Summary
The impact of soft bounces on email deliverability and sender reputation is a frequently debated topic in the email marketing world, often leading to mixed messages. While opinions vary, the consensus leans towards a nuanced view: soft bounces can, under certain conditions, affect your deliverability and reputation, but the severity and direct causation are not always clear-cut. It's less about individual soft bounces and more about the patterns and underlying issues they might signify.
Key findings
- Nuanced impact: Soft bounces do not always immediately or directly harm your sender reputation, unlike hard bounces. Their effect is often dependent on factors like the volume, frequency, and type of soft bounce.
- Temporary vs. permanent: While soft bounces are technically temporary failures, repeated soft bounces to the same address can indicate a permanent issue or a disengaged recipient, prompting Mailbox Providers (MBPs) and Email Service Providers (ESPs) to treat them more severely over time. For more information, read our article on how hard and soft bounces are defined.
- Underlying issues: High soft bounce rates can signal deeper problems with your email list hygiene or engagement, which do negatively affect deliverability. This includes issues like sending to inactive users or a lack of proper list segmentation.
- ISP-specific handling: Different ISPs (like Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail) and ESPs have varying policies on how they categorize and react to soft bounces, making a definitive, universal answer difficult. For example, some ESPs automatically suppress profiles after a certain number of consecutive soft bounces.
- Type of soft bounce matters: Soft bounces due to blockages (indicating poor reputation) are far more concerning than those caused by a temporary full inbox. Some ESPs might even classify a mailbox full as a soft bounce, even though it can behave like a permanent failure over time.
Key considerations
- Monitor soft bounce rates: While not as critical as hard bounces, unusually high soft bounce rates (e.g., above 2%) should trigger investigation. They can be a weak indicator of broader reputation issues, suggesting you need to minimize bounces.
- Understand ESP policies: Familiarize yourself with how your specific ESP handles different types of bounces and their retry policies. This knowledge is crucial for managing your lists effectively. See how Mailgun describes soft bounces.
- Prioritize list hygiene: Regularly clean your email lists to remove inactive or persistently bouncing addresses. This includes addresses that consistently soft bounce due to full inboxes, as these often indicate disengaged users.
- Segment inactive users: Consider creating a separate segment for addresses that frequently soft bounce. Reduce sending frequency to this group or attempt re-engagement campaigns before outright suppression.
- Focus on root causes: If you see a surge in soft bounces, investigate the root cause. Is it a server issue, a sudden increase in recipient activity, or a sign that your list acquisition methods need re-evaluation?
What email marketers say
Email marketers often find themselves in a complex landscape when it comes to soft bounces. While there's general agreement that soft bounces are less detrimental than hard bounces, the community is divided on how much attention they warrant. Some view them as temporary glitches that largely resolve themselves, while others warn that even temporary failures can accumulate and subtly erode sender reputation over time.
Key opinions
- Mixed messages: Marketers frequently encounter conflicting information, with some sources stating soft bounces impact deliverability directly, and others suggesting they don't until they convert into hard bounces.
- Temporary nature: Many marketers acknowledge that soft bounces are typically temporary issues, such as a full inbox or a temporary server problem, and might not require immediate action.
- Cumulative impact: Despite their temporary nature, some marketers emphasize that repeated soft bounces to the same address can still negatively affect overall deliverability and sender reputation over time, leading to automated suppression by ESPs.
- Indicator of list health: A high volume of soft bounces can signal underlying list hygiene issues or a lack of engagement, which are critical factors for sender reputation. Our page on email sending practices provides additional insight.
- Focus on actionable metrics: Some marketers suggest that other metrics, like spam complaints or unsubscribe rates, are more direct indicators of reputation and should be prioritized over solely focusing on soft bounces.
Key considerations
- Understand bounce types: Marketers should differentiate between various soft bounce reasons, as some are more concerning than others. A temporary server issue is less critical than consistent blockages due to sender reputation.
- Monitor bounce rate thresholds: Keep an eye on your overall bounce rate. A soft bounce rate that becomes unusually high (e.g., exceeding 2%) might signal underlying issues that could affect your sender reputation. Our article on acceptable bounce rate thresholds can provide guidance.
- Automated suppression: Be aware that most ESPs have an automated policy to suppress (stop sending to) addresses that soft bounce repeatedly, typically after 5-7 consecutive failures. This is a crucial step for maintaining list health. Klaviyo, for example, describes their bounce handling.
- Proactive list hygiene: Regularly clean your email lists to remove persistently soft-bouncing addresses, even if they haven't yet become hard bounces. This improves overall deliverability and engagement.
- Re-engagement campaigns: For addresses experiencing temporary soft bounces like 'mailbox full,' consider a targeted re-engagement strategy before permanent suppression.
Marketer view
A marketer from Email Geeks notes that soft bounces are a problem that needs to be addressed. They explain that these issues do not typically become dangerous to sender reputation until they eventually become hard bounces. This perspective suggests that while monitoring is important, immediate panic might not be necessary for every soft bounce.
Marketer view
A marketer from Klaviyo Help Center indicates that a high number of bounces, including soft bounces, can negatively impact deliverability. While hard bounces have a more immediate and severe effect, soft bounces, especially when frequent, contribute to a deteriorating sender reputation over time. This highlights the importance of addressing all bounce types.
What the experts say
Email deliverability experts agree that the question of whether soft bounces affect deliverability is complex and rarely a simple yes or no. They emphasize that the impact is highly dependent on the type of soft bounce, the specific Internet Service Provider (ISP) or Mailbox Provider (MBP) involved, and the overall sending patterns. Experts often stress that while individual soft bounces might be benign, consistent or specific types of soft bounces can indeed signal underlying issues that harm reputation.
Key opinions
- It depends: Experts universally agree that the impact of soft bounces is conditional. It varies significantly based on factors like the ISP, the frequency of bounces, and the specific reason for the bounce (e.g., mailbox full vs. reputation block).
- Not all soft bounces are equal: A critical distinction is made between 'garden variety' temporary soft bounces (like a transient server error) and 'block bounces' (indicating a reputation issue at the recipient's server). The latter are far more damaging.
- Mailbox full nuance: While often categorized as a soft bounce, a 'mailbox full' can signal a permanently abandoned account, especially if consistent. Gmail, for instance, counts all storage, not just email, for quota, meaning 'mailbox full' isn't always about too many emails. Learn more about over-quota mailboxes and soft bounces.
- Indicator vs. cause: Soft bounces are more often an indication of existing reputation or list hygiene problems rather than a direct cause of new deliverability issues. They are symptoms of broader underlying issues with email sending practices. You can read more about why your emails go to spam on our blog.
- High volume concerns: While low soft bounce rates are generally acceptable, unusually high rates (e.g., above 2%) are a red flag and indicate a need for closer examination of sending practices and list health.
Key considerations
- Differentiate bounce types: It's crucial to understand the nuances of bounce classifications. Not all soft bounces are benign, and some, like 'block bounces,' are effectively signals of poor sender reputation. This distinction is vital for proper list management.
- Monitor beyond simple percentages: While bounce rates are a starting point, delve deeper into the types and patterns of soft bounces. For example, consistent 'mailbox full' bounces to specific domains might warrant a different strategy than transient server errors.
- Consult ISP bounce codes: Pay attention to the specific bounce codes provided by Mailbox Providers (MBPs), as these offer insights into the actual reason for the delivery failure. This detailed information helps diagnose and address root causes. Laura Atkins provides excellent resources on various bounce topics.
- Aggressive list cleaning for 'mailbox full': Given that many 'mailbox full' scenarios suggest an abandoned or rarely checked account, consider treating these, after a few retries, as quasi-hard bounces and removing them from your active sending list. This helps maintain a healthy domain reputation for email campaigns.
- Address underlying hygiene issues: If soft bounces are consistently high, it’s a strong signal to re-evaluate your list acquisition and engagement strategies. Focus on obtaining permission-based, active subscribers to improve overall deliverability and reduce all bounce types. Our page on how hard bounces impact deliverability is also relevant.
Expert view
An expert from Email Geeks explains that the statement 'it depends' is a cliché, but it truly applies to soft bounces. They note that the impact varies based on the Internet Service Provider (ISP) and the specific type of soft bounce. Not all soft bounces warrant concern, and most ESPs do not categorize them granularly enough to provide a strong indicator of reputation issues.
Expert view
An expert from Spam Resource emphasizes that it is paramount for senders to pay close attention to bounce rates as they directly influence deliverability. They highlight that high bounce rates are a clear indicator to ISPs that a sender may have poor list quality or be engaging in undesirable sending practices. This can lead to throttling or blocking of emails, which negatively impacts sender reputation.
What the documentation says
Official documentation from various Email Service Providers (ESPs) and email platforms generally acknowledges that both soft and hard bounces can impact email deliverability and sender reputation. While soft bounces are described as temporary failures, the emphasis is often placed on the cumulative effect of repeated soft bounces. Many platforms implement automated suppression policies after a certain number of consecutive soft bounces, highlighting that even temporary issues can become permanent concerns if left unaddressed.
Key findings
- Impact on deliverability: Documentation generally states that soft bounces, along with hard bounces, can negatively affect email deliverability. This is because high bounce rates signal to ISPs that a sender's list quality may be poor or their sending practices are questionable. For more on this, see Campaign Monitor's explanation.
- Automated suppression: Many platforms, like Klaviyo, automatically suppress email profiles that soft bounce a specific number of consecutive times (e.g., seven times). This mechanism is in place to protect sender reputation and improve overall deliverability. This ties into our article on soft bounces and Gmail reputation.
- Sender reputation consideration: While soft bounces are temporary, their persistence can still harm sender reputation. A consistently high soft bounce rate suggests a lack of recipient engagement or issues that could lead to negative signals for Mailbox Providers (MBPs).
- Distinction from hard bounces: Documentation clearly differentiates soft bounces (temporary issues) from hard bounces (permanent failures). Hard bounces typically lead to immediate removal from lists due to their severe and lasting impact on reputation.
- Actionable steps: Most documentation provides guidance on how to identify, understand, and mitigate soft bounces, emphasizing list hygiene and monitoring bounce reasons to maintain good sending health.
Key considerations
- Implement bounce management: Leverage your ESP's built-in bounce management features, which often include automatic suppression of persistently soft-bouncing addresses. This is a crucial step to protect your sender reputation.
- Monitor soft bounce reasons: Don't just track the number of soft bounces, but also the reasons behind them. A high rate of 'mailbox full' bounces could indicate inactive subscribers that need to be cleaned from your list, whereas a temporary server issue might resolve itself.
- Regular list cleaning: Periodically prune your email list to remove addresses that consistently soft bounce. This practice improves your list quality, reduces overall bounce rates, and positively impacts your sender reputation.
- Review subscriber engagement: Persistent soft bounces can be a sign of low engagement. Consider segmenting and re-engaging subscribers who frequently soft bounce, or remove them if re-engagement fails. For issues after an accidental email blast, refer to how to fix sender reputation issues.
- Understand retry policies: Be aware of your ESP's soft bounce retry policies, which dictate how many times they will attempt to deliver an email to a soft-bouncing address before suppressing it. This knowledge helps in managing expectations for your campaigns.
Technical article
Documentation from Klaviyo confirms that both hard and soft bounces negatively impact email deliverability rates. They state that Klaviyo automatically suppresses profiles after seven consecutive soft bounces, highlighting that even temporary failures accumulate and can lead to permanent removal from active sending lists to protect sender reputation.
Technical article
Documentation from Omnisend explains that while a soft bounce signifies a problem that needs resolution, it does not pose a direct threat to sender reputation until it escalates into a hard bounce. This suggests a grace period for temporary issues, but implies that unaddressed soft bounces can eventually become critical to deliverability.
Related resources
15 resources
![Hard Bounce vs Soft Bounce: What's The Difference [2024]](https://moosend.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Hard-bounce-vs-Soft-bounce.png)
Related pages
What is a bounce domain and how does its reputation impact email deliverability?
Should you resend emails to hard bounces, and how are hard and soft bounces defined?
How do over-quota mailboxes and soft bounces affect email deliverability and sender reputation, and what are the best practices for managing them?
How do email soft bounce retry policies affect domain reputation and deliverability?
How do email sending practices impact domain reputation and deliverability?
How do hard bounces impact email deliverability and sender reputation?
How to fix sender reputation issues after accidental email blast and high soft bounce rate?
How do bounces impact email deliverability and how can I minimize them?
Is it bad to email addresses that keep soft bouncing?
What is an acceptable bounce rate threshold and how does it affect sender reputation?
