Is Report-URI suitable for small businesses?

Yes, Report-URI is well-suited for small businesses. Its user-friendly interface and managed service model reduce the technical burden, making DMARC monitoring accessible even without a dedicated IT security team.

Can Parseddmarc provide real-time DMARC alerts?

Parseddmarc itself is a parsing utility and does not natively provide real-time alerts. However, you can integrate its output with other tools like Splunk or Elasticsearch, and then configure those systems to generate alerts based on the processed DMARC data.

Which product is better for MSPs?

Report-URI is generally better for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) because it offers multi-tenancy features and a managed platform that streamlines monitoring for multiple clients. Parseddmarc would require significant custom development and management for each client, making it less efficient for MSP operations.

Does Report-URI offer a free plan?

Yes, Report-URI offers a free tier. While its pricing information requires direct contact, it typically includes a basic free plan with limitations on the number of domains or report volume.

Report-URI vs Parseddmarc

Q: Do I need technical expertise to use Parseddmarc?

Yes, significant technical expertise is required to implement and use Parseddmarc. It's a command-line tool that demands familiarity with Python, system administration, and potentially integrating with other data visualization or SIEM tools to build a complete DMARC reporting solution.

Choose Report-URI for comprehensive DMARC monitoring, or Parseddmarc for a self-hosted, open-source solution.

5 / 5(1)

Compare to Suped

Parseddmarc

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

Parseddmarc

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Parseddmarc

Report-URI offers a robust DMARC reporting and monitoring platform. It provides a web interface for easy configuration and visualization of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, allowing users to understand email authentication results at a glance. We found its dashboard to be quite effective in presenting complex data in an accessible format.

Beyond DMARC, Report-URI also supports other security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP) and Certificate Transparency. While its primary focus is on reporting, it aims to provide a broader view of security, which is a definite plus for organizations managing multiple security policies. The level of detail it provides on email sources and authentication failures is good for pinpointing issues.

Parseddmarc stands out as a self-hosted, open-source Python utility designed specifically for parsing DMARC reports. It's not a full-fledged DMARC reporting platform with a web UI; instead, it processes raw DMARC XML reports, offering output in formats like JSON or CSV. This means the core 'reporting' features, such as data visualization and advanced analytics, are left for the user to implement using other tools.

The utility can ingest reports via IMAP, Microsoft Graph, or the Gmail API, and it supports sending processed data to platforms like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka. We appreciate its flexibility for those who want full control over their data and infrastructure, but it's important to understand that you're building a solution around it, rather than using an out-of-the-box system.

Parseddmarc

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Parseddmarc

From our experience, Report-URI offers a relatively straightforward user experience, especially for those new to DMARC. The setup involves adding a DMARC record that points reports to their service, and then the data starts flowing in. The web interface is clean, allowing us to navigate through different reports, filters, and visualizations without too much hassle.

While the sheer amount of data can sometimes be overwhelming, the platform does a decent job of summarizing key insights. It allows for drill-downs into specific email sources and authentication results, which is crucial for troubleshooting. We found the learning curve to be gentle, making it accessible to a broad range of users, from small businesses to larger enterprises.

Parseddmarc, being a command-line interface (CLI) tool, naturally requires a more technical user. There's no graphical user interface to click through; instead, we interacted with it via scripts and configurations. This means that setting it up involves familiarity with Python, system administration, and potentially database/log management systems like Elasticsearch.

The experience is hands-on and highly customizable, which can be a double-edged sword. For technical users who thrive on control and customization, it's excellent. For those looking for a plug-and-play solution, Parseddmarc presents a significant challenge. You're effectively building your own DMARC reporting dashboard, which adds complexity but also unparalleled flexibility.

Parseddmarc

Which product has the best support

Support

Parseddmarc

Report-URI, as a commercial service, provides professional support channels. We found that their documentation is thorough, covering common setup issues and features. For more specific inquiries or troubleshooting, their support team is generally responsive.

While we haven't encountered major roadblocks, the availability of a dedicated support team provides peace of mind, especially when dealing with critical email deliverability issues. This structured support is a key advantage for organizations that require guaranteed assistance.

Parseddmarc relies on community support, primarily through its GitHub repository. This means support comes in the form of opening issues, contributing to discussions, or finding solutions within the existing codebase or community forums. There is no dedicated support team or service level agreement (SLA) associated with it.

For open-source projects, this model works well for users who are comfortable with self-help and technical investigation. However, if you run into a complex issue or need immediate assistance, you're dependent on the community's availability and expertise. This is a significant consideration for businesses that lack internal resources for extensive troubleshooting.

Parseddmarc

Who should use each product

Suitability

Parseddmarc

Report-URI is best suited for organizations of all sizes, from small to medium businesses (SMBs) to large enterprises, that prefer a managed, out-of-the-box DMARC reporting solution. It's an excellent choice for teams that want clear visualizations and actionable insights without the need for extensive technical configuration or infrastructure management.

Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also find Report-URI highly suitable due to its multi-domain management capabilities and commercial support. It simplifies the process of monitoring DMARC for numerous clients, allowing MSPs to offer DMARC as a service efficiently without deep technical overhead.

Parseddmarc is ideal for highly technical individuals, DevOps teams, or large enterprises with significant internal IT resources that prioritize full control, customization, and self-hosting. It's perfect for those who want to integrate DMARC data into existing security information and event management (SIEM) systems or build bespoke reporting dashboards.

It is less suitable for SMBs or MSPs without dedicated development and infrastructure teams, as the overhead of deployment, maintenance, and building custom reporting can be substantial. For MSPs, integrating Parseddmarc for multiple clients would require a bespoke solution for each, which could be resource-intensive.

Parseddmarc

How does Report-URI compare with Parseddmarc?

Parseddmarc

DMARC report analysis

Aggregate and forensic report processing.

Source detection

Identifies sending IPs and domains.

Provides raw data for analysis

Forward detection

Identifies mail forwarding issues.

Provides raw data for analysis

Spoof detection

Flags potential email spoofing attempts.

Provides raw data for analysis

Notifications and alerts

Real-time alerts for policy changes or threats.

Requires custom integration

Reporting

Dashboards and custom report generation.

Comprehensive UI reports

Raw data for custom reports

API

Programmatic access to data and features.

CLI based, no traditional API

Multi-tenancy

Manage multiple client domains from one account.

Requires custom implementation

SPF flattening

Helps stay under SPF 10-lookup limit.

Hosted DMARC

Service manages your DMARC records.

Self-hosted solution

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Reporting for secure mail transport.

TLS-RPT parsing included

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors IP reputation and blocklist status.

AI copilot

AI-driven insights and recommendations.

DNS monitoring

Checks for changes in DNS records.

Self hostable

Can be installed and run on private infrastructure.

Free trial/free tier

Option to use the product at no cost.

Limited free plan

Free, open-source

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback is that its visual interface, while functional, can sometimes feel a bit dated compared to newer tools. Its one negative review (though a 5-star one) mentions occasional difficulties deleting trackers that still detect traffic, which could be a minor annoyance for some users. For Parseddmarc, the biggest "drawback" is its fundamental nature: it's a raw parsing tool, not a complete solution. This means users must invest significant time and resources into building the reporting infrastructure around it, including dashboards, alerts, and long-term data storage. Its command-line interface is powerful but inherently limits its accessibility to less technical users.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

5 / 5(1)

Parseddmarc

0 / 5(0)

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI operates on a commercial pricing model, requiring users to contact them for specific tier costs, whereas Parseddmarc is entirely free as an open-source, self-hosted solution, with costs only arising from your chosen infrastructure.

Parseddmarc

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Free (self-hosted)

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Free (self-hosted)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing