Suped

URIports vs SimpleDMARC

Choose URIports for extensive protocol support, or SimpleDMARC for a straightforward DMARC focus.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides comprehensive DMARC reporting, but its strength lies in its broader support for web security policies beyond DMARC. We found it meticulously tracks CSP, NEL, SMTP TLS-RPT, Permissions Policy, COOP, and COEP.
Its DMARC-specific features are robust, including advanced DMARC explanation tools, automatic subdomain detection, and configurable thresholds to filter out report noise. We appreciate the depth of data enrichment, pulling in geocoding, hostname lookups, and WHOIS information for a complete picture.
SimpleDMARC focuses primarily on DMARC, providing essential aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports. Its dashboard is designed to give a clear overview of domain security and identify potential threats.
We noticed it includes look-alike domain alerts and threat mapping by geography, which are valuable for understanding attack vectors. While it offers team invitations for multi-user access, its feature set is more streamlined compared to URIports, concentrating on core DMARC needs.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers a slick and easy-to-use interface, which is impressive given the breadth of data it handles. We found navigating through the various report types and deep-diving into data points to be intuitive.
Setting up domains and configuring policies is straightforward, and the advanced DMARC explanation tool is a significant help for understanding complex issues. The predefined and custom views are excellent for quick analysis, allowing us to quickly hone in on what matters.
SimpleDMARC lives up to its name with a simple and easy-to-understand UI. Our experience showed that the dashboard provides a clear visual representation of domain status and reports, making it accessible even for those less familiar with DMARC.
While one review mentioned the UI could be overwhelming for some, we generally found it to be quite user-friendly, especially for managing a single active domain. The ease of setup is a definite plus for quick deployment.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports includes basic product support across all tiers. For those on higher-end plans, such as the Himalaya tier, in-depth premium support becomes available. We haven't had to use it extensively, but the documentation is thorough.
The self-service tools like SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validators also reduce the need for direct support by empowering users to troubleshoot common issues themselves.
SimpleDMARC's support offering isn't explicitly detailed in their public information beyond the tool's inherent simplicity. In our testing, the intuitive interface often meant that extensive support was not immediately necessary.
For core DMARC issues, the provided reports and analytics are usually sufficient for self-diagnosis. For more complex problems, users would likely need to rely on standard customer service channels.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is an excellent choice for organizations that need more than just DMARC, especially those implementing a full suite of web security policies. We found it highly suitable for enterprise clients and larger SMBs that prioritize granular control and detailed analysis across various reporting types.
While not explicitly marketed for MSPs, its multi-tenancy features (Team Access and OpenID Connect in higher tiers) make it viable for managing multiple client domains effectively. Its extensibility for additional domains also caters to growing needs.
SimpleDMARC is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses that need a straightforward, focused DMARC solution without the added complexity of other web security protocols. Its ease of use and clear reporting make it accessible for teams with limited dedicated security personnel.
For MSPs, the '1 active domain' structure with unlimited passive domains might be a limitation for managing numerous clients actively, though the team invitations feature is helpful. It's a solid choice for organizations prioritizing quick DMARC implementation and monitoring.

How does URIports compare with SimpleDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports is feature-rich but might be overkill if you only need DMARC monitoring. SimpleDMARC is more focused, but its pricing structure for multiple active domains can become prohibitive, and it lacks some advanced features like MTA-STS support and integrated blocklist monitoring. Neither product currently has any AI copilot functionality, which is becoming more common in this space.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Good for a modern day business with heavy reliance on email.
What do you like best about SimpleDMARC? In complex IT environments, implementing DMARC becomes easy with their discovery tool. What do you dislike about SimpleDMARC? 99 dollars a month is quite high for many small businesses. They should offer low value plans with limited features. What problems is SimpleDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Identifying email service providers that are being used by the organization.
Jasmit Singh J.
CEO & Technology Specialist Information Technology and Services Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Simplified Form of Dmarc. Too easy to use and understand!
What do you like best about SimpleDMARC? The ui is really simple and easy to understand. If we look at the dashboard they have given plenty of reports and analytics to look at for knowing if your domain is secured or not! What do you dislike about SimpleDMARC? It has DNS history which that could have been done a little better. Other than that all things are relevant and upto the mark. What problems is SimpleDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It's protecting your domain and emails again phishing attacks and making your domain authority increase with daily checks
Gokul M.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
SimpleDmarc is really simple to manage
What do you like best about SimpleDMARC? excellent reporting tools, easy to setup What do you dislike about SimpleDMARC? should include spam checking and IP reputation tools too What problems is SimpleDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Phishing emails stopped immediately and reported to my email account
Bhavin S.
admin Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
My Experience with Simple DMARC: The Easy Way to Protect Your Domain
What do you like best about SimpleDMARC? The advantages of using Simple DMARC are numerous. It helps domain owners gain better control over their email domain's reputation, ensures email deliverability, and reduces the likelihood of email phishing attacks. It also provides detailed reporting and analysis of email traffic, enabling domain owners to detect and prevent email-based threats quickly. What do you dislike about SimpleDMARC? Some users may find the user interface of SimpleDMARC to be a bit overwhelming or complex, especially for those who are not familiar with email authentication protocols. What problems is SimpleDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Ensuring email deliverability: SimpleDMARC helps ensure email deliverability by making sure that legitimate emails are not marked as spam or blocked by email filters. This means that more of your emails will reach their intended recipients.
Yogesh P.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

URIports offers a granular, tiered pricing structure based on reports and domains, while SimpleDMARC has a simpler, higher-priced model per active domain.
Logo
Logo
Small
USD 1/month (3 domains, 10k reports)
Not suitable (lowest plan USD 99/month)
Medium
USD 6/month (5 domains, 100k reports)
USD 99/month (1 active domain, unlimited emails)
Large
USD 28/month (25 domains, 500k reports)
USD 99/month (1 active domain, unlimited emails)
Enterprise
USD 110/month (100 domains, 2.5M reports) or USD 440/month (400 domains, 10M reports)
USD 99/month (1 active domain, unlimited emails); potentially more for multiple active domains

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or SimpleDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    URIports vs SimpleDMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped