Suped

Report-URI vs VerifyDMARC

Choose Report-URI for in-depth insights, VerifyDMARC for straightforward monitoring.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers a robust DMARC reporting service, providing granular data and insights directly from your DMARC aggregate and forensic reports. It excels in delivering a raw, unfiltered view of your email traffic, allowing technical users to dive deep into authentication failures and identify potential spoofing attempts. We appreciate its focus on the core DMARC specification.
The platform provides comprehensive reporting features, including detailed breakdowns of senders, authentication results (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and geographical distribution. This level of detail is invaluable for advanced users and security professionals who need to understand every nuance of their email ecosystem, even if it means sifting through a lot of data.
VerifyDMARC provides a more streamlined approach to DMARC monitoring, focusing on ease of use and actionable insights. It aims to simplify the complex world of email authentication, offering clear dashboards and summaries that make it easier for users to identify legitimate senders and unauthorized sources without getting bogged down in raw data.
Beyond DMARC, VerifyDMARC integrates other crucial email security protocols, such as TLS-RPT, offering a broader view of your email infrastructure's health. We find its comprehensive suite valuable for organizations looking for a unified platform to manage various aspects of their email security and deliverability.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI's user experience is geared towards technical users who are already familiar with DMARC and email authentication concepts. The interface, while functional, prioritizes data density and raw access over visual polish. It can feel a bit intimidating for newcomers, requiring a steeper learning curve to fully utilize its powerful capabilities.
We found that navigating through reports and configuring alerts requires a solid understanding of DMARC policies and reporting syntax. For those comfortable with this level of technical detail, the platform offers precise control and deep dives into email traffic, making it a powerful tool for forensic analysis.
VerifyDMARC focuses heavily on a user-friendly experience, making DMARC accessible to a wider audience. Its dashboards are clean, intuitive, and designed to present complex data in an easy-to-understand format. We found the setup process to be straightforward, with clear guidance on how to configure DMARC records and begin monitoring.
The platform's emphasis on visual summaries and actionable recommendations reduces the need for deep technical expertise. This makes it an excellent choice for businesses or individuals who want effective DMARC protection without the steep learning curve often associated with email authentication protocols.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with Report-URI's support indicates a strong, community-focused approach, complemented by a solid knowledge base. While direct, personalized support might be more limited compared to broader platforms, the available documentation is extensive, catering to users who prefer self-service and technical troubleshooting.
For complex DMARC challenges, we found that the platform's resources empower users to find solutions independently. However, for those requiring immediate, hands-on assistance, the support channels are primarily ticket-based, which may not always suit urgent requests or less technically inclined users.
VerifyDMARC provides a more accessible and guided support experience, aligning with its user-friendly philosophy. We found that their support channels, including email and potentially chat, are responsive and designed to assist users through setup, configuration, and ongoing DMARC management.
The platform aims to reduce the burden of DMARC implementation and monitoring, offering direct assistance to ensure users can quickly resolve issues. This approach is particularly beneficial for businesses that may not have dedicated email security experts on staff, providing peace of mind and efficient problem-solving.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is best suited for organizations with a strong technical team or DMARC experts who need granular control and access to raw data. Enterprises with complex email infrastructures, security firms, or large organizations that perform their own email forensics will find its capabilities invaluable. It is less suitable for SMBs without dedicated technical resources.
MSPs serving clients with high-security requirements and in-house DMARC expertise might use Report-URI, but it's not inherently built for multi-tenancy management. It thrives in environments where deep analysis and custom scripting are preferred over automated, simplified management, making it an excellent tool for those who enjoy getting their hands dirty.
VerifyDMARC is an excellent choice for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises seeking a more managed and user-friendly DMARC solution. Its simplified interface and clear actionable insights make it accessible for teams that may not have dedicated DMARC specialists. We find it particularly beneficial for organizations prioritizing ease of deployment and ongoing management.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), VerifyDMARC's intuitive design and broader feature set, including other email security protocols, make it highly suitable for multi-tenancy. It allows MSPs to efficiently manage DMARC policies for multiple clients, providing a comprehensive solution without the need for extensive training or deep technical dives into raw data.

How does Report-URI compare with VerifyDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback is its complexity and less modern user interface, which can be a barrier for those without deep DMARC knowledge. While powerful for forensic analysis, it lacks the broader suite of email security management features that some competitors offer. For VerifyDMARC, its main comparative drawback is that it offers less raw data access than Report-URI, which might frustrate highly technical users who prefer to sift through every detail themselves.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI provides a free tier and requires contact for specific pricing details on paid plans, while VerifyDMARC clearly states plans begin at $1 per month with a 30-day free trial, though exact tier pricing also requires inquiry.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free tier available; Contact for paid plan pricing.
Starting at $1/month (estimated).
Medium
Contact for pricing.
Contact for pricing.
Large
Contact for pricing.
Contact for pricing.
Enterprise
Contact for pricing.
Contact for pricing.

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or VerifyDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Report-URI vs VerifyDMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped