Report-URI provides an extensive suite of DMARC reporting features. We appreciate its detailed breakdown of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, offering deep insights into email traffic and potential spoofing attempts. It doesn't just show you data; it helps you understand it with clear categorizations.
Beyond DMARC, Report-URI supports a variety of other security reports including CSP, PKP, Expect-CT, and TLS-RPT, making it a comprehensive security monitoring platform. Its ability to handle various reporting types centralizes security insights for many organizations.
DMARC 25 focuses primarily on core DMARC reporting functionality. From our experience, it offers a straightforward approach to monitoring DMARC reports, allowing users to see authentication results and identify non-compliant email sources. It's designed for users who need clear, essential DMARC oversight.
While it may not offer the breadth of additional security reporting types found in more feature-rich platforms, DMARC 25 capably handles the fundamental requirements of DMARC implementation and monitoring. Its simplicity can be an advantage for specific user groups looking for a dedicated DMARC solution.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Navigating Report-URI's dashboard can feel like stepping into a command center. It's powerful and offers a wealth of data, but this can also mean a steeper learning curve for new users. The interface is highly functional, but sometimes prioritizing functionality over visual simplicity.
The extensive customization and filtering options are a double-edged sword, offering incredible control for experts but potentially overwhelming those new to DMARC. Once mastered, however, its depth allows for efficient and precise analysis.
DMARC 25 offers a more streamlined and perhaps less intimidating user experience. We found its interface to be relatively clean and focused, presenting key DMARC metrics without excessive clutter. This can make initial setup and daily checks quicker for many users.
The simplicity, however, means it might lack some of the advanced filtering or detailed data visualizations that power users crave. For those who value ease of use and a direct approach to DMARC monitoring, DMARC 25 delivers a user-friendly experience.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI provides support primarily through documentation, a knowledge base, and email. We've found their resources to be quite thorough for self-service, covering most common questions and advanced configurations. Direct support responsiveness typically depends on your service tier.
For technical DMARC issues or complex implementations, their team offers valuable assistance, though it can sometimes require detailed explanations due to the platform's depth. They cater to a global audience, so support communication is generally in English.
DMARC 25's support seems more centered around direct contact methods, including phone and web forms, with reception hours tailored to the Japanese timezone. This approach suggests a personalized touch, especially for customers within their primary market.
However, for users outside of Japan or those preferring extensive self-service documentation, the support options might feel less comprehensive. Language support could also be a factor for non-Japanese speaking users, potentially leading to communication challenges.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI shines for enterprise organizations and managed service providers (MSPs) who require granular control, multi-domain management, and integration with other security reporting. Its robust feature set and scalability make it suitable for complex email environments.
While SMBs can certainly use Report-URI, the initial setup and comprehensive dashboard might feel like overkill. However, for growth-oriented SMBs anticipating increasing email complexity or specific security needs, it offers powerful capabilities once accustomed to its interface.
DMARC 25 appears best suited for small to medium businesses (SMBs) or organizations that prioritize simplicity and a focused DMARC monitoring solution, especially those operating within the Japanese market given its local support structure. It's a good fit for users who need to implement DMARC without extensive advanced features.
For large enterprises or MSPs managing a vast array of domains or requiring deep integration with other security protocols, DMARC 25 may prove less comprehensive than other options. Its straightforward nature is its strength, catering to users who need core DMARC compliance without added complexity.
DMARC report analysis
Aggregated and forensic report parsing and visualization.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding patterns.
Advanced heuristics for robust detection.
Basic detection based on common patterns.
Spoof detection
Identifies emails attempting to spoof your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Receive alerts for DMARC policy changes or anomalies.
Reporting
Provides various reports and data exports.
Comprehensive and customizable reports.
Essential DMARC reports.
API
Programmatic access for integration with other systems.
Extensive API for data and management.
No public API available.
Multi-tenancy
Ability to manage multiple client domains or organizations.
Designed for MSPs and large organizations.
Not designed for multi-tenant management.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record limits.
Provides a robust SPF flattening solution.
No explicit SPF flattening feature.
Hosted DMARC
Offers DMARC record hosting and management.
Yes, for ease of management.
Primarily a reporting tool, not a DMARC hoster.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Integration and guidance for BIMI implementation.
No specific BIMI support mentioned.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Reporting for secure email transport mechanisms.
Comprehensive reporting for secure transport.
Focuses solely on DMARC.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of IP blocklists (blacklists) and sender reputation.
Offers some related reputation data.
No integrated blocklist monitoring.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC analysis and recommendations.
No AI copilot feature.
No AI copilot feature.
DNS monitoring
Monitors the health and configuration of DNS records.
Monitors relevant DMARC, SPF, DKIM DNS records.
Monitors DMARC DNS records.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own servers.
SaaS only.
SaaS only.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free option to try the service.
Offers a generous free tier.
Provides a one-month free trial.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI, while powerful, can initially be overwhelming due to its feature density. Its pricing structure can also scale quickly depending on the volume of reports, which might be a concern for high-volume senders. DMARC 25, conversely, has the drawback of a lack of transparent pricing and a potentially limited feature set for advanced users. Its support and focus appear to be heavily localized to Japan, which could present challenges for international users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Both Report-URI and DMARC 25 do not publicly list their specific pricing tiers, requiring direct contact for all detailed cost inquiries.
5 / 5(1)
