Suped

Report-URI vs DMARC Visualizer

Choose Report-URI for managed service, choose DMARC Visualizer for full control.
DMARC Visualizer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers comprehensive DMARC reporting, alongside CSP and other security header monitoring. It provides a structured interface for viewing DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, making it easy to identify email authentication issues and potential threats. Its dashboard is well-organized, presenting data in various charts and tables for quick analysis.
We found its reporting capabilities to be robust, allowing for detailed drill-downs into specific sending sources, authentication results, and policy actions. The platform also includes features for managing domains, configuring DMARC records, and setting up alerts, making it a powerful tool for ongoing DMARC management and enforcement.
DMARC Visualizer is an open-source solution that leverages tools like parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana to provide DMARC reporting. While it doesn't offer a ready-to-use SaaS interface like Report-URI, it provides significant flexibility for users comfortable with self-hosting and configuring these components.
Its feature set is largely dependent on the user's ability to set up and customize the underlying tools. This means a technically proficient user can build a highly tailored DMARC reporting system, including advanced visualizations and data retention policies, but it requires hands-on involvement with infrastructure management.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Using Report-URI is straightforward for anyone familiar with web-based dashboards. The setup involves adding a DMARC record that points to Report-URI, and data starts flowing in relatively quickly. The interface is intuitive, with clear navigation and visual cues that help in understanding complex DMARC data.
We appreciate the thought put into the data presentation, making it accessible even for those who are not DMARC experts. The ability to filter and sort reports, along with customizable views, allows us to focus on the most critical information, streamlining the process of DMARC policy enforcement.
The user experience for DMARC Visualizer is fundamentally different. It's not a plug-and-play solution, as it requires setting up and maintaining multiple open-source components, including a database (Elasticsearch) and a visualization tool (Grafana). This demands a significant level of technical expertise and time investment.
Once set up, the actual interaction is primarily through Grafana, which offers powerful dashboarding capabilities but also has its own learning curve. For users who enjoy customizing every aspect of their monitoring stack, this hands-on approach can be rewarding. However, for those seeking simplicity, it can be a steep climb.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers support primarily through its documentation, community forums, and direct contact options for paid plans. We found the documentation to be quite thorough, covering most common questions and setup procedures. For more complex issues, the ability to reach out directly to their team is a significant advantage.
Our experience suggests that their support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial when dealing with email security issues that can have a direct impact on deliverability. This level of professional support adds considerable value, especially for businesses where email continuity is critical.
As an open-source project, DMARC Visualizer's support ecosystem relies heavily on the community. Users typically find help through GitHub issues, project documentation, and community forums related to parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. There is no dedicated support team in the traditional commercial sense.
This model means that troubleshooting often involves self-reliance and leveraging the collective knowledge of the open-source community. While a strong community can be incredibly helpful, it's not the same as having a guaranteed service level agreement (SLA) or direct access to expert assistance, which might be a concern for some organizations.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is well-suited for a broad range of users, from SMBs to enterprise clients, who need a reliable, managed DMARC reporting solution without the burden of infrastructure management. Its user-friendly interface and robust feature set make it ideal for organizations that want to quickly implement and monitor DMARC.
It is also a strong choice for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) looking to offer DMARC monitoring to their clients, thanks to its multi-domain capabilities and straightforward management. Enterprises will appreciate its scalability and professional support, ensuring their email security remains uncompromised.
DMARC Visualizer is best for technically advanced users, IT departments, or organizations with specific data sovereignty or customization requirements. It's a great fit for those who prefer to host solutions on-premises and have the internal expertise to set up and maintain Elasticsearch and Grafana.
While not directly aimed at MSPs in a commercial sense, a technically proficient MSP could, in theory, deploy and manage instances for clients. However, it's generally less suitable for typical SMBs or enterprises seeking an off-the-shelf solution, due to the significant technical overhead required for deployment and ongoing management.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARC Visualizer?

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback appears to be an occasional difficulty in deleting trackers if they are still actively receiving traffic, especially in environments utilizing CDN networks. This can lead to persistent data flow when attempting to decommission a tracking service. DMARC Visualizer, on the other hand, presents a different set of challenges, mainly stemming from its self-hosted, open-source nature. The significant upfront effort and ongoing technical expertise required for setup, configuration, and maintenance can be a barrier for many organizations looking for a ready-to-use solution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Monitoring for PROs
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks. Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system. It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI offers a tiered subscription model with pricing available upon request, catering to various organizational sizes, whereas DMARC Visualizer is a free, open-source solution that requires self-hosting and infrastructure investment.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARC Visualizer?
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Report-URI vs DMARC Visualizer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped