What is the main difference between Report-URI and DMARC Monitor?

Report-URI offers more detailed, raw DMARC data and supports additional email security protocols like MTA-STS and BIMI. DMARC Monitor provides a simpler, more streamlined interface focused on core DMARC compliance, making it easier for less technical users to grasp.

Which tool is better for a small business just starting with DMARC?

For small businesses new to DMARC, DMARC Monitor might be a better starting point due to its focus on simplicity and ease of use. It offers clear, actionable insights without overwhelming you with extensive raw data.

Is there a free option available for these DMARC reporting tools?

Yes, both Report-URI and DMARC Monitor offer free options. Report-URI has a permanent free tier with core DMARC reporting features, while DMARC Monitor offers a "Free DMARC Report Plan".

Do either of these tools help with SPF flattening?

Report-URI offers a dedicated service for SPF flattening to help manage your SPF record and avoid the 10-lookup limit. DMARC Monitor does not explicitly advertise a similar service.

Report-URI vs DMARC Monitor

Choose Report-URI for extensive DMARC data analysis, or DMARC Monitor for a straightforward, focused approach.

5 / 5(1)

Compare to Suped

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Report-URI offers a comprehensive suite for DMARC reporting, providing deep insights into email authentication results. It excels in delivering raw DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, allowing for meticulous analysis of email traffic.

Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI supports monitoring for related protocols like MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. This makes it a powerful tool for organizations that require an all-encompassing view of their email security posture and are comfortable sifting through detailed data.

DMARC Monitor focuses primarily on providing clear, actionable DMARC reports. It aims to simplify the complex world of email authentication, offering an interface that quickly highlights authentication issues without overwhelming the user with raw data.

While it might not extend to the breadth of related protocols that Report-URI covers, DMARC Monitor is ideal for users who need straightforward DMARC compliance monitoring and a clear overview of their email senders without diving into the deepest technical details.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Report-URI's user experience is geared towards technical users and those who appreciate granular control and detailed data. The dashboard provides a wealth of information, from raw XML reports to aggregated summaries. Navigating through the extensive filtering options can initially feel complex.

Its strength lies in its ability to customize views and drill down into specific data points, making it a powerful analytics engine. However, this power can translate to a steeper learning curve for users new to DMARC or email authentication specifics.

DMARC Monitor generally offers a more streamlined and approachable user experience. The interface prioritizes clarity, presenting essential DMARC compliance data in an easy-to-digest format. This makes it a good option for those who want a quick understanding of their DMARC status.

While perhaps less customizable than Report-URI, DMARC Monitor focuses on providing direct answers to common DMARC questions, reducing the need for extensive technical knowledge to interpret reports. We found it easier to get started and understand the core issues at a glance.

Which product has the best support

Support

Report-URI primarily offers support through its online documentation and community forums. For paid plans, email support is available, providing more direct assistance. The self-service approach is effective for users who are comfortable with technical documentation and troubleshooting on their own.

However, for urgent or complex issues, relying solely on documentation might not be sufficient for all users. We found that the quality of support often correlates with the subscription tier.

DMARC Monitor, being part of a larger security firm (Logix InfoSecurity), typically offers more structured support channels, including direct email and potentially phone support, depending on the plan. This can be a significant advantage for organizations that prefer personalized assistance.

Their approach seems more hands-on, which is beneficial for users who may require guidance through the DMARC implementation process or need help interpreting their reports. This could lead to a more supportive experience, particularly for less technical teams.

Who should use each product

Suitability

Report-URI is exceptionally well-suited for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and enterprises that manage numerous domains and require a deep, technical understanding of their email ecosystems. Its comprehensive data and filtering capabilities make it a strong choice for advanced users.

For Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) with limited technical resources, Report-URI might present a steeper learning curve, but it offers robust functionality if they are willing to invest time in learning its intricacies. It is best for those who need precise control and extensive data access.

DMARC Monitor caters well to SMBs and organizations new to DMARC that seek a straightforward solution without the overwhelming complexity. It offers a clear, accessible overview of DMARC compliance, which is beneficial for teams with less specialized email security knowledge.

For enterprises, it may serve as a solid entry-level tool, but could lack the granular control or advanced reporting features that larger, more complex environments often demand. MSPs might find it useful for clients with simpler needs, but less so for clients requiring extensive analytics or multi-protocol monitoring.

How does Report-URI compare with DMARC Monitor?

DMARC report analysis

Analyzes aggregate and forensic DMARC reports.

Comprehensive, raw data access with powerful filtering.

Clear, simplified views with actionable summaries.

Source detection

Identifies legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.

Forward detection

Helps identify email forwarding scenarios.

Spoof detection

Identifies attempts at email impersonation.

Notifications and alerts

Configurable alerts for DMARC issues.

Detailed and customizable alerts.

Standard alerts for common issues.

Reporting

Provides various reporting formats and dashboards.

Extensive reports with export options.

Summary reports for quick insights.

API

Application Programming Interface for data integration.

Available for programmatic access to data.

Not publicly advertised for customer use.

Multi-tenancy

Supports managing multiple domains/clients from one account.

Features for managing numerous domains.

Less emphasis on multi-client management.

SPF flattening

A service to prevent SPF lookup limits.

Dedicated SPF flattening service offered.

Does not explicitly offer SPF flattening.

Hosted DMARC

Ability to host DMARC record configuration.

Primarily a reporting tool, not a DMARC policy host.

Often bundled with DMARC implementation services.

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

Includes BIMI reporting capabilities.

No explicit BIMI support mentioned.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Reporting for secure transport protocols.

Offers comprehensive reporting for both.

No explicit support for these protocols.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors blocklists (blacklists) and domain reputation.

Integrates some abuse reporting and reputation insights.

Primary focus is on DMARC authentication, not blocklists.

AI copilot

Artificial intelligence assistant for insights.

No AI copilot feature mentioned.

DNS monitoring

Monitors domain name system records.

Includes basic DNS record checks.

Less focus on broader DNS monitoring beyond DMARC.

Self hostable

Option to host the software on your own servers.

A cloud-based SaaS platform.

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free period of use or a permanent free plan.

Provides a robust free tier.

Offers a free DMARC report plan.

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Report-URI's primary drawback for some users is its complexity and potentially dated user interface, which can make it less intuitive for DMARC newcomers. DMARC Monitor, while simpler, may fall short on advanced features and granular data for larger, more demanding organizations. It also has a limited public review presence, making external validation challenging.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

5 / 5(1)

0 / 5(0)

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.