Report-URI provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and monitoring features within a polished, hosted platform. We found its primary strength lies in its ability to centralize and visualize DMARC data from numerous sources, making it easy to identify email authentication issues. It goes beyond basic reporting, offering specific insights into sending sources and potential spoofing attempts.
Beyond DMARC, Report-URI also extends its capabilities to include SPF flattening, a valuable feature for domains with complex DNS records, and monitoring for other crucial email security standards like BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT. This holistic approach makes it a strong contender for organizations seeking broad email security visibility.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is a pure DMARC reporting solution, designed for those who prefer to self-host and maintain their infrastructure. Its core functionality is to ingest DMARC aggregate reports and present them in a web interface. We appreciate its straightforward approach, focusing on delivering the raw DMARC data effectively without extraneous features.
As an open-source tool, its feature set is community-driven and more basic compared to commercial offerings. It provides essential DMARC report parsing, visualization of authentication results, and source identification. However, advanced features such as SPF flattening, BIMI monitoring, or integration with MTA-STS/TLS-RPT are not part of its native offering, reflecting its specialized scope.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Report-URI offers a clean and intuitive user interface that we found easy to navigate, even for those new to DMARC. The dashboards are well-organized, providing quick overviews of DMARC compliance, authentication failures, and identified sending sources. The setup process is streamlined, primarily involving DNS record updates and a simple platform configuration.
Its SaaS nature means that all maintenance and updates are handled by the vendor, significantly reducing the operational burden on users. This ease of use, combined with a clear visual presentation of complex data, allows teams to quickly understand their DMARC posture and take corrective action without needing deep technical expertise in database management or server administration.
The user experience for Open-DMARC-Analyzer starts with the installation process itself, which requires technical proficiency in setting up a web server, PHP, and a MariaDB database. This self-hosted nature means that ongoing maintenance, security patches, and updates are entirely the user's responsibility, which can be a significant commitment.
Once installed, the interface is functional but less polished than commercial alternatives. We found it presents DMARC data in a clear, albeit basic, tabular and graphical format. While it effectively displays the necessary information, its raw data approach might require more effort for interpretation and trend analysis, particularly for less technical users. The lack of guided workflows or proactive recommendations means a steeper learning curve.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI provides official support channels as part of its commercial offering. We have generally experienced prompt and knowledgeable assistance for issues ranging from platform usage to DMARC implementation queries. Access to support often depends on the chosen plan, with higher tiers typically offering more dedicated or faster response times.
The presence of comprehensive documentation and FAQs further augments its support ecosystem, allowing users to find answers to common questions independently. This structured support system is a significant advantage for organizations that require reliable assistance to maintain their email security posture.
As an open-source project, Open-DMARC-Analyzer primarily relies on community support. This typically means finding assistance through online forums, GitHub issues, or community groups. While the community can be very helpful for common issues, there is no official, guaranteed support channel or service level agreement.
For critical issues or highly specific configurations, we found that users need to be prepared to troubleshoot themselves or seek help from consultants familiar with the project. The quality and speed of support can vary significantly. This model suits users who are comfortable with self-reliance or have in-house technical teams capable of managing and resolving potential challenges.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is highly suitable for a broad range of users seeking a hassle-free DMARC monitoring solution. SMBs will appreciate its ease of use and reduced administrative burden, allowing them to focus on core business operations rather than server management. Enterprise organizations will benefit from its comprehensive feature set, scalability, and robust reporting capabilities, which are crucial for large-scale deployments and compliance requirements.
For MSPs (managed service providers), Report-URI offers a centralized platform to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently. Its multi-tenancy features and detailed reporting make it an excellent choice for providers who need to offer DMARC as a service without deep infrastructure investment.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is best suited for technically proficient users, particularly developers, system administrators, or organizations with strong DevOps capabilities. SMBs might find the self-hosting requirement too demanding in terms of resources and expertise. For enterprise clients, while it offers full control, the lack of commercial support and advanced features might necessitate significant internal development to match a SaaS solution.
MSPs could potentially use Open-DMARC-Analyzer if they have the technical resources to deploy and manage instances for each client, or to build a custom multi-tenant wrapper around it. However, the overhead might outweigh the benefits for many. It's ideal for those prioritizing complete control over their data and infrastructure, and who are comfortable with the open-source model of community support and self-maintenance.
How does Report-URI compare with Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse and present DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identification of legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.
Advanced identification with context.
Basic identification based on report data.
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding in DMARC reports.
Spoof detection
Tools and insights to help identify email spoofing attempts.
Clear visualization and alerts.
Raw data for manual analysis.
Notifications and alerts
Proactive alerts for DMARC policy changes or issues.
Configurable alerts.
Requires custom setup.
Reporting
Comprehensive and customizable reporting features.
Scheduled and detailed reports.
Basic graphical and tabular reports.
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data.
For data retrieval and integration.
Direct database access required.
Multi-tenancy
Support for managing multiple domains or clients.
Built-in for managing multiple entities.
Requires multiple instances or custom solutions.
SPF flattening
Service to reduce SPF lookup count.
Hosted DMARC
Vendor-managed DMARC record creation and updates.
Full SaaS solution.
Requires manual DNS management.
BIMI
Monitoring and reporting for BIMI records.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT policies.
Blocklists and reputation
Integration with email blocklists or reputation services.
Basic reputation insights.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC configuration or analysis.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring the health of DNS records.
Basic DMARC/SPF/DKIM checks.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own servers.
Cloud-based SaaS only.
Designed for self-hosting.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or permanently free usage tier.
Generous free tier.
Open-source, no software licensing cost.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI's main drawback is its reliance on a subscription model, which can become costly for larger organizations or those managing many domains, especially when considering the advanced features. Open-DMARC-Analyzer's primary challenge lies in its self-hosted nature, demanding significant technical expertise and ongoing resources for deployment, maintenance, and updates, making it less accessible for teams without dedicated IT support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks. Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system. It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Report-URI operates on a subscription model with various tiers, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is open-source and free, though it incurs self-hosting costs.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, variable infrastructure costs
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, variable infrastructure costs
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, variable infrastructure costs
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, variable infrastructure costs
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
5 / 5(1)
