What is the main difference between Report-URI and ELK DMARC?

Report-URI is a cloud-based, managed DMARC reporting service, offering a user-friendly interface and comprehensive features as a SaaS product. ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution that requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain, offering greater customization and control over your data.

Does ELK DMARC have a free option?

Yes, ELK DMARC is an open-source project and is free to use. However, you will incur costs for the underlying infrastructure (like servers and cloud resources) required to host and run the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana).

Is Report-URI suitable for small businesses?

Yes, Report-URI is well-suited for small businesses due to its intuitive interface, managed service approach, and comprehensive reporting. It offers a free tier for one domain, making it accessible for initial DMARC implementation without significant upfront investment or technical overhead.

Can I get dedicated support for ELK DMARC?

ELK DMARC relies on community support and its GitHub repository for assistance. There is no dedicated support team as it is an open-source project. Users typically troubleshoot issues themselves or seek help from the wider ELK stack community.

Which product offers SPF flattening?

Report-URI offers SPF flattening as a feature to help manage the 10-DNS-lookup limit for SPF records. ELK DMARC does not natively provide this functionality.

Compare product functionality

Feature set

ELK DMARC

Report-URI provides a comprehensive suite for DMARC management, including detailed aggregate and forensic report analysis. We found its interface adept at parsing complex XML data into understandable visualizations, making it easier to pinpoint DMARC compliance issues.

Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI integrates with additional email security standards like MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. It offers SPF flattening to avoid the 10-DNS-lookup limit and can help detect sending sources and potential spoofing attempts. The platform excels in providing a consolidated view of your email ecosystem.

ELK DMARC, leveraging the Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana (ELK) stack, is a powerful open-source tool for DMARC reporting. We observed its strength in raw data processing and flexible visualization capabilities, allowing us to build custom dashboards to analyze DMARC aggregate reports (RUA).

While primarily focused on DMARC report ingestion and visualization, ELK DMARC allows for deep dives into data, helping identify sending sources, DMARC alignment issues, and potential threats. Its open-source nature means advanced users can extend its functionality through custom scripts and integrations within the ELK ecosystem.

ELK DMARC

How easy is each product to use

User experience

ELK DMARC

Report-URI offers a polished, user-friendly interface that simplifies DMARC report analysis for both novices and experts. The dashboards are intuitive, presenting complex data in easily digestible charts and graphs. We found the setup process straightforward, requiring minimal technical expertise to get started.

Navigating through reports, configuring alerts, and understanding compliance trends are all streamlined. The platform prioritizes ease of use, providing clear explanations and guidance throughout the DMARC journey, making it a good choice for those who prefer a managed service experience.

ELK DMARC’s user experience is inherently tied to the ELK stack. For users familiar with Kibana, the interface is powerful and flexible, allowing for extensive customization of dashboards and visualizations. However, for those new to the ELK stack, there is a significant learning curve.

The initial setup and configuration require considerable technical knowledge, including Docker, Elasticsearch, and Linux administration. Once deployed, creating meaningful visualizations often demands a solid understanding of data querying and Kibana's features, making it less 'plug-and-play' than a typical SaaS solution.

ELK DMARC

Which product has the best support

Support

ELK DMARC

Report-URI provides direct support channels, typically through email or a ticketing system. We found the support team to be knowledgeable and responsive, assisting with both technical setup and DMARC-related queries. Documentation is also readily available and comprehensive, helping users troubleshoot common issues.

As a commercial SaaS product, Report-URI's support is part of the service, ensuring assistance is available when needed. This is a significant advantage for organizations that require guided support in their DMARC implementation and ongoing monitoring.

ELK DMARC, being an open-source project, relies on community support, GitHub issues, and self-help. While the project creator (evermight) is active and provides initial guidance, there isn't a dedicated support team in the traditional sense. We observed that solutions to problems often come from the community.

Users must be comfortable with independent problem-solving and leveraging the wider ELK stack community for assistance. This model is great for those with in-house expertise and a desire for control, but less suitable for organizations seeking immediate, dedicated support.

ELK DMARC

Who should use each product

Suitability

ELK DMARC

Report-URI is highly suitable for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and enterprises seeking a managed, user-friendly DMARC reporting solution. Its intuitive interface and comprehensive feature set make it ideal for organizations without extensive in-house email security expertise. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also find its multi-domain management capabilities beneficial for their clients.

We found it particularly good for those who want to quickly achieve DMARC enforcement and monitor their email channels with minimal administrative overhead. If you value a streamlined experience and robust, out-of-the-box functionality, Report-URI is a strong contender.

ELK DMARC is best suited for enterprises with strong internal IT and security teams who prefer self-hosting and have expertise in the ELK stack and Docker. It provides maximum control over data and infrastructure, which is appealing to organizations with strict data residency requirements or specific customization needs.

For SMBs and MSPs without the necessary technical resources or a desire for self-management, ELK DMARC might prove too complex and resource-intensive to deploy and maintain. It's an excellent choice for those who value flexibility and open-source principles over a fully managed service (SaaS).

ELK DMARC

How does Report-URI compare with ELK DMARC?

ELK DMARC

DMARC report analysis

Ability to parse and present DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.

Source detection

Helps identify legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.

Forward detection

Identifies email forwarding paths and their impact on DMARC.

Spoof detection

Detects emails failing DMARC authentication that may be spoofing your domain.

Notifications and alerts

Configurable alerts for DMARC policy changes or anomalies.

Via Kibana or custom ELK stack integrations

Reporting

Dashboards and customizable reports for DMARC performance.

Highly customizable via Kibana

API

Provides an API for programmatic access to DMARC data.

Uses Elasticsearch API internally, but no dedicated DMARC API

Multi-tenancy

Capability to manage multiple domains or clients from a single account.

Requires separate deployments or complex setup per tenant

SPF flattening

Automatically combines SPF records to stay within DNS lookup limits.

Hosted DMARC

Managed DMARC reporting service, no self-hosting required.

Requires self-hosting and management

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Monitoring for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT policies.

Blocklists and reputation

Integration with email blocklists or reputation services.

AI copilot

Uses artificial intelligence for insights or automated actions.

DNS monitoring

Monitors the health and configuration of relevant DNS records (e.g., DMARC, SPF, DKIM).

Self hostable

Can be installed and run on your own infrastructure.

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free option to try or use the service.

Free tier for one domain

Open-source, free to use (excluding hosting costs)

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback is the occasional difficulty in deleting trackers if they are still receiving traffic, especially after using CDN networks. This can be a minor annoyance for cleanup. ELK DMARC, while powerful, requires significant technical expertise for setup and maintenance, and it lacks the dedicated support and many advanced features (like SPF flattening, BIMI, MTA-STS) that come with a commercial SaaS offering.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

5 / 5(1)

ELK DMARC

0 / 5(0)

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI requires contacting sales for pricing, while ELK DMARC is open-source, meaning you primarily incur costs for hosting and maintaining the underlying infrastructure.

ELK DMARC

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Self-hosted, hardware costs

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Self-hosted, hardware costs (min 8GB RAM)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Self-hosted, hardware costs

Enterprise

Over 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Self-hosted, hardware costs

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or ELK DMARC?

Try Suped

ELK DMARC

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services

DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix

Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly

Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail

Get started - free

Suped

Report-URI vs ELK DMARC

Feature set

User experience

Support

Suitability

How does Report-URI compare with ELK DMARC?

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

What makes Suped different

Frequently asked questions

Suped