based on bounce behavior, balancing deliverability with engagement goals.
Automated systems: Leverage email service providers (ESPs) or internal systems that can programmatically interpret bounce codes and apply sophisticated suppression rules.
What email marketers say
Email marketers face the practical challenge of managing bounces in high-volume, daily campaigns. While the ideal solution involves deep analysis of bounce codes and ISP-specific responses, marketers often seek pragmatic rules to balance deliverability, list hygiene, and active subscriber engagement. The consensus leans towards more dynamic rules for soft bounces, rather than immediate suppression, but hard bounces are almost universally seen as a clear signal for removal to protect sender reputation.
Key opinions
Mailbox full strategy: If a mailbox consistently bounces due to being full for an extended period (e.g., 10 days), marketers tend to consider it an abandoned address and treat it as a hard bounce.
Complexity of interpretation: Marketers acknowledge the significant difficulty in programmatically interpreting the vast number of bounce codes and their variations.
Reviewing rudimentary rules: Many marketers inherit basic bounce rules and recognize the need to evolve them for better deliverability, especially for daily sending volumes.
List cleaning emphasis: Consistently cleaning email lists is a core practice to reduce bounce rates and improve overall email health.
Key considerations
Avoiding arbitrary rules: Marketers should avoid setting bounce rules arbitrarily and instead base them on analysis of their specific bounce data.
Contextual understanding: Focus on understanding the specific reasons behind bounces rather than just categorizing them as hard or soft, as this informs better strategy. This involves understanding how email service providers manage bounces.
Balancing suppression: While immediate suppression of hard bounces is common, marketers consider a tolerance for soft bounces, allowing for re-engagement attempts before suppression.
Continuous improvement: Bounce management is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and refinement of rules to adapt to changing deliverability landscapes and ISP behaviors. Regularly managing hard bounced email addresses is key.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests treating an email address as abandoned if its mailbox has been full for 10 consecutive days and hasn't been cleaned, warranting a change in its bounce status.
21 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks points out the considerable difficulty in programmatically interpreting the wide array of email bounce codes, highlighting the complexity of building automated bounce management systems.
21 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts highlight the profound complexity of bounce management, emphasizing that generic classifications are insufficient. They stress the critical need to understand the underlying reasons for bounces, often requiring detailed analysis of SMTP responses and considering ISP-specific behaviors. Experts advise against simplistic rule-sets, advocating for nuanced, data-driven approaches that protect sender reputation while maximizing legitimate email delivery.
Key opinions
Classification depth: The depth of bounce classification directly impacts future mailing decisions. Understanding the specific reason for failure is crucial.
No universal consensus: Experts agree there's no single, simplistic answer to bounce management, as different engines and ISPs handle bounces uniquely.
Beyond the code: Relying solely on DSN codes is insufficient. Contextual information, like which ISP returned the bounce or the full SMTP message, is vital for accurate interpretation. This applies to understanding hard and soft bounces.
Strategic issue: Sometimes, high bounce rates indicate a broader strategy issue, not just a technical one, requiring a holistic review of email practices.
Key considerations
Data-driven decisions: Before implementing rules, thoroughly analyze bounce data to identify specific patterns and root causes. This is crucial for developing soft bounce suppression logic.
ISP variations: Be aware that ISPs may interpret the same bounce code differently, potentially requiring ISP-specific rules or deeper analysis.
Avoiding misclassification: Carefully consider how substring searches are performed on bounce codes to avoid incorrectly categorizing a temporary issue as a permanent one.
Business objectives: Align bounce management policies with overarching business reasons for email sending, balancing deliverability with engagement and cost. More insights can be found from experts on email deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks queries how bounces are classified, asking for specific definitions of hard and soft bounces within the context of the mailer's operations.
21 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that accurate bounce classification is fundamental because it directly informs subsequent actions for future mail to that specific address.
21 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
Official documentation and industry guidelines consistently emphasize that effective bounce management is foundational to good email deliverability. They often outline clear definitions for hard and soft bounces and provide best practices for how to handle each type to maintain list hygiene and sender reputation. Key recommendations include systematic removal of invalid addresses, strategic retries for temporary issues, and robust authentication to prevent bounces in the first place.
Key findings
Immediate hard bounce removal: Hard bounces, indicating a permanent delivery failure, necessitate immediate removal of the email address from the sending list to prevent harm to sender reputation.
Soft bounce retries: Soft bounces, signifying temporary issues, can be retried a limited number of times over a defined period before the address is potentially suppressed.
List hygiene importance: Maintaining a clean email list by regularly removing invalid or inactive addresses is a primary driver of low bounce rates and improved deliverability. This also includes best practices for email verification.
Authentication role: Authenticating your email domain with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is critical for preventing emails from bouncing due to spoofing or authentication failures. Learn more about an in-depth guide to email blocklists.
Key considerations
Suppression strategy: Develop a clear suppression strategy for hard bounces that aligns with industry best practices and ESP recommendations.
Retry policy: Define a sensible retry policy for soft bounces, considering the type of soft bounce (e.g., mailbox full vs. transient server issue) and the potential for resolution.
Monitoring bounce rates: Regularly monitor your overall bounce rate and break it down by type (hard vs. soft) to identify trends and potential issues with your list or sending practices. For more information, read this guide on soft vs. hard bounces.
Content quality: Ensure email content avoids spam triggers and promotes engagement to reduce the likelihood of soft bounces related to recipient filters or low engagement.
Technical article
Documentation from CXL.com advises that the most effective approach to reducing email bounce rate involves rigorously maintaining good list hygiene, including vigilant monitoring of bounce rates and opt-in processes.
01 Nov 2023 - CXL.com
Technical article
Documentation from Twilio.com states that a primary method to improve your bounce rate is to regularly clean your email lists by removing inactive subscribers, invalid email addresses, and non-responders.