Summary
Experts, marketers, and documentation agree that email size does *not* directly trigger spam traps. Spam traps are triggered by sending to specific addresses, often related to list hygiene. However, email size *indirectly* affects deliverability. Large emails, especially those with poorly coded HTML and large attachments, can lead to slower loading times, rendering issues, and a poor user experience. This can increase the likelihood of recipients marking the email as spam, harming sender reputation and potentially increasing spam scores. Mail servers often impose size limits, and exceeding these will result in message rejection/bounce. Optimizing code, compressing images, and keeping email size within reasonable limits (e.g., 102KB or less) are crucial for maintaining good deliverability.
Key findings
- No Direct Spam Trap Trigger: Email size does not directly trigger spam traps; the destination address is the primary factor.
- Indirect Impact on Deliverability: Large emails can indirectly harm deliverability due to slower loading, rendering issues, and poor user experience.
- Server Size Limits: Mail servers impose size limits; exceeding these results in message rejection.
- Code and Content Matters: Poorly coded HTML and large attachments contribute to deliverability problems.
- User Perception Affects Spam: Negative user experience (rendering issues, slow loading) increases the chance of being marked as spam.
Key considerations
- List Hygiene: Maintain good list hygiene practices to avoid hitting spam traps, as this is the primary trigger.
- Email Size Optimization: Keep email size within reasonable limits (e.g., under 102KB) for optimal deliverability and user experience.
- Code and Image Optimization: Optimize HTML code and compress images to reduce email size and improve rendering.
- Attachment Strategy: Consider linking to large files instead of embedding them as attachments.
- User Experience Focus: Prioritize a positive user experience by ensuring emails load quickly and render correctly on various devices.
What email marketers say
10 marketer opinions
While email size itself doesn't directly trigger spam traps, it significantly impacts email deliverability. Larger emails can lead to slower loading times, rendering issues across different email clients, and a poorer overall user experience. These factors can increase the likelihood of unsubscribes or recipients marking emails as spam, ultimately harming sender reputation. Optimizing code, compressing images, and keeping overall email size below recommended thresholds (e.g., 102KB) are essential for maximizing deliverability. Focus should be on a clean design, optimized code, and user experience.
Key opinions
- Direct Trigger: Email size does not directly trigger spam traps.
- Deliverability Impact: Large emails negatively impact deliverability due to longer loading times, rendering issues, and potential timeouts.
- User Experience: Poor user experience (slow loading, rendering issues) increases the likelihood of being marked as spam.
- Spam Score: Overly large emails with messy code can increase spam scores due to perceived unprofessionalism and rendering problems.
- Attachments: Large attachments are more likely to trigger spam filters than the size of the HTML content itself.
Key considerations
- Email Size Limit: Keep email size under recommended limits (e.g., 102KB) for optimal deliverability.
- Image Optimization: Optimize images and consider linking to files hosted online to minimize email size.
- Code Optimization: Use clean, well-coded HTML to reduce email size and avoid rendering issues.
- User Experience: Focus on providing a positive user experience to avoid recipients marking emails as spam.
- Attachments: When adding attachments, consider linking to them instead of embedding them directly in the email.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Gmass explains that large emails with heavy images can slow down deliverability. While it doesn't directly trigger spam traps, it may impact the time it takes for email to get delivered. Spam emails should be avoided by keeping the email short.
9 Oct 2022 - Gmass
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackOverflow clarifies that large attachments are more likely to trigger spam filters than the size of the HTML content itself. Optimize images and consider linking to files hosted online to minimize size.
17 Sep 2024 - StackOverflow
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Experts agree that email size does not directly trigger spam traps. Spam traps are primarily hit based on the destination email address. However, large emails, especially those with poorly coded HTML, can negatively affect deliverability, leading to emails being filtered or experiencing rendering issues. Proper email coding practices are important.
Key opinions
- Spam Trap Trigger: Email size does not directly trigger spam traps; destination address is the key factor.
- Indirect Impact: Large emails with bad HTML can contribute to deliverability problems.
- Filtering and Rendering: Large, poorly coded emails are more likely to be filtered or have rendering issues.
Key considerations
- Proper Coding: Employ proper email coding practices to ensure deliverability.
- Email Size Optimization: Keep email size manageable to avoid potential deliverability issues, even if it doesn't directly trigger spam traps.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that spam trap hits are determined by the destination address, not the content or size of the email.
11 Oct 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise, Laura Atkins, explains that while email size doesn't directly hit spam traps, excessively large emails with badly coded HTML can contribute to deliverability issues, making them more likely to be filtered or have rendering problems. Proper email coding is key.
6 Aug 2024 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Technical documentation indicates that while SMTP standards and IETF specifications do not impose hard limits on email size, mail servers like Gmail and Exchange Online enforce practical size limits. Exceeding these limits results in message rejection or bounces, but email size does not directly trigger spam traps.
Key findings
- No Direct Trigger: Email size does not directly trigger spam traps according to documentation.
- Practical Limits: Mail servers impose practical size limits despite the lack of hard limits in standards.
- Rejection/Bounce: Exceeding server-imposed limits results in message rejection or bounce.
Key considerations
- Adhere to Limits: Adhere to the email size limits set by receiving mail servers to avoid rejection.
- Size vs. Traps: Focus on other deliverability factors, as size does not directly trigger spam traps.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC Editor specifies that SMTP standards do not impose a hard limit on email size, but practical considerations by servers often lead to size restrictions. Exceeding these limits may result in rejection, though it doesn't directly trigger spam traps.
16 Feb 2023 - RFC Editor
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Support states that Exchange Online has message size limits that can be configured by administrators. Reaching those limits will cause the message to bounce, but does not directly cause spam traps.
29 Nov 2022 - Microsoft Support
Are HTTP links penalized by spam filters in email marketing?
Are image-only emails bad for deliverability?
Are spam trigger word lists accurate and should I be concerned about them?
Are spam trigger word lists still relevant for email deliverability?
Are URL shorteners like bit.ly bad for email deliverability?
Can an email template trigger spam filters and cause deliverability issues?
Do email spam filters scan image content and QR codes?
Do PDF attachments negatively impact email deliverability and what are the best practices?
How can I effectively avoid spam filters when sending emails?
