Summary
Over-quota mailboxes and other soft bounces, while technically temporary delivery failures, can significantly impact email deliverability and sender reputation if not managed effectively. A consistent high volume of these bounces signals to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that a sender's list is poorly maintained, contains unengaged recipients, or includes abandoned mailboxes. This poor list hygiene can lead to degraded sender reputation, increased filtering, and even silent discarding of emails by ISPs. Proactive list management and the implementation of clear rules for suppressing or removing persistently bouncing addresses are crucial best practices to mitigate these negative effects and maintain strong deliverability.
Key findings
- Indirect Reputation Harm: While the direct impact of over-quota mailboxes on sender reputation is debated, consistently high soft bounce rates are interpreted by ISPs as an indicator of poor list quality, unengaged recipients, or abandoned addresses, which can indirectly damage reputation and even lead to addresses becoming spam traps.
- Over-quota Persistence: Despite being classified as temporary soft bounces, over-quota errors rarely resolve on their own in modern email systems. This often indicates an inactive or abandoned mailbox rather than a brief storage issue, making reattempts futile.
- ISP Scrutiny: ISPs factor overall bounce rates, including persistent soft bounces, into their algorithms for assessing sender reputation. High rates signal problematic sending practices, potentially leading to increased filtering, blocking, or silent discarding of emails.
- Engagement Correlation: A high volume of soft bounces often correlates with low recipient engagement. Sending to these unengaged recipients, even without explicit bounces, is considered a poor practice and can harm deliverability.
Key considerations
- Implement Bounce Thresholds: Establish a clear policy for converting consecutive soft bounces into a 'hard bounce' equivalent or for suppressing and removing the address. Common recommendations suggest removing subscribers after 3 soft bounces within a 15-21 day period, adjusting based on sending cadence.
- Prioritize List Hygiene: Regularly clean email lists to remove addresses that consistently produce soft bounces, such as over-quota errors. This proactive list hygiene emphasizes quality over quantity, improving overall deliverability and sender reputation.
- Proactive Suppression: While many ESPs automatically retry soft bounces, high-volume senders should implement their own proactive suppression rules. Continuously attempting delivery to persistently bouncing addresses offers no value and drags down metrics.
- Understand Bounce Definitions: Be aware that the terms 'hard bounce' and 'soft bounce' can be poorly defined or ambiguously used across different platforms. Focus on the persistent undeliverability of an address rather than strict adherence to labels, ensuring consistent management.
- Monitor and Test: Continuously monitor bounce rates and test the impact of soft bounce suppression strategies. This helps optimize deliverability, ensures no negative impact on conversion, and improves other key email metrics.
What email marketers say
13 marketer opinions
While email bounces due to over-quota mailboxes are categorized as soft, a frequent occurrence of these temporary delivery failures can still significantly undermine email deliverability and sender reputation. This high volume of soft bounces signals to Internet Service Providers that a sender's mailing list may contain inactive or abandoned accounts, indicating a lack of proper list maintenance. Such signals can lead to ISPs scrutinizing sender practices more closely, potentially resulting in emails being filtered, blocked, or even silently discarded. Effective management of these bounces, through proactive removal or suppression of consistently affected addresses, is paramount to maintaining a healthy sender reputation and ensuring optimal email deliverability.
Key opinions
- Poor List Signals: A high volume of soft bounces, even temporary ones like over-quota, is interpreted by ISPs as an indicator of an unmaintained list or unengaged audience, indirectly harming sender reputation.
- Inactive Mailbox Indicator: Persistent over-quota errors often point to abandoned or inactive mailboxes rather than just temporary storage issues, making continued attempts to send to them ineffective.
- Holistic Bounce Impact: ISPs consider all types of bounces, including persistent soft bounces, when assessing overall sender reputation and deliverability, not just hard bounces.
- Varying Bounce Rules: There is no universally agreed-upon industry standard for how many soft bounces should occur before an address is removed, with different senders adopting varied thresholds.
- Definition Ambiguity: The classification of 'hard bounce' versus 'soft bounce' can be inconsistent or poorly defined across different platforms and providers, requiring senders to establish clear internal criteria.
Key considerations
- Define Removal Thresholds: Establish clear, internal policies for converting continuous soft bounces into a status requiring removal or suppression, commonly recommending removal after 3 bounces over a 15-day period, adjusted for sending frequency.
- Regular List Pruning: Actively clean email lists by removing addresses that consistently generate soft bounces to improve overall list quality, deliverability rates, and sender reputation.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that while direct reputation impact is hard to determine, over-quota bounces can become inactive inboxes and eventually spam traps. He advises against 'massaging' these addresses and instead suggests dropping them. He notes that some ESPs convert soft bounces to hard bounces after 3 in 21 days, but emphasizes that high-volume senders should take a more proactive approach to remove these addresses to prevent reputation damage.
22 Feb 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks suggests implementing rules to convert continuous soft bounces into hard bounces, arguing that over-quota mailboxes are unlikely to be a 'potential sell' and are more prone to cause reputation issues. He highlights that reputation is difficult to measure and that sending to unengaged recipients, even without explicit bounces, is bad practice, citing some ISPs' silent discard policies. He supports a policy of removing subscribers after 3 soft bounces in 15 days, adjusting for sending cadence, and cautions that the definition of hard vs. soft bounces can be ambiguous.
29 Jun 2025 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Although categorized as temporary, consistent soft bounces, particularly over-quota mailbox errors, pose a significant risk to email deliverability and sender reputation. A high frequency of these bounces signals to Internet Service Providers that a sender's list is poorly maintained, contains inactive accounts, or prioritizes sheer volume over quality engagement. This can lead to decreased inbox placement and increased scrutiny. Effective management involves understanding bounce codes and proactively suppressing persistently bouncing addresses, emphasizing list hygiene to mitigate these negative impacts.
Key opinions
- Indirect Reputation Risk: Over-quota bounces, though technically soft, often indicate abandoned addresses and can signal poor list quality to machine learning engines, indirectly harming sender reputation.
- Persistent Over-Quota: Modern email systems rarely resolve over-quota errors as temporary; they often point to inactive or abandoned mailboxes, rendering reattempts ineffective and counterproductive.
- Metric Drag: Continuously reattempting delivery to over-quota or persistently soft bouncing addresses provides no value and can negatively impact overall sending metrics.
- ISP Perception: A high volume of any temporary bounce, including over-quota, signals to ISPs that a sender's list is poorly maintained or targets inactive users, critically damaging sender reputation and deliverability.
- Quality Over Quantity: The core issue behind persistent soft bounces often stems from a management strategy that prioritizes sending volume over maintaining list quality.
Key considerations
- Consecutive Bounce Logic: Implement suppression logic based on consecutive soft bounces, rather than single occurrences, to identify truly problematic addresses for removal.
- Proactive Soft Suppression: Test and implement a proactive soft suppression strategy for persistently over-quota or soft bouncing recipients, potentially for 1-2 weeks, to improve metrics without negatively impacting conversions.
- Regular List Cleaning: Suppress or remove addresses that repeatedly soft bounce after a defined number of attempts, as continued efforts are seen by ISPs as wasteful and indicative of poor sending habits.
- Analyze Bounce Codes: Actively analyze and understand various bounce codes, especially temporary '4xx' errors like over-quota, to inform list management decisions and improve deliverability.
- Prioritize List Quality: Shift the focus from maximizing sending quantity to ensuring the highest possible list quality, which naturally reduces soft bounces and enhances sender reputation.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that while no one has definitively stated over-quota mailboxes hurt reputation, they are likely abandoned addresses and could signal spam to some machine learning engines. She notes that over-quota is rarely a temporary error on modern systems and advises that any soft bounces considered for removal logic should be consecutive.
7 Apr 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that reattempting over-quota addresses often provides no value and can drag down metrics. He suggests testing soft suppression for 1-2 weeks for over-quota recipients, anticipating no negative impact on conversion and potential improvements in other metrics, attributing the core issue to a management mentality that prioritizes quantity over quality.
26 Dec 2021 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
6 technical articles
Even though soft bounces, like those from over-quota mailboxes, are initially temporary delivery issues, their persistent occurrence significantly compromises email deliverability and sender reputation. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) interpret a sustained high volume of these bounces as a strong indicator of poor list quality, unengaged subscribers, or abandoned email accounts. This perception can lead to increased filtering, blocking, and even the silent discarding of emails. To safeguard sender reputation and optimize inbox placement, actively managing these temporary failures by consistently cleaning mailing lists and removing problematic addresses is essential.
Key findings
- Transient but Persistent: While classified as temporary, over-quota and similar soft bounces often indicate abandoned or neglected mailboxes rather than fleeting issues, becoming effectively permanent.
- ISP Reputation Signals: A high rate of consistent soft bounces signals to ISPs that a sender's list is poorly maintained, directly impacting sender reputation and deliverability algorithms.
- Automatic Retries, Manual Action: Email Service Providers (ESPs) like Mailchimp and SendGrid automatically retry soft bounces, but this doesn't diminish the sender's responsibility to manage persistent failures.
- RFC Standards vs. Reality: RFCs define these as temporary (4xx codes), implying retries. However, modern deliverability practices require senders to recognize their persistent nature and act accordingly.
- Quality Over Quantity: The underlying problem with high soft bounce rates often points to a list management strategy that prioritizes acquiring many addresses over maintaining the quality and engagement of those addresses.
Key considerations
- Implement Removal Thresholds: Define clear internal rules for when a persistently soft bouncing address should be removed or suppressed, such as after a specific number of retries or a set period.
- Continuous List Hygiene: Proactively clean email lists by identifying and removing addresses that consistently generate soft bounces, as this is a fundamental practice for protecting sender reputation.
- Monitor Bounce Rates: Regularly monitor overall bounce rates, paying close attention to trends in soft bounces, to identify potential list degradation or engagement issues before they severely impact deliverability.
- Beyond ESP Retries: Relying solely on ESP auto-retries for soft bounces is insufficient. Senders must implement their own logic to suppress or remove addresses that remain undeliverable after reasonable attempts.
- Understand Bounce Context: Differentiate between a truly temporary soft bounce and one that signifies an effectively inactive mailbox to make informed decisions about list maintenance.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailchimp explains that soft bounces, including those due to over-quota mailboxes, are temporary delivery failures. While Mailchimp automatically retries soft bounces for up to 72 hours, persistent soft bounces can indicate a problem with the recipient's mailbox or the recipient being inactive. Regularly cleaning lists to remove addresses that consistently soft bounce is a best practice to protect sender reputation and deliverability.
10 Jan 2024 - Mailchimp Knowledge Base
Technical article
Documentation from SendGrid clarifies that soft bounces, including 'mailbox full' (over-quota), are temporary issues. While SendGrid automatically retries these, a high rate of soft bounces can still signal a problematic list or unengaged recipients to ISPs. To protect sender reputation and deliverability, it's recommended to monitor bounce rates and remove addresses that consistently soft bounce after several attempts, as they may indicate inactive or abandoned mailboxes.
25 Jan 2025 - SendGrid Documentation
.png)
Do soft bounces affect email deliverability and sender reputation?
How do bounces impact email deliverability and how can I minimize them?
How do Gmail 'mailbox full' bounces affect email deliverability and how can I monitor it?
How do overquota bounces in Gmail affect sender reputation and what is the best strategy to manage users with overquota errors?
How does Salesforce Marketing Cloud handle email bounces and what are the best practices for bounce management?
What are the best practices for managing hard and soft bounces in daily email campaigns?
