The overwhelming consensus is that Junkemailfilter.com is not a reliable indicator of email deliverability issues. Many sources suggest that it is either unmaintained, contains inaccurate data, is too easy to get delisted from, or is simply not well-known or respected within the email community. Experts recommend focusing on well-established and actively used blocklists like Spamhaus, BarracudaCentral, and Proofpoint, and considering the specific email providers of your recipients. Monitoring multiple blocklists, understanding delisting procedures, and ensuring blocklists have up-to-date information are also crucial for maintaining good email deliverability.
11 marketer opinions
The consensus is that Junkemailfilter.com is not a reliable indicator of email deliverability issues. Multiple sources suggest it's either unmaintained, contains inaccurate data, or is too easy to get delisted from. Experts recommend focusing on well-known and respected blocklists like Spamhaus, Spamcop, and Barracuda, querying multiple DNSBLs, and monitoring blocklists in general to maintain a healthy sender reputation.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests to consider Junkemailfilter.com a rogue/unmaintained RBL that nobody sensible uses, so don't stress about it.
10 Oct 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from EmailDeliverability.com shares that querying multiple DNSBLs can help you detect if your mail server IP is listed on any of them. They suggest not relying on only one list.
18 Nov 2021 - EmailDeliverability.com
3 expert opinions
The reliability of Junkemailfilter.com as an indicator of email deliverability issues is questionable. While it might provide an early warning of potential problems, its impact on deliverability to important recipients is likely limited. The relevance of any blocklist depends on whether the recipient's email provider uses it. It is important that blocklist data is up to date, and old/expired entries should be purged regularly.
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource, referring to MXToolbox's information, emphasizes that the relevance of a specific blocklist depends on the recipient's email provider; a listing only matters if the recipient uses that specific blocklist. They advise focusing on the blocklists used by the majority of your recipients.
11 Sep 2021 - Spamresource
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that Junkemailfilter.com is an indicator of some issues (maybe an early warning), but it likely won't cause a ton of delivery issues at places you care about.
4 Aug 2021 - Email Geeks
5 technical articles
This documentation highlights the reliability and value of various established blocklists and reputation services. Spamhaus is noted for its thoroughness, BarracudaCentral for its real-time threat intelligence, Proofpoint for its impact on enterprise users, and Talos for its reputation scoring based on Cisco's data. MultiRBL simplifies checking against multiple blocklists by aggregating results.
Technical article
Documentation from Talos shares they provide reputation scoring and blocklisting services, offering insights into IP and domain reputation based on Cisco's threat intelligence data.
24 Jun 2024 - Talos Intelligence
Technical article
Documentation from MultiRBL details they aggregate results from multiple RBLs (Realtime Blackhole Lists) into a single query, it simplifies the process of checking an IP address against multiple spam databases.
9 Sep 2024 - MultiRBL
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
How can I accurately test and measure email deliverability and sender reputation?
How can you deduce inbox placement metrics using per-ISP open rates and manage bot opens?
How reliable are GlockApps deliverability placement reports and what are the alternatives?
Is Litmus pre-send spam testing sufficient for deliverability monitoring?