Suped

Report-URI vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose Report-URI for focused URI reporting, choose DMARCAnalyzer for broader DMARC compliance tools.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI began as a versatile tool primarily focused on Content Security Policy (CSP) and Public Key Pinning (PKP) reporting, later expanding to include DMARC. Its interface is designed for presenting raw report data in an accessible manner, allowing users to delve deep into specific security policies. We find it particularly strong in granular report aggregation and display capabilities.
While robust, its DMARC features are integrated into a broader security reporting platform. This means DMARC analysis might feel like one of many features, rather than the primary focus. However, it provides excellent visibility into DMARC data, helping identify authentication failures and legitimate sending sources with precision.
DMARCAnalyzer, now integrated with Mimecast, offers a dedicated DMARC management platform that covers the entire DMARC lifecycle. Its feature set emphasizes ease of use for DMARC adoption, from initial setup to full enforcement. We have found their guided workflows and clear visualizations particularly helpful for those new to DMARC.
The platform excels in providing actionable insights and simplifying the path to DMARC enforcement. It includes integrated tools for SPF, DKIM, and BIMI, offering a comprehensive suite for email authentication. Its integration with Mimecast also suggests a strong focus on enterprise-level email security solutions and broader threat protection.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Report-URI involves understanding its various reporting types, as DMARC is one component alongside CSP and PKP. The interface is highly functional and provides extensive data filtering capabilities, which is excellent for power users. However, for a user solely focused on DMARC, the initial learning curve can be steeper due to the breadth of features.
We appreciate the detailed drill-down options available for DMARC reports, allowing us to scrutinize individual email streams. The dashboard provides a good overview, but mastering the filtering and custom reporting requires some dedicated time. It's a tool primarily built for security professionals who are comfortable with in-depth data exploration.
DMARCAnalyzer offers a more streamlined and intuitive user experience specifically tailored for DMARC management. The dashboards are clear, providing immediate visual feedback on DMARC compliance rates and identified threats. We found the step-by-step guidance for DMARC implementation to be a significant advantage, especially for organizations beginning their DMARC journey.
The platform simplifies complex DMARC data into easily digestible charts and graphs, making it straightforward to identify trends and authentication issues. Its singular focus on DMARC makes the user flow more direct, minimizing distractions and allowing users to quickly address their email authentication needs. The reporting is generally well-organized and user-friendly.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Support for Report-URI is typically provided through extensive documentation, community forums, and a ticketing system. Given its technical nature, the resources are geared towards users with a strong understanding of email security protocols. We have found the documentation to be thorough for those who prefer a self-service approach.
Their support structure aligns with a self-serve model, where detailed guides and FAQs empower users to find solutions independently. For more complex issues, direct support is available, but response times might vary depending on the urgency and plan level. It's a pragmatic approach for a tool that caters to technically adept users.
DMARCAnalyzer, as part of Mimecast, benefits from a more structured and potentially extensive support infrastructure. They offer various support channels, including dedicated account managers, online resources, and direct technical support. We've experienced a more guided support process, which is highly beneficial for organizations requiring hands-on assistance.
The availability of professional services for DMARC deployment and ongoing management is a key differentiator. This level of support can be invaluable for enterprises with complex email ecosystems or those needing expert guidance through their DMARC journey. Their support caters to a broader range of technical expertise, from beginners to advanced users.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is highly suitable for technical users, security engineers, and smaller to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) who have a good grasp of DMARC and other web security policies. It's also a strong contender for those who appreciate direct access to granular data and prefer a hands-on approach to analysis.
For MSPs (Managed Service Providers), it could work if they have a strong internal team to manage multiple clients individually, as its multi-tenancy features are not as prominent. Enterprise-level organizations with dedicated security teams might find its deep data insights valuable, but may need to integrate it with other tools for a complete email security solution.
DMARCAnalyzer is well-suited for businesses of all sizes, from SMBs to large enterprises, particularly those seeking a comprehensive, guided DMARC implementation and management solution. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for less technical users, while its advanced features cater to security professionals.
For MSPs, its robust multi-tenancy capabilities make it an excellent choice for managing DMARC for numerous clients efficiently. Enterprise clients benefit from its integration with Mimecast's broader security offerings and its professional services, offering a scalable and well-supported path to DMARC enforcement.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARCAnalyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI, while powerful for data enthusiasts, can feel less intuitive for those solely focused on DMARC, often presenting a broader range of security data. Its multi-tenancy capabilities are less developed, which might be a drawback for MSPs. DMARCAnalyzer, on the other hand, excels in user-friendliness but its pricing structure for comprehensive features might require direct inquiry, potentially leading to less transparent costs upfront.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI offers a free tier with usage-based paid plans, while DMARCAnalyzer (Mimecast) relies on a quote-based system, though it provides a free trial.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Report-URI vs DMARCAnalyzer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped