Enabling DNSSEC introduces potential adverse consequences related to complexity, configuration, performance, and security. Incorrect configuration is a primary risk, leading to DNS resolution failures and website unreachability. The increased complexity in DNS management can result in more errors and a larger attack surface if misconfigured. Performance may be impacted due to added overhead in DNS lookups, and DNS response size. Secure key management is crucial; compromised keys can undermine the entire security DNSSEC is meant to provide. Compatibility issues with DNS providers that lack full DNSSEC support can create problems. Furthermore, debugging DNSSEC issues can be complex and requires specialized tools. The actual benefit of DNSSEC may be limited if robust TLS validation is already in place.
10 marketer opinions
Enabling DNSSEC introduces potential adverse consequences primarily related to complexity, configuration, and performance. Incorrect configuration can lead to DNS resolution failures, making websites or services unreachable. The increased complexity in DNS management can result in more errors and a larger attack surface if misconfigured. Performance may be impacted due to added overhead in DNS lookups. Key management is crucial; compromised keys can undermine the entire security DNSSEC is meant to provide. Compatibility issues with DNS providers that lack full DNSSEC support can also create problems.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares they've been using DNSSEC for 10 years or so, and there can be issues that are DNSSEC specific. The toolchain for management is really important and understanding how to get out of a bad spot is also important. But it's doable.
16 Jan 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from DNSimple discusses that if your DNS provider does not fully support DNSSEC, you might encounter compatibility issues or have limited functionality. This can lead to problems when trying to implement or manage DNSSEC for your domain.
7 May 2022 - DNSimple
4 expert opinions
Enabling DNSSEC can introduce operational complexities, potentially leading to configuration errors and DNS resolution disruptions, although signing zones is straightforward with good DNS system support. If DNSSEC is not implemented correctly or if the resolving service has broken DNSSEC, queries may fail, causing partial outages. While DNSSEC offers an extra layer of assurance, it's not a complete solution for email protection without proper authentication, and it may introduce a performance overhead. Proper key management and DNS system support are crucial to avoid issues, but if TLS is in place, DNSSEC may not offer much additional benefit.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares DNSSEC offers an extra later of assurance, DNSSEC by itself is not enough to protect email if the email isn't properly authenticated in other ways. In addition, there can be a performance hit as it adds overhead to DNS lookups.
15 Oct 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that signing zones is trivial if your DNS system has good support for it, but operationally painful and risky if it doesn’t. Checking DNSSEC at the resolver means that queries just fail if the service has broken their DNSSEC. They have seen partial outages caused by both, so nothing is risk-free.
10 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
5 technical articles
Enabling DNSSEC presents several potential adverse consequences, including significant operational complexity, especially concerning key management. Incorrect implementation can lead to validation failures and domain unavailability. Increased DNS response size may cause slower resolution times for users with poor connections. A compromised key within the DNSSEC chain of trust could undermine the security of numerous domains. Debugging DNSSEC issues requires specialized tools and expertise, complicating troubleshooting and potentially prolonging outages.
Technical article
Documentation from NIST explains that the chain of trust in DNSSEC relies on a hierarchy of keys. If a key in this chain is compromised, it could undermine the security of all domains that rely on it, leading to widespread trust issues.
13 Oct 2022 - National Institute of Standards and Technology
Technical article
Documentation from ICANN shares that one potential issue is increased DNS response size due to the added cryptographic signatures, potentially leading to slower DNS resolution times, especially for users with poor network connections. This is more relevant for large DNS zones with many records.
26 Sep 2024 - ICANN
Can I set DMARC to reject if my domain doesn't send email?
Can implementing DMARC cause a drop in email reputation and open rates?
How can I implement a DMARC reject policy for non-existent domains to prevent spam?
How can I implement a strict DMARC policy without blocking Google Workspace emails?
How does DMARC impact email deliverability, and what are the pros and cons of using it?
How should DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records be configured for domains that do not send email?