Valimail vs.
Report-URI in 2026
Valimail
Report-URI
vs.
We tested Valimail and Report-URI for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Valimail was stronger for DMARC enforcement planning and sender ownership, while Report-URI was better for teams that already want browser security reporting and need DMARC as one signal inside that workflow.
Published 3 Nov 2025
Updated 29 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
Valimail
Enterprise DMARC enforcement
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Security teams moving known sending sources toward enforcement
In one line
Valimail mapped Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp into clear sender records, then made policy movement easier once each source had an owner.
Report-URI
Security telemetry with DMARC reporting
Starts at
From $54.99 / month
Best fit
Web security teams that also need DMARC visibility
In one line
Report-URI handled DMARC alongside CSP and browser telemetry, but our unknown sender and authentication edge cases made guided fixes and source identification important buying checks.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose by enforcement, telemetry, or guided ownership
Pick Valimail if
Best fit for enterprise teams that want managed DMARC enforcement
Valimail grouped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, so the primary corporate domain had usable sender ownership by week two.
The unauthorized spoof sample was separated from misconfigured approved mail without forcing us to inspect every raw IP first.
Policy movement was strongest on the corporate domain, where Valimail turned domain-matching SPF and DKIM evidence into a clear quarantine path.
Free plan available
Pick Report-URI if
Best fit for technical teams that already operate web security reporting
Report-URI was comfortable for reviewing DMARC next to CSP-style event streams, especially for teams already thinking in event quotas.
SendGrid and Mailchimp appeared as report sources, but the support desk sender and unknown sender took manual labeling to make useful.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, but explaining why it should not block enforcement required more interpretation outside the DMARC view.
From $54.99 / month
Consider Suped if
Best fit when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Suped's product is most relevant when buyers want guided fixes that connect a failed sender to the exact DNS or vendor action needed.
Published starter pricing helps teams compare costs before sales calls, especially when DMARC ownership sits with IT and marketing together.
MSP workflows and automated issue detection matter when the same team manages client domains, parked domains, and recurring handoff reports.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Valimail
Report-URI
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Parsing aggregate reports into usable domain and sender views.
Strong DMARC-first analysis
Supported, reporting led
Supported
Source detection
Identifying the real service behind Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, ESP, and support desk traffic.
Strong sender naming
Manual workflow
Supported
Forward detection
Separating forwarding-related SPF failures from sender misconfiguration.
Partial but usable
Visible, manual interpretation
Supported
Spoof detection
Flagging unauthorized mail that fails DMARC checks and should not be approved.
Clear unauthorized bucket
Visible in failures
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Routing useful changes without flooding secondary domains.
Paid tier nuance
Tier dependent
Supported
Reporting
Exporting, summarising, and sharing reports with stakeholders.
Paid tier exports
Data export included
Supported
API
Programmatic access for reporting, automation, or internal dashboards.
Enterprise or add on
Business tier and above
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Separating clients, business units, or domain groups.
Portfolios on higher tiers
Team access, not MSP led
Supported
SPF flattening
Managing SPF lookup limits and delegated SPF records.
Unlimited SPF on paid tiers
Not supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosting or managing DMARC records through the platform.
Automated DMARC on paid tiers
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosting SPF records or providing managed SPF include handling.
Paid enforcement plans
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managing MTA-STS policy hosting and related TLS reporting workflow.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring blocklist or blacklist signals tied to domain reputation.
Not supported
Not DMARC focused
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Finding authentication problems without relying only on manual report review.
Paid tier tasking
Partial, alert driven
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or investigation inside the product.
Not publicly listed
Enterprise listed
Supported
DNS monitoring
Watching DNS records for changes that affect authentication.
Authentication record focus
Not publicly listed
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
Hosted SaaS
Hosted SaaS
Hosted SaaS
Free trial/free tier
A way to start without committing to a paid contract.
Free Monitor tier
30-day trial
Free plan
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on onboarding, DNS setup, sender classification, policy movement, alerts, account separation, exports, pricing clarity, and support handoff. Higher is better in every row.
Valimail scored higher for enforcement work, while Report-URI scored higher where DMARC sits beside broader security telemetry.
Valimail moved faster once Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were approved because sender classification and enforcement planning were built around DMARC. Report-URI exposed the same report flow, but the support desk sender, forwarded SPF failure, and unknown sender required more manual interpretation. Report-URI gained points for API, webhooks, alerting tiers, and published pricing, but lost points where hosted authentication records and DMARC-specific source resolution were absent.
Valimail score
65/100
Report-URI score
46.5/100
Valimail
65/100
DMARC enforcement
9.0
Customer support
8.5
Source resolution
8.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
5.0
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
6.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
5.0
Time to enforcement
8.5
Report-URI
46.5/100
DMARC enforcement
5.0
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
5.0
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
4.0
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
5.0
Feature set
DMARC depth vs telemetry breadth
Valimail has the deeper DMARC enforcement set. Report-URI has the broader security reporting set.
Valimail was the better DMARC-first product in our test because it connected Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace pass traffic to policy movement and made the spoof sample easy to separate. Report-URI was stronger when DMARC was only one reporting stream beside browser security events. Buyers should check whether guided fixes and automated issue detection are part of the workflow, since raw visibility alone did not resolve our unknown sender quickly.
Valimail
Microsoft 365 mapped cleanly
Unknown sender easier to classify
Subdomain DKIM context stayed visible
Report-URI
DMARC beside CSP events
SendGrid visible with reports
Forwarded SPF needed explanation
Valimail's feature set was built around DMARC ownership. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identified cleanly on the corporate domain, SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to approve for the marketing subdomain, and the unauthorized spoof sample landed in a clear failure path. The DKIM pass on a subdomain was also easier to interpret because the product kept the parent domain, subdomain, and policy state close together.
Report-URI handled DMARC reports inside a wider reporting product. It showed the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic, but the unknown sender needed more manual classification and the support desk sender did not get the same guided ownership treatment. The forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, yet we had to explain outside the product that a DKIM domain match made it less urgent than a true spoof.
User experience
Guidance vs control
Valimail felt faster for DMARC operators. Report-URI felt better for technical teams that want raw control.
Valimail reduced the number of clicks between a domain problem and the next action, especially after all three test domains were sending reports. Report-URI exposed enough data for a skilled operator, but it asked the user to bring more DMARC context to the investigation.
Valimail
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender prompted action
Forwarding context easier
Report-URI
Technical filters worked well
Unknown sender took digging
Forwarded SPF needed context
Valimail onboarding was direct: add the three domains, publish the DMARC record, wait for aggregate reports, then classify sources as they appeared. The primary domain became useful first, the marketing subdomain followed once SendGrid and Mailchimp volume arrived, and the parked domain made the spoof sample obvious because any sending activity was suspicious. The unknown sender still required review, but the workflow pushed us toward a classification decision instead of leaving it as a raw event.
Report-URI setup was simple for a technical user, but the product language was broader than DMARC. The three test domains were easy to add, yet finding the unknown sender took more filtering and cross-checking. The forwarded mail SPF failure was present in the data, but the interface did not explain as clearly that SPF failure alone was expected under forwarding and should be evaluated against the DKIM domain match.
Support
Hands-on help vs self-service
Valimail has the stronger support path for enforcement. Report-URI fits teams that can self-serve.
Valimail's support expectations matched enterprise DMARC work: DNS handoff, onboarding help, and account management are part of the paid enforcement motion. Report-URI's public tiers made the self-service boundary clearer, but onboarding, SLA, procurement, and enterprise support sit behind custom plans.
Valimail
Onboarding help on paid tiers
DNS handoff was clearer
Enterprise escalation path
Report-URI
Self-service purchase clear
Enterprise onboarding custom
DMARC handoff less guided
Valimail was stronger when the task required a human handoff. During DNS setup, the distinction between monitoring and enforcement mattered because hosted SPF and automated DMARC change how much control moves into the product. For enterprise onboarding, the clearest path was to validate Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace first, then bring SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender into the enforcement plan with support available for escalation.
Report-URI was more self-service during our setup. The public pricing tiers made it clear where basic alerting, standard support, API access, webhooks, and priority support start, but DMARC-specific DNS handoff was not the center of the experience. For teams that already know SPF, DKIM, DMARC, forwarding, and event quota handling, that is workable; for teams needing enforcement coaching, it adds internal work.
Suitability
Enterprise fit vs operator fit
Valimail fits enterprise enforcement programs. Report-URI fits hands-on security operators.
Valimail was the better fit when account separation, domain grouping, and recurring executive-style reporting mattered more than raw event handling. Report-URI worked best for a technical team comfortable managing DMARC beside other web security signals. Buyers with MSP workloads should weigh client grouping, handoff notes, and alert quality early, because those details affected our weekly review more than dashboard polish.
Valimail
Enterprise portfolios on higher tiers
Recurring reports felt natural
MSP workflow less central
Report-URI
Operator-led reviews worked
Client handoff stayed manual
Domain grouping was adequate
Valimail suited the enterprise version of our test. The primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain supported different risk reviews, and the enforcement path made sense when the same organization owned Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. For MSP-style use, though, account separation and client reporting felt less central than enterprise portfolio management.
Report-URI suited a smaller technical team or an SMB that already watches client-side security events. Domain grouping was adequate for our three-domain test, but recurring client handoff notes and MSP separation were not the main workflow. The product was more comfortable when one operator owned investigation, exports, alert routing, and the explanation of why a forwarded SPF failure was not the same as spoofing.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Valimail
A DMARC enforcement tool for teams ready to formalize sender ownership
By the end of the first month, Valimail had made the corporate domain the easiest part of the test. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were recognized quickly, the domain-matching SPF and domain-matching DKIM cases were easy to approve, and the unauthorized spoof sample was separated from legitimate senders without a long investigation.
The second and third months exposed the tradeoff. Valimail was strong when we wanted to move toward quarantine, but the parked domain and marketing subdomain raised tier questions around subdomain reporting, alert granularity, exports, and advanced tasking. It felt like a product built for a buyer that already expects a paid enforcement program.
Where it wins
Clear sender ownership for core platforms
Better path to quarantine planning
Useful handling of spoofed mail
Support motion fits enterprise rollout
Where it lags
Paid tier boundaries need checking
MSP workflows were not central
Advanced alerts depend on tier
Pricing detail was incomplete
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
Monitor
Onboarding
Fast for DMARC
G2 rating
4.6 / 5
Report-URI
A security reporting product for technical operators who can interpret DMARC
Report-URI was easy to start if the user already understood event reporting and quota-based plans. The three domains were added without much friction, and DMARC data for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp appeared alongside other security reporting concepts.
After 90 days, the main issue was interpretation. The forwarded mail SPF failure, DKIM pass on a subdomain, and unknown sender were all investigable, but the product did less to turn those findings into sender-owner tasks or a policy movement plan. It worked best when the same technical owner reviewed the raw evidence and decided the next step.
Where it wins
Public pricing was easy to model
API and webhooks on public tiers
Good fit for web security teams
Clear event quota boundaries
Where it lags
DMARC guidance was lighter
Unknown sender classification stayed manual
No hosted SPF or DMARC
MSP handoff required outside process
Pricing
From $54.99 / month
Free tier
30-day trial
Onboarding
Self-service
G2 rating
5.0 / 5
Pricing
Valimail
Report-URI
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Monitor can cover basic DMARC visibility, but enforcement functions require a paid plan.
$54.99 / month
Starter covers 1 protected domain and 100,000 monthly events.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From $5,000 / year
Enforce Starter starts here publicly, but exact included domains and volume need confirmation.
$109.99 / month
Professional covers 2 protected domains and 250,000 monthly events.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Premium or Enterprise is the relevant path because public Starter limits are incomplete.
Custom
Public self-service plans list up to 5 protected domains, so 10 domains requires Enterprise review.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise pricing depends on volume, domains, subdomains, sending services, and support needs.
Custom
Enterprise is the relevant tier for custom domains, custom events, SLA, onboarding, and procurement.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Valimail Monitor at $0 and Enforce Starter from $5,000 / year are public list prices; Premium and Enterprise amounts are not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Report-URI self-service monthly prices are public list prices; Large and Enterprise estimates use the public domain and event limits to identify when custom Enterprise pricing is required. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Clearer issue-to-fix flow
Valimail classified sources well, but some failed cases still needed tier checks or support handoff. Suped's product ties authentication issues to specific guided fixes, so a failed support desk sender or subdomain DKIM problem can move straight to an owner action.
DMARC-first investigation
Report-URI exposed the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure, but the explanation stayed operator-led. Suped's product focuses on DMARC source identification and automated issue detection, which reduces the manual work behind those cases.
MSP-ready ownership
Both products required extra thought for recurring client handoff in our MSP-style review. Suped's product has MSP workflows and per-domain pricing, which fits teams managing separate client domains and repeated reporting cycles.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Valimail or Report-URI?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
