Report-URI vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026
Report-URI
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested Report-URI and DMARC-SRG for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Report-URI was stronger for managed reporting, retention, alerting, and business handoff, while DMARC-SRG was the better fit for technical teams that want a free self-hosted parser and accept manual operations.
Report-URI
Managed DMARC and web security reporting
Starts at
$54.99 / month
Best fit
Security teams that want a hosted reporting platform
In one line
Report-URI gave us clearer retention, alerting, exports, and account controls, but its public pricing is not DMARC-specific.
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosted DMARC report parsing
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical operators comfortable maintaining PHP, database, mailbox, and cron jobs
In one line
DMARC-SRG parsed aggregate reports reliably in our lab, but sender ownership, alerts, policy movement, and support handoff stayed manual.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick Report-URI for managed reporting, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control
Pick Report-URI if
Best for security teams that want hosted reporting and retention without running their own parser
Added the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without server work.
Separated Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic more clearly than a raw report viewer.
Business-tier alerting and exports made the unauthorized spoof sample easier to hand to security operations.
From $54.99 / month
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Best for technical teams that want a free self-hosted DMARC aggregate report viewer
Handled uploaded and mailbox-ingested aggregate reports once PHP, MariaDB, IMAP, and cleanup jobs were configured.
Showed DKIM and SPF detail for the forwarded mail SPF failure, but left explanation and owner notes to us.
Worked for the parked domain with low volume because storage and retention were under our control.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
A third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Use guided fixes when a source like SendGrid or Mailchimp passes authentication but fails the domain-match check.
Prioritize automated issue detection and cleaner alert quality when unknown senders need fast classification.
For MSP workflows, check account separation, client handoff, and published starter pricing before committing.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Report-URI
DMARC-SRG
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, grouping, and review flow.
Supported, hosted workflow.
Supported, self-hosted parser.
Supported.
Source detection
Identification of sending services and ownership clues.
Partial, needed manual owner notes.
Manual workflow.
Supported.
Forward detection
Ability to explain SPF failure caused by forwarding.
Partial, clearer with drilldowns.
Visible, manual explanation.
Supported.
Spoof detection
Identification of unauthorized mail using the domain.
Supported through reporting and alerts.
Visible in reports, manual triage.
Supported.
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerting for changes and failures.
Paid tier for stronger alerting.
Not built in.
Supported.
Reporting
Recurring or exportable reporting for stakeholders.
Supported, exports available.
Summary reports, self-hosted.
Supported.
API
Programmatic access for integration or automation.
Business tier and above.
No dedicated API found.
Supported.
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for teams, clients, or business units.
Team access on paid tiers.
Manual separation.
Supported.
SPF flattening
Managed SPF record simplification.
Not tested.
Not supported.
Supported.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and changes.
Not tested.
Not supported.
Supported.
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF hosting and record maintenance.
Not tested.
Not supported.
Supported.
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not tested.
Not supported.
Supported.
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation monitoring.
Not DMARC-focused in our test.
Not supported.
Supported.
Automatic issue detection
Detection of misconfigurations without manual report reading.
Partial, alert driven.
Manual workflow.
Supported.
AI copilot
AI assistance for interpretation and next steps.
Enterprise or add on.
Not supported.
Supported.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for record changes and drift.
Not tested.
Not supported.
Supported.
Self hostable
Can be deployed and maintained on your own infrastructure.
Hosted SaaS.
Supported.
Not supported.
Free trial/free tier
No-cost entry path for evaluation.
30-day free trial.
$0 software cost.
Free plan available.
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
Each product was scored against a fixed editorial rubric built around the same three domains, senders, authentication cases, and operational tasks. Higher is better in every row, and a dead 0.0 means the feature was not supported in our test.
Report-URI scored higher for managed operations, while DMARC-SRG held up where self-hosted parsing was the job
Report-URI moved faster through onboarding, drilldowns, exports, alert review, and stakeholder handoff. DMARC-SRG gave us control over ingestion and retention, but the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, and unauthorized spoof sample required manual interpretation. The gap widened in policy movement, integrations, account separation, and support expectations.
Report-URI score
55.5/100
DMARC-SRG score
26/100
Report-URI
55.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
DMARC-SRG
26/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
2.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
4.0
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
3.0
Feature set
Managed depth vs parser control
Report-URI has the broader managed feature set. DMARC-SRG stays focused on parsing.
Report-URI was the stronger choice when the job included alerts, exports, account controls, and business handoff. DMARC-SRG was useful when we only needed to ingest aggregate reports and inspect SPF and DKIM outcomes. If guided fixes or automated issue detection matter, treat that as a separate buying criterion because neither tool removed enough manual classification work during the unknown sender case.
Report-URI
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid mismatch easier to explain
Exports supported handoff
DMARC-SRG
Google Workspace reports parsed
Mailchimp needed manual ownership
Forwarded SPF visible
Report-URI handled Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender with clearer grouping than DMARC-SRG. The Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace sources were easy to separate, SendGrid and Mailchimp needed domain-match review, and the SPF pass with visible from mismatch was easier to explain through drilldowns than through raw XML-style inspection.
DMARC-SRG focused on report ingestion, stored views, filtering, and DKIM/SPF result review. It showed the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain and the forwarded mail SPF failure, but it did not turn the unknown sender into a named business owner or push us toward a policy decision without our own notes.
User experience
Hosted workflow vs operator workflow
Report-URI was easier to operate day to day. DMARC-SRG was transparent but manual.
Report-URI gave us a clearer path through domain setup, report review, and exports after the DNS records were in place. DMARC-SRG felt direct and predictable once deployed, but deployment, mailbox ingestion, cleanup, and interpretation remained administrator tasks.
Report-URI
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender isolated faster
Forwarding story clearer
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosting required care
Unknown sender stayed manual
Forwarded SPF visible
In Report-URI, onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was mostly a DNS and verification exercise. The unknown sender was easier to isolate because we could move through reporting organization, source IP, authenticated result, and domain view without changing tools, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain to a non-DMARC stakeholder.
In DMARC-SRG, the UI was plain and useful after the parser, database, and mailbox intake worked. The parked domain was easy to monitor because there was little volume, but the corporate domain created more manual review work, especially when we had to explain why forwarded mail failed SPF yet did not prove spoofing.
Support
Vendor support vs community operation
Report-URI gives clearer support paths. DMARC-SRG depends on in-house ownership.
Report-URI was better suited to teams that need support expectations, escalation, and enterprise onboarding clarity. DMARC-SRG was acceptable for teams that can own the application, database, mailbox ingestion, backups, and security updates without a managed support path.
Report-URI
Support tiers are clearer
DNS handoff was cleaner
Enterprise path exists
DMARC-SRG
Internal admin required
No paid SLA found
Docs drive setup
Report-URI's public tiers made standard, priority, and enterprise support expectations easier to understand, even though DMARC-specific onboarding details were not fully separated in the public pricing. During DNS handoff, the hosted setup gave us a cleaner checklist for the three test domains and a more practical path for escalating the unauthorized spoof sample.
DMARC-SRG had no commercial support tier in the material we reviewed, so setup help came down to project documentation and internal skill. The DNS handoff was simple at the record level, but the enterprise onboarding question shifted to server hardening, mailbox access, database maintenance, and who would explain authentication failures to business owners.
Suitability
Business workflow vs self-hosted utility
Report-URI fits security teams better. DMARC-SRG fits operators who want control.
Report-URI made more sense for an organization that needs reporting, exports, and clearer handoff across domains. DMARC-SRG made more sense for a small technical team that accepts manual reviews and owns the server. For MSP workflows or alert quality, evaluate client grouping, recurring reports, ownership notes, and noise control before choosing either product.
Report-URI
Better enterprise handoff
Exports helped recurring reports
Client grouping still limited
DMARC-SRG
Good for small operators
Manual client separation
No MSP workflow layer
Report-URI handled account separation better than DMARC-SRG because team access and role-based access exist on paid tiers, and exports helped us prepare recurring reporting for the corporate domain and marketing subdomain. For MSP use, it still felt more like a security reporting product than a purpose-built client management console.
DMARC-SRG worked best for an SMB or technical operator with a small domain set and comfort maintaining the stack. Client handoff, domain grouping, account separation, and recurring stakeholder reports needed conventions outside the product, which made MSP and enterprise use harder in our 90-day test.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Report-URI
A hosted reporting platform for teams that want fewer infrastructure tasks
After 90 days, Report-URI felt like the more complete operational product. The corporate domain produced enough mixed Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic to test the reporting flow, and Report-URI made it easier to move between source evidence, domain views, alerts, and exports.
The biggest limitation was pricing interpretation for a DMARC-specific buyer. The public plans are centered on protected domains, monthly events, retention, and broader web security reporting, so we had to be careful when mapping our DMARC reporting needs to published tiers.
Where it wins
Fastest three-domain onboarding
Clearer source drilldowns
Useful exports for handoff
Better alerting on paid tiers
Where it lags
DMARC pricing not separated publicly
Hosted SPF was not covered
Hosted MTA-STS was not covered
MSP workflow depth was limited
Pricing
From $54.99 / month
Free tier
30-day free trial
Onboarding
Hosted DNS setup
G2 rating
5.0 / 5
DMARC-SRG
A self-hosted parser for teams that value control over managed workflow
After 90 days, DMARC-SRG felt like a practical internal utility rather than a managed DMARC program. It parsed aggregate reports, showed SPF and DKIM results, and let us inspect the parked domain without paying for software, but setup quality depended on the PHP, database, mailbox, and cron configuration.
The manual work became obvious on the corporate domain. The unknown sender needed our own classification, the forwarded SPF failure needed our explanation, and the unauthorized spoof sample needed a separate escalation path outside the application.
Where it wins
$0 software cost
Self-hosted data control
Useful SPF and DKIM views
No subscription feature gates
Where it lags
No built-in alerting
Manual source ownership
No hosted DNS workflow
No managed support path
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Free self-hosted
Onboarding
Manual deployment
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
Report-URI
DMARC-SRG
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$54.99 / month
Starter covers 1 protected domain and 100,000 monthly events, so it is the closest public fit.
$0
Software is free when self-hosted, with infrastructure and administrator time outside the license.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$109.99 / month
Professional covers 2 protected domains and 250,000 monthly events.
$0
No published software cap, but real capacity depends on hosting, database, mailbox, and retention settings.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Public self-service tiers stop at 5 protected domains, so 10 domains requires a custom plan or multiple arrangements.
$0
Software remains free, but this volume needs planned storage, cleanup, backups, and monitoring.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise pricing covers custom domains, events, retention, onboarding, SLA, and procurement requirements.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No paid enterprise tier was found, so support and operations must be handled internally.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Report-URI numbers are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026, using protected-domain tiers and event limits rather than DMARC-only volume. DMARC-SRG is listed as $0 software cost for self-hosting, with hosting and administrator time estimated by the buyer. Enterprise support pricing for DMARC-SRG was not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Turn source findings into fixes
Report-URI surfaced SendGrid and Mailchimp domain-match evidence, but the next action still needed interpretation. Suped ties sending sources to guided fixes so an owner can move the record or sender configuration forward.
Replace manual parser triage
DMARC-SRG showed the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure, but classification, explanation, and escalation stayed manual. Suped adds automated issue detection and clearer alert routing for those cases.
Handle clients with cleaner ownership
Report-URI had useful exports and DMARC-SRG had self-hosted control, but neither gave us the MSP workflow depth we wanted for account separation, recurring reports, and client handoff. Suped covers those workflows with published starter pricing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Report-URI or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
