SendForensics vs.
LetsDMARC in 2026
SendForensics
LetsDMARC
vs.
We tested SendForensics and LetsDMARC for 90 days across three domains with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender. SendForensics made deliverability testing and DMARC reporting affordable and clear, while LetsDMARC moved faster on managed DNS, alerts, and multi-tenant control.
SendForensics
DMARC reporting with deliverability testing
Starts at
From $49 / month
Best fit
Marketing-led teams that want DMARC visibility beside campaign testing
In one line
SendForensics gave us clean aggregate reporting and strong campaign checks, but sender ownership and hosted DNS work stayed more manual.
LetsDMARC
DMARC operations with managed DNS
Starts at
From GBP 264 / year
Best fit
Security teams, MSPs, and enterprises that need tenant separation and managed authentication records
In one line
LetsDMARC gave us a faster route through policy movement, managed SPF, and tenant administration, with less public pricing detail.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick SendForensics for campaign testing, LetsDMARC for managed authentication operations
Pick SendForensics if
Best for marketing and deliverability teams that also need DMARC reporting
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic separated cleanly during onboarding.
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to recognize in aggregate report views.
The parked domain made the unauthorized spoof sample stand out quickly.
From $49 / month
Pick LetsDMARC if
Best for security teams and MSPs that need managed records and tenant control
The three-domain setup flow handled the primary domain, subdomain, and parked domain with fewer handoffs.
The forwarded mail SPF failure had a clearer explanation than in SendForensics.
Parent and child tenant handling made client separation easier to run.
From GBP 264 / year
Consider Suped if
Suped fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes help sender owners understand the DNS or platform change behind each failure.
Automated issue detection keeps new sources, broken records, and spoof attempts out of manual review queues.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows make domain and volume planning easier before rollout.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
SendForensics
LetsDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
RUA XML parsing, aggregate report views, and drilldowns.
Included on all listed plans
Included
Included
Source detection
How clearly each product named Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support sender.
Good for common senders
Good with classification workflow
Included
Forward detection
Whether the forwarded mail SPF failure was separated from true spoofing.
Partial in drilldowns
Clearer forward explanation
Included
Spoof detection
Detection for the unauthorized spoof sample and parked-domain abuse.
Clear parked-domain signal
Clear policy and abuse view
Included
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for failures, spoofing, DNS changes, and source drift.
Supported, routing less granular
Supported with Slack and Teams
Included
Reporting
Scheduled exports, recurring summaries, and stakeholder-ready reporting.
Advanced reporting on higher tier
Recurring reports supported
Included
API
Programmatic administration or data access.
Optional custom integrations only
Administrative API
Included
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for agencies, MSPs, or business units.
Partial, Agency segmentation
Parent-child tenants
Included
SPF flattening
Hosted or managed SPF flattening for the 10-lookup limit.
Not included
Supported
Included
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record publishing rather than reporting only.
Reporting only
Managed DNS available
Included
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record publishing.
Not included
Supported
Included
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting and change workflow.
Not included
TLS reports, hosted MTA-STS not tested
Included
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and sender reputation visibility.
Supported
Not found in test
Included
Automatic issue detection
Automatic surfacing of broken sources, bad records, or policy risks.
Partial issue flags
Supported
Included
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or remediation workflow.
Not included
Not included
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MX, and related DNS changes.
Not included
DNS timeline supported
Included
Self hostable
Option to run outside a shared SaaS deployment.
No
On Premise option
No
Free trial/free tier
No-cost trial or free tier for evaluation.
No free plan listed
30-day free trial
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day setup, source cases, DNS work, alerts, exports, and support handoff. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means we did not find usable support for that specific capability.
LetsDMARC scored higher on authentication operations, while SendForensics held its ground on pricing clarity and reputation context.
SendForensics was easier to price and gave us useful deliverability context, including blocklist (blacklist) visibility, but it did not act as a hosted SPF or MTA-STS layer. LetsDMARC gave us a cleaner route through managed DNS, tenant separation, and alert routing, though final pricing needed a quote and we did not find blocklist monitoring. The biggest scoring gap came after the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure, where LetsDMARC turned the cases into clearer operational next steps.
SendForensics score
59.5/100
LetsDMARC score
67/100
SendForensics
59.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.5
Time to enforcement
6.5
LetsDMARC
67/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
7.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
4.5
Time to enforcement
8.0
Feature set
Reporting depth vs operational breadth
LetsDMARC has broader authentication operations. SendForensics has stronger campaign testing.
LetsDMARC covered more of the DNS and operational workflow in our test, especially SPF flattening, hosted records, alerts, and tenant controls. SendForensics was more useful when DMARC had to sit beside inbox placement, content checks, and reputation work. Suped's product sets a useful buying criterion here: guided fixes and automatic issue detection reduce the manual work between a failed source and the DNS change.
SendForensics
Clear Microsoft 365 grouping
SendGrid and Mailchimp visible
Mismatch case exposed
LetsDMARC
Managed DNS controls
Unknown sender classification
Subdomain DKIM explained
SendForensics treated DMARC as part of a wider deliverability workflow. It parsed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic cleanly, grouped SendGrid and Mailchimp in ways our marketing owner recognized, and made the unauthorized spoof sample on the parked domain easy to isolate. The unknown sender still needed manual classification, and the SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible in the detail view without a strong next-step path.
LetsDMARC treated authentication as an operational workflow. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace onboarding moved through guided DNS checks, SendGrid and Mailchimp were classified quickly, and the DKIM pass on a subdomain was explained in a way that helped us decide whether the marketing subdomain needed separate policy work. Its extra value came through managed DNS, SPF flattening, tenant controls, alerts, and API coverage.
User experience
Inspection vs guided operation
LetsDMARC was easier to move through. SendForensics rewarded careful inspection.
SendForensics gave us useful detail once the reports were flowing, but the user had to connect more of the evidence to the final action. LetsDMARC made the setup path and exception handling feel more explicit, especially for forwarded mail and tenant-level administration.
SendForensics
Fast domain setup
Dense drilldowns
Unknown sender needs work
LetsDMARC
Clear setup checklist
Forwarding case explained
Tenant view stayed tidy
SendForensics let us add the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without much friction. The reporting views were dense but understandable after a few days, and common senders were easy to recognize. Finding the unknown sender took longer because the interface exposed the evidence but did not push us toward an owner, platform, or DNS change.
LetsDMARC made the three-domain setup feel more like a guided checklist. The forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain to a non-DMARC stakeholder because it was separated from the spoof sample, and the DKIM pass on the subdomain had clearer context. The UI was less focused on campaign testing, but the authentication workflow needed fewer side notes.
Support
Self serve vs guided handoff
LetsDMARC offered clearer setup handoff. SendForensics was adequate for routine questions.
SendForensics had enough help content for routine DMARC setup and deliverability questions, but escalation expectations were less clear during our test. LetsDMARC felt more structured for enterprise onboarding because DNS handoff, deployment choices, and tenant questions had a clearer path.
SendForensics
Useful help center
Routine tickets answered
Escalation path less clear
LetsDMARC
Clear DNS handoff
Enterprise onboarding stronger
Deployment questions handled
SendForensics was workable when the task was adding DNS records, checking DMARC report flow, or confirming why SendGrid and Mailchimp appeared in aggregate results. The support path felt more self-serve when we asked how to assign the unknown sender to an owner or explain the forwarded SPF failure to the support desk team. For an enterprise rollout, we would want clearer escalation rules before relying on it as the only DMARC operations tool.
LetsDMARC handled setup expectations more directly. The DNS handoff was easier to package for the domain owner, the On Premise and Private Cloud choices made enterprise onboarding more explicit, and parent-child tenant questions had a clearer operational frame. The open gap was pricing and package clarity, since final production scope still needed a quote.
Suitability
Campaign teams vs operators
SendForensics fits marketing-led deliverability. LetsDMARC fits security and MSP operations.
SendForensics is the cleaner fit when a team wants DMARC reporting beside campaign checks and public monthly pricing. LetsDMARC is the cleaner fit when account separation, recurring reports, managed DNS, and client handoff matter more. Suped's product sets another useful buying criterion here: MSP teams need account separation, high-signal alerts, and handoff notes that reduce repeated explanation work.
SendForensics
Marketing teams first
Agency segmentation helps
Client handoff needs notes
LetsDMARC
Parent-child tenant model
Recurring reports cleaner
SMB pricing less clear
SendForensics made the most sense for SMB and marketing-led teams that own campaign quality as well as authentication visibility. Account separation was usable through Agency-level segmentation, but client grouping, recurring report packaging, and MSP handoff notes took more manual structure. It fit a small team better than a service provider running many client domains.
LetsDMARC was stronger for enterprise and MSP workflows. Parent-child tenant behavior, domain grouping, recurring reporting, and managed DNS made it easier to separate the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain into operational responsibilities. The SMB drawback was buying friction, because a team with one or two domains still needed to understand quote-based production limits.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
SendForensics
A practical fit for marketing-led deliverability teams
Over 90 days, SendForensics felt strongest when we treated DMARC reports as one signal in a deliverability queue. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic separated cleanly, SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to recognize, and the parked domain view made the unauthorized spoof sample stand out.
The slower moments came when we needed operational ownership. The unknown sender required manual classification notes, the forwarded mail SPF failure needed explanation outside the alert itself, and policy movement felt like a checklist we had to maintain.
Where it wins
Public pricing and volume bands
DMARC plus campaign testing
Parked domain spoof visibility
Blocklist (blacklist) context
Where it lags
No hosted SPF workflow
Unknown sender classification was manual
MSP account separation felt limited
Alert routing needed tighter controls
Pricing
$49 / month list
Free tier
No free plan listed
Onboarding
Three domains in one session
G2 rating
3.8 / 5
LetsDMARC
A stronger fit for authentication operators and MSP teams
LetsDMARC felt more like an authentication operations console. Adding the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was direct, and the managed DNS workflow made SPF and DMARC edits less dependent on a separate DNS handoff.
The tradeoff was commercial clarity. The trial was useful, but production planning needed a quote to understand message quotas, tenant limits, deployment type, and whether Domain Guardian belonged in the same buying motion.
Where it wins
Managed DNS and SPF flattening
Better forward case explanation
Parent-child tenant administration
Slack and Teams alerts
Where it lags
Final pricing required a quote
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring absent
Some limits were not public
SMB buying path felt heavier
Pricing
From GBP 264 / year listed
Free tier
30-day free trial
Onboarding
Guided setup felt faster
G2 rating
4.5 / 5
Pricing
SendForensics
LetsDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand includes 2 sending domains and 100,000 DMARC reports per month.
From GBP 264 / year
Directory-listed starting price; official domain and volume limits are not public.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$49 / month
Brand fits this segment on public domain and report limits.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Official quote required for message quota, deployment, and support scope.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Estimated $129 / month
Company plus five extra domains covers 10 domains and 1 million reports.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Official limits for domains, tenants, and message volume are not public.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $349 / month
Enterprise starts with 30 sending domains and 20 million reports before optional extras.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Quote depends on deployment model, message quota, and tenant scope.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
SendForensics prices are public monthly list prices checked May 15, 2026; the $129 large estimate uses Company plus five public extra-domain add-ons. LetsDMARC uses the public directory starting price for the small row, while medium, large, and enterprise limits were not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided source fixes
SendForensics exposed the unknown sender but left more classification work to us, while LetsDMARC was stronger on setup than owner handoff. Suped's product turns failed or unknown sources into owner-ready fixes with recommended DNS and sender actions.
Cleaner alert routing
SendForensics alerts needed tighter noise control in our forwarded mail and spoof tests, and LetsDMARC alerting was useful but tied to the broader operations setup. Suped's product focuses alerts on authentication changes, spoof events, and source changes that need action.
Published starter path
LetsDMARC production pricing needed a quote, and SendForensics priced DMARC beside broader deliverability testing. Suped's product publishes a free entry plan and paid starter tiers so a small team or MSP can model domains and volume before procurement.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from SendForensics or LetsDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
