Report-URI focuses heavily on DMARC reporting and enforcement. It provides a granular view of your DMARC reports, allowing us to dive deep into individual sending sources and their authentication results. The platform excels at showing us exactly who is sending on our behalf and how well our DMARC policy is being applied, making it a strong tool for those who prioritize raw data and detailed insights.
Beyond core DMARC, Report-URI also supports other security standards like CSP (Content Security Policy) and HPKP (HTTP Public Key Pinning), though these are not directly related to email deliverability. For email, its strength lies in giving us the raw material to analyze, rather than extensive automated recommendations, which suits a more hands-on approach to DMARC management.
Agari Brand Protection, as part of a larger security suite, offers DMARC reporting as one component of its broader email security strategy. It aims to protect against advanced email attacks, including phishing and impersonation, by providing enforcement against unauthorized senders. This solution is geared towards organizations looking for a comprehensive defense against brand abuse.
While it provides the necessary DMARC insights to reach enforcement, its reporting interface can sometimes feel less detailed for pure DMARC analysis compared to a dedicated DMARC reporting tool. However, its integration with other Agari products for threat intelligence and incident response offers value for enterprise-level security operations, extending beyond just DMARC data.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Report-URI presents a more technical interface, which can be both a strength and a weakness. For DMARC experts and those comfortable with raw data, the dashboard offers detailed reports and filtering options that provide deep insights. We found it relatively straightforward to navigate once we understood the terminology and layout, allowing for quick identification of sending sources and policy compliance issues.
However, for users who are new to DMARC or prefer a more guided experience, the initial learning curve can be steeper. The platform emphasizes data presentation over interpretative guidance, meaning users need a good understanding of DMARC concepts to fully leverage its capabilities. It's a tool built for the technically proficient, offering power to those who know how to wield it.
Agari Brand Protection offers a more polished, enterprise-grade user interface. The dashboards are generally clean and designed to present key information at a glance, focusing on brand protection metrics and threat insights rather than just raw DMARC data. For a high-level overview of our DMARC status and potential brand impersonation attempts, it performs well.
While its broader scope is beneficial for security teams, the DMARC-specific reporting can sometimes feel less intuitive or harder to drill down into compared to dedicated DMARC tools. Navigating through its extensive feature set to find specific DMARC details might require some familiarity with the Agari ecosystem. It aims for a comprehensive security view, which occasionally trades DMARC granularity for broader protection.
Which product has the best support
Support
Report-URI provides support primarily through documentation, community forums, and email. For technical users, the extensive documentation is often sufficient to troubleshoot common issues and understand the platform's features. We found the email support to be responsive for specific queries, although it might not offer the immediate, hands-on guidance some users prefer.
Given its more DIY (do-it-yourself) nature, the support model aligns with its target audience of technically savvy individuals and smaller organizations. Users should be prepared to leverage self-service resources first, which for many, including us, is perfectly acceptable, especially for a tool that emphasizes direct access to data.
Agari Brand Protection, as an enterprise solution, typically offers more structured support channels, including dedicated account managers and technical support teams. Our experience suggests that larger organizations can expect a higher level of personalized assistance, which is crucial when integrating DMARC with complex enterprise security infrastructures.
The support can be quite effective for complex deployments and incident response, fitting the needs of its enterprise clientele. However, as noted in some user feedback, the responsiveness can sometimes be slower than desired for routine inquiries, which is a common challenge for large-scale enterprise support operations.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Report-URI is well-suited for technically proficient users, developers, and small to medium businesses (SMBs) that want direct access to their DMARC data without excessive abstraction. It's an excellent choice for organizations that manage their DMARC policies in-house and prefer a hands-on approach to monitoring and enforcement. Its focus on raw data makes it less ideal for those seeking an automated, interpretative service.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Report-URI can be a viable option if they have the technical expertise to manage multiple client domains and interpret the raw DMARC reports. It offers the flexibility and detail needed for granular control, but lacks specific multi-tenancy features or dashboards tailored for MSPs compared to some other solutions. Enterprise clients might find it too focused on raw data if they prefer a more integrated security platform.
Agari Brand Protection is designed for larger enterprises with complex security needs, particularly those looking for a comprehensive email security suite that includes DMARC enforcement. It's ideal for organizations that face sophisticated phishing and impersonation threats and require a robust platform with advanced threat intelligence and incident response capabilities. Its integration into a broader security ecosystem provides significant value for these use cases.
For SMBs, Agari Brand Protection is likely overkill and potentially too costly, as its feature set extends far beyond basic DMARC reporting. MSPs might find it useful for their enterprise clients, but it's not built with multi-tenancy as a primary focus. Its strength lies in providing a layered defense for large-scale operations, where DMARC is one critical piece of a much larger security puzzle.
How does Report-URI compare with Agari Brand Protection?
DMARC report analysis
Detailed analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
High level of detail and raw data access.
Integrated into a broader security view.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and fraudulent sending sources.
Manual source identification based on raw data.
Automated identification with threat intelligence.
Forward detection
Identifies email forwarding loops and issues.
Requires manual analysis of reports.
Integrated into threat analysis.
Spoof detection
Detects attempts to impersonate your domain.
Based on DMARC policy enforcement.
Advanced detection with broader threat intelligence.
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for DMARC policy changes or anomalies.
Configurable alerts for DMARC events.
Integrated into enterprise security alerts.
Reporting
Generation of DMARC compliance and security reports.
Focus on raw DMARC aggregate data.
Comprehensive reports with security context.
API
Application Programming Interface for programmatic access.
Available for data access and automation.
Part of broader security platform integrations.
Multi-tenancy
Manages multiple domains or client accounts from one interface.
Not designed for multi-tenancy, more for individual domain management.
Suitable for managing multiple domains within an enterprise.
SPF flattening
Reduces DNS lookup overhead for SPF records.
Not offered as a core feature.
Typically offered as part of comprehensive DMARC management.
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records externally.
Requires manual DMARC record management.
Can assist with DMARC record management.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Provides guidance and reporting for BIMI.
Integrates BIMI support within brand protection.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Includes reporting for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT.
Integrates these protocols for enhanced security.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors domain/IP reputation on email blocklists (or blacklists).
Focuses on DMARC, not blocklist (or blacklist) monitoring.
Integrated into broader threat intelligence and brand protection.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC management.
Does not feature an AI copilot.
Does not feature an AI copilot.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.
Limited to DMARC-related DNS checks.
Part of a broader security posture.
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC solution on-premises.
Cloud-based service.
Cloud-based service.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Offers a free tier for basic DMARC reporting.
No public free trial, enterprise-focused sales.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Report-URI's primary drawback is its technical nature, which can be overwhelming for DMARC newcomers. It focuses on presenting raw data rather than offering extensive automated insights or prescriptive guidance, potentially requiring more manual effort for analysis. Agari Brand Protection, on the other hand, can feel less granular for dedicated DMARC reporting, as its DMARC features are part of a broader, more complex email security suite. Its enterprise focus means it might be overkill or inaccessible for smaller organizations, and its support responsiveness can sometimes be an area for improvement.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
5 / 5(1)
4 / 5(1)
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.What do you dislike about Report URI?Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networksRecommendations to others considering Report URI:Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific systemWhat problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection?I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic.What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection?The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further.What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you?It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
5 / 5(1)
