Palisade aims to be a comprehensive DMARC solution, offering a wide array of features designed for deeper analysis and control. We found its DMARC report parsing to be meticulous, providing granular detail on email sources and authentication results. It excels in identifying legitimate senders versus potential threats, which is crucial for moving towards a DMARC enforcement policy.
Beyond core DMARC, Palisade integrates advanced capabilities such as SPF flattening, which is incredibly helpful for organizations with many email services hitting the 10-lookup limit. Its reporting is highly customizable, allowing us to drill down into specific data points and generate tailored views for different stakeholders, from technical teams to executive leadership.
Send-Shield focuses on providing a straightforward and user-friendly DMARC reporting experience. Its feature set covers the essentials well, making it easy for users to get started with DMARC monitoring without being overwhelmed by complexity. The platform effectively aggregates DMARC data, presenting it in an understandable format that highlights key authentication failures and legitimate traffic.
While Send-Shield provides fundamental DMARC reports, we observed that its advanced features are more limited compared to Palisade. It’s excellent for basic DMARC implementation and monitoring, helping organizations achieve p=none or p=quarantine policies with clear visibility. However, for those needing highly specialized tools like BIMI or extensive SPF optimization, it might require additional solutions.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Palisade offers a robust interface that, while powerful, can initially feel a bit dense. The dashboard presents a wealth of information, which is excellent for detailed analysis but might require a slight learning curve for new users or those less familiar with DMARC intricacies. Once we became accustomed to its layout, navigating through reports and settings was efficient.
Customization is a strong point for Palisade, allowing users to tailor views and alerts to their specific needs. However, the initial setup process, particularly for advanced configurations, can be more involved. We appreciate the depth it offers, but it's clearly designed for users who want extensive control and are comfortable with a more complex tool.
Send-Shield prides itself on its simplicity and ease of use, which we found to be a definite strength. The interface is clean, intuitive, and designed to guide users through the DMARC monitoring process with minimal friction. Setting up a domain and reviewing initial reports is very straightforward, making it an excellent choice for those new to DMARC.
The dashboard provides clear, actionable insights without overwhelming the user with too much data. While it may not offer the same depth of customization as Palisade, its focus on essential information and an uncluttered design makes daily monitoring quick and efficient. For users who prioritize a seamless and uncomplicated experience, Send-Shield delivers effectively.
Which product has the best support
Support
Our experience with Palisade's support was generally positive. They offer various channels, including email and often dedicated account managers for larger plans. When facing complex DMARC implementation questions or needing assistance with advanced configurations, their team demonstrated a solid understanding of the protocol and the product.
Response times were reasonable, and the support staff provided thorough explanations. While not always instant, the quality of assistance helped us navigate intricate DMARC challenges effectively. They cater well to users who might have in-depth technical queries.
Send-Shield provides reliable support, particularly for common DMARC setup and monitoring questions. Their email support is responsive, and we found their team helpful in resolving typical issues. For users who are looking for clear guidance on basic DMARC principles, Send-Shield's support is perfectly adequate.
Their support structure appears to be well-suited for smaller to medium-sized businesses that might not have a dedicated email security expert. While more advanced or niche DMARC issues might require more back-and-forth, their accessible approach ensures users can generally get the help they need to maintain their DMARC posture.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Palisade is an excellent fit for enterprise organizations and MSPs managing multiple clients with complex email ecosystems. Its comprehensive feature set, deep analytics, and customizable reporting are invaluable for large-scale deployments and for achieving stringent DMARC enforcement policies. SMBs might find it overly feature-rich and potentially more expensive than needed, although it offers significant long-term value for growth.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities and detailed insights allow for efficient management of diverse client domains. Enterprises will benefit from its advanced threat detection, API access for integration, and robust reporting for compliance and security auditing. It's a tool for those who demand extensive control and deep dives into their email authentication data.
Send-Shield is ideally suited for SMBs and organizations that are new to DMARC or prefer a simpler, more affordable solution to get their DMARC journey started. Its ease of use and clear reporting make it accessible without requiring extensive email security expertise. Larger enterprises might find its feature set less comprehensive for their complex needs, but it serves as a solid foundation.
For MSPs managing clients with straightforward DMARC requirements, Send-Shield can be a good option for efficient, basic monitoring. However, for clients with advanced needs, a more feature-rich tool might be necessary. It strikes a good balance between functionality and simplicity for businesses focused on establishing and maintaining a basic DMARC policy.
How does Palisade compare with Send-Shield?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifying legitimate and illegitimate sending sources.
Advanced source identification with deep drill-down.
Clear overview of sending sources.
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding impacting DMARC results.
Sophisticated forwarding analysis.
Basic forwarding insights.
Spoof detection
Identifying and alerting on email spoofing attempts.
Proactive and detailed spoofing alerts.
Reliable spoofing identification.
Notifications and alerts
Configurable alerts for DMARC policy changes or threats.
Highly customizable alert settings.
Essential alerts for policy changes.
Reporting
Generating comprehensive reports on DMARC compliance and email traffic.
Extensive, customizable reporting.
Basic to analytical reports.
API
Application Programming Interface for integration with other systems.
Robust API for data access and automation.
Likely basic API for core data.
Multi-tenancy
Managing multiple client or subdomain accounts from a single interface.
Designed for complex multi-domain management.
Supports multiple domains per account.
SPF flattening
Optimizing SPF records to avoid the 10-lookup limit.
Automatic SPF record optimization.
Hosted DMARC
Managing DMARC records on behalf of the user.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Comprehensive BIMI setup and monitoring.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Integrated MTA-STS and TLS-RPT capabilities.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring email sending IP and domain reputation on blacklists (blocklists).
Advanced reputation monitoring across multiple blacklists.
AI copilot
Artificial intelligence assistance for DMARC policy recommendations.
AI-driven insights and recommendations.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.
Holistic DNS record surveillance.
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on private infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial period or a permanently free service tier.
Contact for trial details.
Offers a free trial period.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Palisade, while powerful, can have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set, potentially overwhelming new users. Send-Shield, on the other hand, might lack some of the advanced functionalities that larger organizations or MSPs might require for complex email environments, limiting its scalability for highly specialized needs.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Send-Shield offers transparent tiered pricing based on email volume, billed annually, while Palisade requires direct contact for pricing details.