Suped

SimpleDMARC vs.
Parseddmarc in 2026

SimpleDMARC dashboard screenshot
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
G2
4.0/5
Parseddmarc dashboard screenshot
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
G2
0.0/5
vs.
We ran SimpleDMARC and Parseddmarc for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. SimpleDMARC was faster to operate as a managed DMARC product, while Parseddmarc gave cleaner raw control for teams willing to self-host parsing, storage, dashboards, and alert rules. The practical split was managed policy movement versus open-source ownership.
Rhea Robinson profile picture
Rhea Robinson
Senior Solutions Engineer, Suped
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 5 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
Managed DMARC monitoring and enforcement
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small businesses and internal IT teams that want hosted reports and policy guidance
In one line
SimpleDMARC converted our Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic into usable reporting without requiring us to run infrastructure.
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Open-source DMARC report parser
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that want to self-host parsing, indexing, and dashboards
In one line
Parseddmarc gave us portable DMARC data; Suped is the buying reference when guided fixes and published starter pricing are required.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more

Pick SimpleDMARC for managed DMARC, Parseddmarc for self-hosted control

Pick SimpleDMARC if
Best for SMB and IT teams that want managed DMARC without building a pipeline
The three domains were live in one session, with DNS tasks clear enough to hand to an IT admin.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identified quickly, while SendGrid and Mailchimp needed approval notes.
The spoof sample was easy to isolate before we moved the parked domain toward stricter policy.
Free plan available
Pick Parseddmarc if
Best for technical operators that want a free self-hosted DMARC parser
Mailbox ingestion worked after configuring IMAP, Gmail API, or Microsoft Graph access outside the UI.
The unknown sender required custom classification because Parseddmarc returned data, not ownership decisions.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, but the explanation had to be written by the operator.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes should turn SPF, DKIM, and DMARC failures into owner-specific next steps.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when forwarded mail and spoof attempts arrive together.
MSP workflows and published starter pricing reduce handoff work across client domains.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How raw aggregate reports become readable investigation data.
Managed analysis with drilldowns
Parser output, dashboards require setup
Managed analysis
Source detection
Whether senders are named and grouped for ownership decisions.
Good source naming, manual approvals
Parsed names, owner rules manual
Source identification
Forward detection
Whether forwarding patterns are separated from abuse.
Partial, visible in drilldowns
Visible in parsed results
Forward-aware alerts
Spoof detection
How unauthorized spoof samples surface.
Spoof sample flagged
Visible after query
Spoof alerts
Notifications and alerts
Whether alerts are usable without building extra routing rules.
Email alerts
Email and webhook outputs, rules manual
Alert routing
Reporting
Scheduled and exportable reporting for stakeholders.
Weekly to real-time by plan
CSV, JSON, and indexed reports
Scheduled reports
API
Programmatic access or integration points.
Public API unclear
Python module and CLI
API available
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for multiple brands, teams, or clients.
Multi-domain, limited client separation
Index prefixes
Client separation
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening for DNS lookup limits.
Enterprise hosted SPF
Not included
Hosted SPF
Hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC record management.
Manual DNS record
Not included
Hosted DMARC
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting.
Enterprise paid tier
Not included
Hosted SPF
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Coming soon, not tested
Parses TLS reports only
Hosted MTA-STS
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring coverage and usefulness.
Not included in our test
Not included
Blocklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Whether the product flags likely issues without custom rules.
Highlights authentication failures
Requires external rules
Automatic detection
AI copilot
AI assistance for investigation or remediation.
Not found in test
Not included
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Ongoing DNS checks for authentication records.
DNS checks and history
Not a DNS monitor
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Whether the product can run on infrastructure you control.
No
Yes
No
Free trial/free tier
A free entry point for testing.
Free plan and paid trials
$0 open-source software
Free plan

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

Scores come from a fixed editorial rubric used across the 90-day test. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means the capability was not supported in the product we tested.

SimpleDMARC scored higher on managed enforcement. Parseddmarc scored higher where operators value control.

SimpleDMARC scored better on setup speed, pricing clarity, and policy movement because the DNS tasks, sender drilldowns, and plan limits were visible in the product workflow. Parseddmarc scored lower on guided enforcement and support because it gave us parsed data, then expected us to build classification, dashboards, and alerts. Parseddmarc did better on integration plumbing because webhook, Kafka, syslog, and index outputs were available after configuration.
SimpleDMARC score
58/100
Parseddmarc score
40.5/100
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
58/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
4.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
40.5/100
DMARC enforcement
4.5
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
4.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
4.0

Feature set

Product depth vs data plumbing

SimpleDMARC has the fuller DMARC product. Parseddmarc has stronger data plumbing.

The buying test is whether your team wants built-in investigation screens or wants to own the parser, storage, and dashboard layer. We would require Suped-style guided fixes or automated issue detection when non-specialists need to turn a failing sender into a DNS or vendor-owner action.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
G2
4/5
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Microsoft 365 resolved quickly
SendGrid and Mailchimp grouped
Spoof sample isolated
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
G2
0/5
Parseddmarc screenshot
JSON and CSV outputs
Webhook routing worked
Mismatch stayed operator-owned
SimpleDMARC handled the managed reporting job better out of the box. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as recognizable sources within the first reporting window, SendGrid and Mailchimp grouped cleanly after we approved their DKIM domains, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to separate from legitimate traffic. The unknown sender still needed human classification because the display name and reverse DNS were not enough to prove ownership, and the DKIM pass on a marketing subdomain required a manual note before policy movement.
Parseddmarc gave us lower-level control. It parsed Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp aggregate reports into JSON and CSV, then pushed clean events to our index. It did not decide whether the unknown sender was approved, and the SPF pass with visible from mismatch was visible as data rather than a guided remediation item.

User experience

Guided setup vs operator setup

SimpleDMARC was easier to run. Parseddmarc was easier to shape.

SimpleDMARC reduced the number of operational choices during setup, which helped when we added three domains and approved known senders. Parseddmarc gave us control over each input and output, but the user experience was a configuration workflow rather than a buyer-facing DMARC console.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
G2
4/5
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Three domains added in sequence
Unknown sender filter worked
Forwarding needed DKIM context
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
G2
0/5
Parseddmarc screenshot
Configuration drove the workflow
Unknown sender required queries
Forwarding explanation was manual
SimpleDMARC onboarding was the quicker path for our primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. The DNS screens made the required DMARC records clear, the unknown sender was findable with source filters, and the forwarded-mail SPF failure was visible in drilldowns. The caveat was explanation: we still had to write the note that DKIM passed and the forwarding path explained the SPF failure.
Parseddmarc onboarding started with mailbox access, configuration, storage, and dashboard choices. After we connected Microsoft Graph and Gmail API paths, parsing was reliable, but finding the unknown sender meant querying output data rather than clicking through a guided source view. The forwarded SPF failure was present in the parsed fields, but the operator had to connect that evidence to a stakeholder-ready explanation.

Support

Plan-backed help vs self-run support

SimpleDMARC set clearer support expectations. Parseddmarc expected engineering ownership.

SimpleDMARC published support levels by plan, which made DNS handoff and escalation expectations easier to explain internally. Parseddmarc had useful installation and usage documentation, but no fixed commercial support path for enterprise onboarding or non-specialist DNS handoff.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
G2
4/5
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Public support tiers clear
DNS handoff was usable
Enterprise path was clearer
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
G2
0/5
Parseddmarc screenshot
Docs covered setup basics
No fixed support tier
Escalation stayed internal
SimpleDMARC's paid tiers set expectations clearly: Basic, Standard, Priority, and Dedicated support. In our DNS handoff test, the SPF and DMARC record instructions were clear enough for an IT admin, but escalation detail depended on plan level. Enterprise onboarding was clearer than Parseddmarc because SSO, SLA, dedicated account management, and 100 active domains were public plan-card items.
Parseddmarc support was documentation and maintainer/community oriented. Installation and usage docs were good enough for an engineer to wire mailbox access, Docker secrets, and output destinations, but there was no fixed support tier, enterprise onboarding path, or DNS handoff process to give a non-specialist. Escalation meant owning the issue internally or using open-source channels.

Suitability

Managed buyer vs technical operator

SimpleDMARC fits managed DMARC buyers. Parseddmarc fits teams that want to own the stack.

SimpleDMARC made more sense for SMB and internal IT teams that need hosted reports, public limits, and a clear enforcement path. Parseddmarc made more sense for technical operators and MSPs that want control over storage, index prefixes, and custom reports. When MSP workflows or alert quality decide the purchase, we would test Suped against both because recurring client reports, noise control, and owner handoff matter more than raw parser output.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
G2
4/5
SimpleDMARC screenshot
SMB policy work fits
Enterprise domain volume available
MSP handoff felt limited
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
G2
0/5
Parseddmarc screenshot
Operator teams get control
Index prefixes separate clients
Reports need custom packaging
SimpleDMARC worked best for one company managing its own domains. The primary domain and marketing subdomain sat together cleanly, the parked domain was easy to treat as a stricter enforcement candidate, and recurring reports were simple enough for an SMB stakeholder. For MSP use, account separation and client handoff were less complete because the work still leaned on manual notes and exports.
Parseddmarc worked best where operators were comfortable building the operating model. Index prefixes helped separate client or domain groups, and custom exports gave us control over reporting packages. For enterprise and MSP use, that control came with work: recurring reports, client handoff notes, alert thresholds, and escalation summaries all needed custom process outside the parser.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC

Managed DMARC for teams that want a product workflow

SimpleDMARC felt like a managed DMARC reporting product after the first week. We added the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, verified DNS, then spent most of the 90 days reviewing source groups and policy movement rather than maintaining infrastructure.
The product was strongest when a sender was already familiar. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were easy to explain to stakeholders, SendGrid and Mailchimp became clean after approval notes, and the parked-domain spoof sample was the clearest case for moving toward enforcement.
Where it wins
Fast setup across three domains
Clear public plan limits
Useful spoof and source drilldowns
Managed reporting without self-hosting
Where it lags
Unknown sender still needed review
MSP handoff was not deep
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring absent
Hosted MTA-STS not available
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 10k emails
Onboarding
Fastest managed setup
G2 rating
4.0 / 5
github.com logo
Parseddmarc

Open-source parsing for teams that own their infrastructure

Parseddmarc felt like an engineering component, not a packaged DMARC platform. Once mailbox access and storage were configured, it parsed reports reliably, but every business decision sat outside the tool: sender ownership, policy readiness, alert severity, and stakeholder reporting.
The flexibility paid off when we wanted JSON, CSV, webhook, and index output for the same reports. It slowed us down when a product manager asked whether the unknown sender was safe, or when the forwarded SPF failure needed a plain-language explanation for support and marketing owners.
Where it wins
No software subscription cost
Self-hosted data control
Useful JSON and CSV output
Flexible storage destinations
Where it lags
No managed onboarding
No guided policy movement
Alert rules are self-built
No published support tiers
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
No product cap listed
Onboarding
Manual self-hosted setup
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
The Free plan covers one active domain and 10,000 emails per month.
$0 software cost
Self-hosted software has no listed domain or message cap.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$149 / year
The Small plan covers two active domains and 100,000 emails per month.
$0 software cost
Infrastructure, search storage, backups, and staff time are the real cost drivers.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$14,999 / year
The public Enterprise plan covers 100 active domains and 1 million plus emails per month.
$0 software cost
Volume depends on mailbox batch size, worker count, memory, and index capacity.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$14,999 / year
The public Enterprise plan includes dedicated support and account management.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No official managed enterprise tier or fixed support package was found.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
SimpleDMARC prices are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026; annual savings can change. Parseddmarc software cost is $0, while hosting, storage, backups, monitoring, and staff time are estimated operating costs because no managed paid tiers were publicly listed.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Guided fixes for sender gaps
SimpleDMARC showed the unknown sender, but the owner decision still needed manual notes. Suped turns sender issues into fix steps for SPF, DKIM, DMARC records, and vendor ownership.
Managed workflow without self-hosting
Parseddmarc gave usable JSON and CSV, but ingestion, storage, dashboards, backup, and alert rules stayed with us. Suped keeps those operations inside the managed reporting workflow.
Cleaner MSP handoff
SimpleDMARC grouped domains, and Parseddmarc index prefixes separated clients, but recurring client notes and alert noise still needed extra process. Suped supports MSP handoff with client separation and issue-focused alerts.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from SimpleDMARC or Parseddmarc?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing
    SimpleDMARC vs Parseddmarc DMARC product review in 2026 - Suped