Suped

URIports vs MailHardener

Choose URIports for comprehensive features, MailHardener for robust security focus.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports provides a broad suite of features beyond just DMARC, including CSP, NEL, SMTP TLS-RPT, and more. Their platform excels at data enrichment, offering geocoding, hostname lookup, whois data, and abuse contact information, which can be invaluable for forensic analysis.
We found their tools for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MTA-STS validation and optimization to be very capable. The platform automatically detects subdomains and offers advanced DMARC explanation tools, making it easier to understand complex email authentication issues.
MailHardener focuses heavily on email security, offering not only DMARC monitoring but also robust tools for SPF, DKIM, and TLS. They place a strong emphasis on proactive protection against spoofing and phishing, with features designed to identify and mitigate threats quickly.
The platform integrates blocklist and reputation monitoring, providing insights into your sending reputation and helping to prevent your legitimate emails from landing in spam folders. Their approach is comprehensive, covering various aspects of email delivery and security from a defensive standpoint.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports boasts a slick and easy-to-use interface, which we generally found to be true. The dashboards are well-organized, and navigating through reports and settings is intuitive. The advanced DMARC explanation tool is particularly helpful for demystifying complex records and policy decisions.
However, with such a wide array of features, the initial learning curve can be a bit steeper for users who are only looking for basic DMARC monitoring. Once you get the hang of it, the ability to search, filter, and deep dive through reporting data, along with predefined and custom views, makes analysis efficient.
MailHardener offers a clean and straightforward user interface that prioritizes essential information. We found it relatively easy to get started, especially for configuring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. The focus on core email security makes the platform less overwhelming for new users.
While effective, some advanced customization options or deeper forensic tools might require a bit more effort to locate or configure compared to more feature-dense platforms. Overall, its design promotes clarity and efficiency, allowing users to quickly grasp their email authentication status and address critical issues.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports offers basic product support across all its tiers, which covers general inquiries and platform usage. For those requiring more in-depth assistance, premium support is reserved for the highest-tier plans, specifically the Himalaya tier.
This tiered approach to support means that smaller organizations or those on lower-cost plans might not receive the same level of personalized or urgent assistance, which is a common model but worth noting if extensive support is a priority for your team.
MailHardener provides support primarily through email, and their documentation is generally thorough. While they do not explicitly detail different support tiers in their public pricing, our experience suggests responsive assistance for technical queries related to DMARC and email security.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) on their specialized plan, it's reasonable to expect a higher level of dedicated support, given the nature of managing multiple client domains. However, detailed information on response times or specific support channels for different plans isn't readily available.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
URIports is well-suited for organizations that require comprehensive email and web security reporting beyond just DMARC. Its extensive feature set makes it a strong contender for larger SMBs and enterprises that have dedicated IT or security teams capable of leveraging its full capabilities. For MSPs, the team access and scalable domain bundles are beneficial.
The advanced data enrichment and wide range of supported report types make it ideal for those who need deep insights into their entire online presence, not just email deliverability. It's particularly useful for companies with a strong focus on compliance and robust incident response, offering tools to understand and act on a variety of security policies.
MailHardener is an excellent choice for businesses primarily focused on strengthening their email authentication and protecting against spoofing and phishing. Its straightforward interface and dedicated email security features make it suitable for SMBs looking for a robust, yet manageable, DMARC solution.
MSPs will find their specialized plan appealing for managing multiple client domains, offering a clear path to provide email security services. While it covers essential DMARC needs for enterprises, organizations seeking broader web security reporting might find URIports more aligned with their needs. It is best for those who prioritize a strong, dedicated email security posture.

How does URIports compare with MailHardener?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

URIports, while feature-rich, can feel a bit overwhelming initially due to its comprehensive dashboard. Its pricing structure, especially for higher domain counts, can also scale up quickly, potentially impacting smaller budgets. MailHardener, on the other hand, provides strong core email security but might lack some of the broader web security and in-depth forensic tools that URIports offers. Its detailed pricing for higher tiers is also not publicly available, requiring direct contact.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

URIports offers transparent tiered pricing with discounts for annual payments, whereas MailHardener has a free plan but requires direct contact for details on its paid business and MSP tiers.
Logo
Logo
Small
$1/month (10k reports)
Free plan
Medium
$6/month (100k reports)
Contact for pricing
Large
$110/month (2.5M reports)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
$440/month (10M reports)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with URIports or MailHardener?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions