Suped

Report-URI vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose Report-URI for comprehensive DMARC logging, or Fraudmarc Community Edition for open-source control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers robust aggregation and detailed reporting for DMARC, Content Security Policy (CSP), and other security policies. We appreciate its ability to centralize various security reports, providing a holistic view of domain health. It's a mature platform with a history of reliable data collection.
Beyond DMARC, Report-URI provides monitoring for standards like MTA-STS and TLS-RPT, which are crucial for advanced email security. Its interface allows for deep dives into individual reports, helping us pinpoint issues quickly, although some users might find the sheer volume of data initially daunting.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) provides the foundational DMARC reporting necessary for understanding your email ecosystem. Being open-source, it offers full transparency into how your DMARC reports are processed. This gives technically advanced users the ultimate control over their data.
The strength of Fraudmarc CE lies in its flexibility. While it doesn't come with a polished, pre-built dashboard like commercial offerings, its open-source nature means that skilled users can build custom reporting and alerting systems tailored precisely to their needs, leveraging the raw DMARC data it processes.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI presents a structured and largely intuitive interface for DMARC monitoring. Once configured, data flows in and is visualized in an organized manner, making it relatively easy to identify trends and potential issues. For basic DMARC enforcement, the setup is straightforward.
However, for those new to DMARC or email security, the density of information and the various configuration options can sometimes be overwhelming. While it provides powerful insights, getting the most out of every feature requires a bit of a learning curve, especially when diving into specific policy reports.
Fraudmarc Community Edition offers a distinctly different user experience, primarily because it is a self-hosted, open-source solution. The initial setup requires significant technical expertise, involving server configuration, database management, and potentially command-line operations. This is not a plug-and-play solution.
For users comfortable with managing their own infrastructure, the experience is one of complete control. You're responsible for the UI, the data storage, and how the reports are rendered. This appeals to those who prefer to build their own custom dashboards or integrate DMARC data into existing monitoring systems rather than relying on a vendor's interface.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI typically provides support through documentation, email, and potentially a ticketing system for its paid users. Based on our experience, the documentation is comprehensive, helping users troubleshoot common issues and understand the platform's functionalities.
For free tier users, support is generally community-driven or limited to basic resources. While a single review suggests a positive experience, we found that direct assistance scales with the chosen plan, meaning enterprises would likely receive dedicated support channels.
Support for Fraudmarc Community Edition is exclusively through its community forum. This model relies on peer-to-peer assistance, where users help each other with setup, troubleshooting, and best practices. There is no direct vendor support channel for the CE product itself.
This approach means users must be self-reliant or prepared to engage with a community to resolve issues. While open-source communities can be vibrant and helpful, response times and the depth of assistance can vary. It's a trade-off for the control and cost-free nature of the software.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is well-suited for a broad range of users, from SMBs seeking a managed DMARC reporting solution to enterprise-level organizations requiring advanced multi-policy monitoring. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for teams that may not have dedicated email security specialists.
MSPs (Managed Service Providers) could also find value in Report-URI's capabilities for managing DMARC for multiple clients, though the pricing structure for such use cases would need careful evaluation. It offers a balance of ease of use and powerful data analysis, making it a strong contender for most businesses.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is ideal for highly technical users, developers, and organizations with a strong preference for open-source software and self-hosting. It's particularly suitable for those who want absolute control over their data and infrastructure, and who possess the expertise to deploy and maintain the solution.
For SMBs without dedicated IT or DevOps teams, or for MSPs looking for an out-of-the-box solution to manage many clients, Fraudmarc CE would likely be too demanding. It's a powerful tool for the right niche, but that niche prioritizes customization and technical autonomy over simplicity and managed services.

How does Report-URI compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback, as noted by users, can be the difficulty in managing or deleting old trackers, especially if they are still receiving traffic from CDNs. This can lead to persistent data points that are hard to remove. For Fraudmarc Community Edition, the significant technical overhead for setup and maintenance, coupled with community-only support, means it's not a solution for everyone.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI requires you to contact their sales team for specific pricing, while Fraudmarc Community Edition is offered for free, with paid services available upon contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Report-URI vs Fraudmarc Community Edition DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped