Suped

Report-URI vs Netcraft Fraud Detection

Choose Report-URI for granular DMARC data, choose Netcraft Fraud Detection for robust fraud intelligence.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and monitoring tools. We find its strength lies in the detailed breakdown of DMARC data, allowing for granular analysis of email traffic sources, authentication results (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and potential threats. Its interface is designed to present complex data in an accessible way, with various filtering and aggregation options.
Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI includes features like SPF flattening to avoid the 10-lookup limit, DNS monitoring for related records (like MX, A, AAAA), and support for BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT. This makes it a powerful tool for a holistic approach to email authentication and security, giving us a broad view of our domain's email health.
Netcraft Fraud Detection approaches email security from a broader anti-phishing and anti-fraud perspective, with DMARC monitoring as one component of its larger offering. Its primary focus is on identifying and mitigating brand abuse, phishing attacks, and malicious domains. While it provides DMARC reports, the emphasis is less on deep, self-serve analysis and more on actionable intelligence and threat takedowns.
This platform integrates DMARC data with other threat intelligence sources, including its extensive blocklists (or blacklists) and reputation databases. We see it as a solution for organizations primarily concerned with active online fraud and brand protection, where DMARC contributes to a wider threat landscape rather than being the sole focus.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI's user interface is functional and provides extensive data visualization. It can be a bit overwhelming for new users due to the sheer volume of information and filtering options available. However, for those who regularly delve into DMARC data, the tools are highly effective, offering deep insights into email streams.
The initial setup involves adding a DMARC record, which is straightforward, but configuring advanced features like custom alerts or specific data views requires some familiarity with DMARC concepts. We find that the platform assumes a certain level of technical understanding from its users.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, while comprehensive in its overall security offering, presents DMARC data within a broader context of threat intelligence. The DMARC reporting interface is generally clean, but it's geared towards providing high-level summaries and identifying immediate threats rather than enabling deep-dive analysis by the end-user.
Its strength lies in automating the detection of suspicious activity and providing consolidated reports on fraud attempts. We observe that users who prioritize automated threat detection and takedown services over self-service DMARC analytics may find this approach more appealing and easier to manage daily.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers support primarily through documentation, FAQs, and a ticketing system. We've found their knowledge base to be quite detailed, covering most common questions and setup guides. For complex issues, their support team is responsive, though responses can sometimes take a little longer during peak times.
Given the technical nature of DMARC, having clear documentation is crucial, and Report-URI generally delivers on this. We believe that users who prefer to find solutions independently, backed by solid documentation, will appreciate their support model.
Netcraft Fraud Detection provides support that aligns with its managed service approach to fraud detection. This means more direct engagement for threat remediation and incident response, which can be invaluable when dealing with active phishing campaigns or brand impersonations. Their DMARC support is typically integrated into their broader security services.
We've seen that their support shines in crisis situations, offering expert guidance and quick action. For DMARC-specific issues, the support is capable, but it's often part of a larger, more hands-on security relationship rather than a standalone DMARC support channel.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is an excellent choice for organizations that need a powerful, self-service DMARC reporting and analysis tool. It's highly suitable for IT professionals and security teams who want to deeply understand their email authentication status and actively manage their DMARC policy. Its free tier is also attractive for small businesses (SMBs) and individuals just starting their DMARC journey.
For managed service providers (MSPs), Report-URI can be a solid option if they manage DMARC for clients and are comfortable handling the detailed configuration and reporting themselves. Enterprise clients will appreciate the depth of data and the ability to integrate with other systems, though it might require dedicated staff to fully leverage its capabilities.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with a significant brand presence that are frequently targeted by phishing and impersonation attacks. Its integrated fraud detection, takedown services, and comprehensive blocklist (or blacklist) intelligence make it ideal for those who need an active defense against online threats, with DMARC as a contributing signal.
MSPs focusing on comprehensive security and brand protection services for their clients will find Netcraft's offering valuable, as it provides a broader security umbrella. SMBs might find its full suite of services to be more than they require, potentially exceeding their budget or operational needs if DMARC is their sole concern.

How does Report-URI compare with Netcraft Fraud Detection?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback can be its learning curve for those unfamiliar with DMARC's intricacies, and its interface, while powerful, isn't always the most intuitive. Netcraft Fraud Detection, while strong in fraud mitigation, offers less granular self-service DMARC analytics, which might be a limitation for organizations focused purely on DMARC policy enforcement.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI offers a free tier and various paid plans based on email volume, while Netcraft Fraud Detection requires direct contact for a custom quote, reflecting its enterprise-focused, managed service model.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free tier available
Contact for pricing
Medium
Paid plans start
Contact for pricing
Large
Custom pricing tiers
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Custom pricing tiers
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions