Report-URI offers a robust and highly specialized platform primarily focused on DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) reporting and monitoring. We found its core strength lies in detailed DMARC data aggregation and analysis, providing granular insights into email authentication results.
The platform excels at distilling complex DMARC XML reports into easily digestible formats, allowing us to quickly identify unauthorized senders, legitimate sources, and potential spoofing attempts. It provides a clear overview of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication passes and failures.
DMARC360, as part of a broader cybersecurity suite (CTM360), provides DMARC reporting alongside a wider array of digital risk protection features. Its DMARC capabilities are comprehensive, but they are integrated into a platform designed for external attack surface management, brand protection, and anti-phishing.
We observed that DMARC360’s strength lies in its ability to connect DMARC insights with other threat intelligence, offering a more holistic view of an organization’s external security posture. This includes capabilities for breach detection and takedown services, which extend beyond DMARC's scope.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
The user experience of Report-URI is straightforward for those familiar with DMARC concepts. We found the interface to be functional and direct, prioritizing data presentation over elaborate design. Setting up DMARC records and integrating with the platform is a relatively quick process.
Navigation is logical, allowing us to drill down into specific reports and data points efficiently. While not overly flashy, the clarity of information and the ability to customize views make it an effective tool for dedicated DMARC management.
DMARC360 presents a more extensive dashboard due to its integrated nature within a larger cybersecurity platform. We noted that while the overall platform is described as user-friendly by many, the sheer volume of modules and features can initially lead to a steeper learning curve.
Once accustomed to the layout, navigating the DMARC-specific reports is intuitive. The platform aims to consolidate various security aspects, which can be beneficial but might require a deeper dive to leverage all its DMARC and related threat intelligence capabilities effectively.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI offers support primarily through its documentation and community resources. We found that for common issues and understanding the DMARC protocol, the existing guides are quite helpful. Direct support channels are typically reserved for paid tiers or more complex technical queries.
For users who are comfortable with DMARC and prefer self-service, this model works well. However, those new to DMARC or requiring extensive hands-on assistance might find the initial learning phase a bit more independent.
DMARC360, as part of CTM360, is widely praised for its responsive and professional customer support. We've seen numerous mentions of their team being highly cooperative, knowledgeable, and quick to address queries and provide in-depth analysis.
Their support model often includes proactive monitoring and hands-on assistance, which is a significant advantage, especially for organizations dealing with complex cybersecurity landscapes. This makes them a strong partner for managing digital risks beyond just DMARC.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is ideal for organizations or individuals whose primary need is focused DMARC reporting and analysis. It's particularly well-suited for users who prefer a dedicated tool without the overhead of additional security features.
It's a good fit for SMBs (small to medium businesses) looking for an effective, no-frills DMARC solution, and for enterprises that have existing broader security platforms and only need DMARC data ingested or monitored separately. MSPs (managed service providers) might find it useful for managing DMARC for multiple clients, though it may lack some multi-tenancy specific features.
MSP suitability: Good, if integrating into existing dashboards.
Enterprise suitability: Good, for DMARC-specific needs.
SMB suitability: Excellent, for dedicated DMARC focus.
DMARC360 is best for organizations seeking a more integrated digital risk protection platform where DMARC is one component among many. It caters to those who appreciate a consolidated view of external threats, including brand protection and attack surface management.
This platform is particularly strong for enterprises and MSPs managing complex cybersecurity environments, as it offers a unified approach to external threat intelligence, including deep scanning and takedown capabilities. SMBs might find it comprehensive but potentially more feature-rich than their immediate DMARC-only requirements.
MSP suitability: Excellent, for comprehensive client security.
Enterprise suitability: Excellent, for holistic digital risk management.
SMB suitability: Good, for those needing broader security.
How does Report-URI compare with DMARC360?
DMARC report analysis
Detailed parsing and visualization of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Strong, core functionality with clear visualizations.
Comprehensive, integrated into a broader threat platform.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and fraudulent email sending sources.
Accurate identification of email sources.
Excellent, integrated with threat intelligence.
Forward detection
Mechanisms to detect and account for email forwarding that can impact DMARC.
Good handling of forwarded email scenarios.
Effective, helps maintain DMARC alignment.
Spoof detection
Identifies email spoofing attempts using DMARC data.
Clear flagging of spoofing activity.
Robust, leverages wider threat intel.
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for DMARC policy changes, anomalies, or high failure rates.
Configurable alerts for DMARC events.
Proactive and actionable alerts.
Reporting
Generation of custom or scheduled DMARC compliance and security reports.
Standard and customizable reporting options.
Comprehensive reporting across digital risks.
API
Application Programming Interface for integrating DMARC data with other systems.
Available for broader platform integration.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing DMARC for multiple distinct organizations or domains.
Supports multiple domains within one account.
Designed for managing multiple entities.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record lookup limits.
Tools to assist with SPF complexity.
Integrated SPF management.
Hosted DMARC
Provides hosted DMARC records management.
Includes hosted DMARC record creation.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
BIMI setup and monitoring included.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring for Mail Transfer Agent-Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) and TLS Reporting.
Offers MTA-STS and TLS-RPT monitoring.
Blocklists and reputation
Checks against email blocklists (or blacklists) and monitors sender reputation.
Monitors blocklist (blacklist) status.
Comprehensive reputation monitoring.
AI copilot
AI-driven assistance for DMARC analysis and remediation.
DNS monitoring
General DNS record monitoring beyond DMARC.
Monitors exposed digital assets and misconfigurations.
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on private infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Free tier available.
Community Edition with free access.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI's primary drawback is its specialized focus, which means it doesn't offer the broader digital risk protection found in platforms like DMARC360. For users seeking an all-in-one security solution, this might necessitate integrating Report-URI with other tools. We also noted a specific criticism regarding the difficulty of deleting trackers that are still receiving traffic. DMARC360, while powerful, can initially present a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set. We found some users mention the interface isn't always user-friendly, and filtering features can be confusing, although support is generally excellent.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
4.7 / 5(360)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
3.5 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alertsWhat do you dislike about CTM360?While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impactWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It's Good
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy.What do you dislike about CTM360?The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed.What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to useWhat do you dislike about CTM360?Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordinglyWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanningbrand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaksWhat do you dislike about CTM360?Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilitiesWhat problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Review CTM360 after using for 1 Year period.
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about CTM360?Most helpful from CTM360 is take down phishing domain very fast for my customer and could finding and detect Brand Impersonation focus on Social media app with fake content.What do you dislike about CTM360?Least helpful is data exposure on repository with another platform such as Gitlab , Bitbucket in case some customer using above tool will could not detect.What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you?In the past take down period is big issue for my customer because take around 5-7days and customer have complain on this issue , However when changing to use "Brand Protection" of CTM360 service , CTM360 team could help my team action quickly on take down phishing URL or fake content URL related with my customer domain name. average complete action take down around 2-3 days.
Watthanachai K.
Consulting IT Specialist Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
Report-URI offers a tiered pricing model with a free option, while DMARC360 has a free Community Edition but requires direct contact for full pricing details.
5 / 5(1)
