Does Report-URI offer a free DMARC monitoring option?

Yes, Report-URI provides a free tier that allows users to monitor a limited number of domains for DMARC reports, making it accessible for initial setup and smaller needs.

Is Fraudmarc suitable for very small businesses?

Fraudmarc's focused approach to DMARC makes it suitable for small businesses seeking a straightforward solution to improve email security, although pricing details need to be acquired directly.

Which product is better for managing multiple security policies, not just DMARC?

Report-URI is the stronger choice for managing multiple security policies, as it integrates reporting for CSP, HPKP, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT alongside DMARC.

Do either of these platforms help with SPF flattening?

Yes, both Report-URI and Fraudmarc offer SPF flattening capabilities to help organizations overcome the common 10-lookup limit for SPF records, ensuring proper authentication.

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Report-URI offers comprehensive DMARC reporting alongside other security report analysis, such as CSP (Content Security Policy) and HPKP (HTTP Public Key Pinning). This multi-faceted approach provides a holistic view of a domain's security posture, extending beyond just email.

The platform provides detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, giving us granular insight into email streams. Its strength lies in its ability to consolidate various security reports into a single, actionable dashboard, which is excellent for teams managing multiple security policies.

Fraudmarc focuses primarily on DMARC, providing tools specifically designed for policy implementation, enforcement, and compliance. Its features are geared towards simplifying the DMARC journey, making it accessible for organizations to achieve DMARC enforcement.

We found Fraudmarc's feature set to be highly specialized for DMARC, offering clear pathways to configure DMARC records, monitor authentication results, and identify email threats. It includes capabilities for SPF and DKIM alignment, which are crucial for DMARC success.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Report-URI's interface, while powerful, can feel a bit dense due to the breadth of security policies it covers. Navigating between DMARC, CSP, and other reports requires a learning curve, especially for new users who are solely focused on email security.

We appreciate the detailed data visualizations, but the sheer volume of information can sometimes be overwhelming. Setting up new monitors and understanding all the configuration options demands a certain level of technical expertise.

Fraudmarc offers a more streamlined and intuitive user experience, particularly for DMARC management. The dashboard is clean, focusing on key DMARC metrics and actionable insights, which helps users quickly understand their email authentication status.

We found its guided setup process and simplified reporting very helpful for getting started and for ongoing monitoring. The platform minimizes complexity, allowing users to move towards DMARC enforcement with less friction, which is a significant advantage for those less familiar with intricate email protocols.

Which product has the best support

Support

Report-URI provides support through documentation, a community forum, and direct email support for paying customers. The knowledge base is extensive, covering a wide range of security policies, which is beneficial for self-service troubleshooting.

Our experience indicates that responses to direct support inquiries are generally thorough, though perhaps not as immediate as some users might desire. The depth of their documentation often means we can find answers without needing to contact support directly.

Fraudmarc offers support primarily through online resources, including FAQs, guides, and email support. Given its more focused scope, the support materials are directly relevant to DMARC implementation and optimization.

We found Fraudmarc's support to be responsive and helpful for DMARC-specific questions. Their team seems well-versed in the nuances of email authentication, providing clear guidance for setting up records and interpreting reports.

Who should use each product

Suitability

Report-URI is highly suitable for organizations, especially enterprises, with advanced security needs that extend beyond DMARC. If you are managing multiple security policies like CSP, DMARC, and others, Report-URI provides a centralized platform for monitoring.

For MSPs (managed service providers) and larger SMBs with technical expertise, Report-URI offers the depth and breadth needed for comprehensive domain security management. Its technical focus might be a steeper learning curve for smaller, less technically inclined SMBs.

Fraudmarc is an excellent fit for SMBs and organizations that need a straightforward, dedicated DMARC solution without the added complexity of other security protocols. It simplifies the path to DMARC enforcement, making it ideal for those prioritizing email security quickly.

MSPs serving clients primarily focused on DMARC compliance will find Fraudmarc's focused approach beneficial. Enterprises seeking a specialized DMARC tool that integrates cleanly with their existing security stack might also find value in its simplicity.

How does Report-URI compare with Fraudmarc?

DMARC report analysis

Aggregating and interpreting DMARC reports to show email authentication results.

Source detection

Identifying legitimate and illegitimate sending sources based on DMARC data.

Forward detection

Ability to identify email forwarding that can impact DMARC authentication.

Spoof detection

Tools to detect and prevent email spoofing attacks on your domain.

Notifications and alerts

Automated alerts for DMARC policy changes, unauthorized senders, or report issues.

Reporting

Customizable reports and dashboards for DMARC performance and enforcement status.

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data and management functions.

Not a primary feature

Multi-tenancy

Ability to manage multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface, useful for agencies or MSPs.

Less focus on this

SPF flattening

Automated solutions to resolve SPF 10-lookup limit issues.

Hosted DMARC

Service to host and manage your DMARC record to simplify configuration.

Available through record features

Configuration assistance offered

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI) implementation.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Monitoring and reporting for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) and TLS Reporting (TLS-RPT).

Not a primary offering

Blocklists and reputation

Monitoring domain reputation and checking against email blocklists (or blacklists).

As part of broader security

Not directly offered

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance for DMARC configuration or troubleshooting.

DNS monitoring

Monitoring DNS records for changes or issues affecting email deliverability.

As part of broader security

Not a core feature

Self hostable

Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on private infrastructure.

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free trial or a permanently free usage tier.

No explicit free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's main drawback is its potential complexity for users solely focused on DMARC, as its broad security reporting capabilities can lead to a busy interface. Fraudmarc, while focused, lacks the broader security monitoring (like CSP or MTA-STS) that some organizations may desire, and it does not currently offer a free tier to test the waters.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

5 / 5(1)

0 / 5(0)

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Both Report-URI and Fraudmarc require contacting their sales teams for specific pricing details, indicating custom enterprise-focused pricing models rather than transparent, tiered plans.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Enterprise

Over 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or Fraudmarc?

Try Suped

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services

DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix

Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly

Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail

Get started - free

Suped

Report-URI vs Fraudmarc

Feature set

User experience

Support

Suitability

How does Report-URI compare with Fraudmarc?

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

What makes Suped different

Frequently asked questions

Suped