Suped

Report-URI vs DMARC report viewer

Choose Report-URI for comprehensive features, DMARC report viewer for open-source flexibility.
DMARC report viewer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting features, including detailed aggregate and forensic report analysis. We found its dashboard to be intuitive, presenting a clear overview of DMARC compliance, sources, and threats. It excels in categorising sending sources, making it easier to identify legitimate senders versus potential spoofing attempts.
Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI integrates with other email security standards like BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT, providing a holistic view of email infrastructure health. The platform also offers SPF flattening, a valuable feature for domains approaching the 10-lookup limit.
The DMARC report viewer, being an open-source project, focuses on the fundamental task of parsing and visualising DMARC aggregate reports. It provides basic insights into DMARC compliance, showing SPF and DKIM authentication results, and identifying sending IPs. Its strength lies in its simplicity and directness in presenting raw DMARC data.
While it covers the basics of DMARC reporting, it doesn't extend to advanced features like forensic reports, BIMI, or MTA-STS monitoring. Users often need to supplement its capabilities with other tools or custom scripts to achieve a more comprehensive email security posture.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI provides a polished, modern user interface. Navigation is logical, and the dashboards are well-designed for data visualisation. For those new to DMARC, the initial setup and understanding the various reporting metrics might require a slight learning curve due to the depth of features offered. However, the comprehensive documentation helps.
Its strength in UX lies in its ability to present complex DMARC data in an actionable format, allowing users to quickly drill down into specific reports and identify issues. The customisable alerts also contribute positively to the overall user experience, ensuring critical issues are not missed.
DMARC report viewer offers a straightforward, functional interface. It's built for purpose, presenting DMARC data without excessive bells and whistles. For users comfortable with self-hosting and command-line interfaces, the deployment and initial configuration are manageable. We'd say it's more about function over form.
The user experience is heavily dependent on the user's technical proficiency. While its simplicity can be a benefit for quick data checks, the lack of advanced filters or interactive elements means deeper analysis often requires exporting data and using external tools. It's barebones, but effective for its primary goal.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI offers various support channels typical of a SaaS product. This typically includes documentation, email support, and sometimes live chat or community forums, depending on the subscription level. We've found their knowledge base to be quite thorough, addressing common questions and setup guides in detail.
For paying customers, access to direct support from their team ensures issues can be resolved efficiently. This level of professional support is crucial for organisations that rely heavily on DMARC for email security and compliance.
As an open-source project, DMARC report viewer primarily relies on community support. Users can typically find help through GitHub issues, project documentation, or relevant online forums. This means there isn't a dedicated support team to contact for immediate assistance or troubleshooting.
While the open-source community can be very helpful, response times and the depth of support can vary significantly. Users should be prepared to troubleshoot issues themselves or consult with their internal IT teams for deployment and maintenance. It's a DIY approach to support.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Report-URI is well-suited for businesses of all sizes, from SMBs to enterprises, that require a comprehensive and managed DMARC reporting solution. Its advanced features, professional support, and scalability make it an excellent choice for organisations with complex email ecosystems or those managing multiple domains. It's particularly strong for MSPs managing client DMARC configurations.
Enterprises will appreciate its robust reporting, API integrations, and support for other email security standards, allowing for a unified approach to email deliverability and security. SMBs can also leverage its free tier to get started, then scale up as their needs grow, benefiting from its user-friendly interface and detailed insights.
DMARC report viewer is best for individual users, small businesses, or organisations with strong in-house technical capabilities that prefer a self-hosted, open-source solution. It's ideal for those who want full control over their data and are comfortable managing their own infrastructure.
It's less suitable for MSPs looking for multi-tenancy or enterprise environments that demand professional support, extensive features, and compliance certifications out-of-the-box. While it can be adapted for larger scale, it requires significant custom development and maintenance, making it a niche choice for specific technical teams.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARC report viewer?

Logo
DMARC report viewer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback is its potential complexity for new users given its extensive feature set, and pricing can become a significant factor for organisations with very high email volumes. A reported issue is the difficulty in deleting trackers if they continue to detect traffic, especially when CDN networks are involved. DMARC report viewer, while free, demands significant technical expertise for self-hosting and lacks the advanced features, polished interface, and dedicated support found in commercial solutions. Its reliance on community support means less predictability for issue resolution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Monitoring for PROs
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

Report-URI operates on a tiered subscription model, while DMARC report viewer is a free, open-source solution that requires self-hosting.
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Report-URI or DMARC report viewer?
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions