Suped

OnDMARC vs Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense

Choose OnDMARC for a broad feature set, Proofpoint for deep integration.
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoCompare to Suped
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC management tools. We found its Dynamic Services particularly robust, allowing for seamless management of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI. The platform excels at simplifying SPF record flattening, essential for bypassing the 10-lookup limit and ensuring deliverability for complex sending infrastructures. Its Investigate tool offers instant deliverability diagnostics, which is a significant time-saver.
The Radar Pro feature, combined with DNS Guardian and Global IP Lookup, extends beyond basic DMARC monitoring to offer proactive threat intelligence and DNS health checks. Forensic reporting provides granular detail, helping us understand authentication failures and identify potential spoofing attempts. We appreciate the API access and smart alerts for integrating with existing security workflows and staying informed of anomalies.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense (EFD) focuses on end-to-end email fraud protection, building upon DMARC to secure the entire email ecosystem. Its core strength lies in streamlining DMARC deployment with dedicated consultants and guided workflows, making the transition to enforcement smoother for large organizations. The platform provides extensive visibility into legitimate senders and potential threats.
Beyond DMARC, EFD offers robust organization reputation protection, actively identifying and preventing domain and lookalike domain spoofing. The Supplier Risk Explorer is a standout, offering insights into third-party risks and impostor threats. Its hosted authentication services, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, simplify record management, ensuring compliance and high reliability across geographically distributed data centers.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, OnDMARC offers an intuitive and clean user interface. The guided workflows make setting up and maintaining DMARC records straightforward, even for those less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication. We particularly value the single pane of glass view, which consolidates DMARC, SPF, and DKIM monitoring across multiple domains, simplifying oversight for IT administrators.
While the dashboard provides a clear overview, some users, including ourselves initially, might find certain reporting dashboards could benefit from more customization options or a less overwhelming volume of daily reports without filtering. However, the overall ease of navigation and clear visual reporting helps in quickly identifying misconfigured senders or potential threats.
Proofpoint EFD provides a professional interface that, while powerful, can initially feel less intuitive for new users. Its emphasis on guided workflows and consultant-led deployment suggests a more hands-on setup, which might be a barrier for those seeking a purely self-service platform. We find its integration with the broader Proofpoint ecosystem is a strength, but can add complexity if EFD is a standalone deployment.
The product excels at automating the detection and sorting of fraudulent emails, which is a direct benefit for end-users, reducing their exposure to phishing. However, some users have reported delays in releasing legitimate emails caught by the filters, indicating that while effective, the filtering can be aggressive and require manual intervention, affecting the immediate user experience.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC's support truly stands out. We consistently experienced responsive and knowledgeable assistance, from initial setup to ongoing management. The availability of email support, quarterly or annual account reviews, and dedicated account managers (depending on the plan) provides a strong safety net for DMARC implementation and optimization. Their team is proactive, offering suggestions and keeping clients updated.
The company's commitment to continuous improvement, evidenced by their willingness to take on feature improvements and provide in-application guidance, contributes significantly to a positive support experience. While chat support is not available in all tiers, the quality of their technical and account management support is a definite advantage, making complex DMARC journeys much smoother.
Proofpoint EFD offers dedicated consultants for DMARC deployment, which is a major advantage for complex enterprise environments. This structured approach ensures expert guidance through the entire process, identifying legitimate senders and helping to implement DMARC policies effectively. Their support for hosted authentication services also simplifies ongoing management.
However, based on user feedback, we've noted some inconsistencies in support responsiveness, with reports of needing multiple follow-ups for replies. While the professional team driving the DMARC implementation is a positive, finding available time on their schedule can sometimes be a challenge. This suggests that while expert help is available, it might require persistence to secure timely assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
OnDMARC is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses (SMBs) to large enterprises, seeking comprehensive DMARC management without needing extensive internal expertise. Its tiered pricing, including an Express plan, makes it accessible for SMBs, while the advanced features in Essentials and Premier cater to the complex needs of larger organizations. For managed service providers (MSPs), the platform's multi-domain management capabilities and user permissioning (in higher tiers) are valuable.
We find it particularly beneficial for companies prioritizing a clear, guided path to DMARC enforcement and those needing robust SPF flattening, BIMI, and MTA-STS support. Its user-friendly interface and strong support structure make it an excellent choice for teams looking to take control of their email authentication without significant friction, making it a good fit for most business needs.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense is primarily designed for enterprise-level organizations with complex email infrastructures and a strong existing relationship with Proofpoint's security ecosystem. Its consultant-led DMARC deployment and deep integration with email gateways are tailored for environments that require hands-on, expert-driven implementation and comprehensive fraud protection. While effective, its robust nature might be overkill for smaller businesses and SMBs.
For MSPs and large enterprises, EFD's focus on supplier risk visibility, lookalike domain detection, and a virtual takedown service offers a holistic approach to email security that extends beyond basic DMARC. It's best suited for organizations that prioritize a highly managed service for email fraud defense and are looking for a solution that provides deep insights into the broader threat landscape impacting their brand and supply chain.

How does OnDMARC compare with Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

OnDMARC generally receives high praise for its ease of use and support, though some users note that forensic reports could benefit from auto-triage and the GUI can sometimes be clunky. Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, while robust, faces criticism for being overly aggressive in its filtering, occasionally flagging legitimate emails and causing delays in delivery, with some users also finding the UI less intuitive and support response times inconsistent.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Great for Managing Multiple DMAC Traces, Needs Auto-Triage for Forensic Reports
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?Managing multiple DMARC traces has become much simpler. By enabling BIMI, we were able to significantly reduce our key risks with both customers and partners.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?There is a need for automatic triaging of forensic reports, along with notifications if any anomalies are detected.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?BIMI helps our customers and partners recognize phishing scams more easily.
Verified User in Retail
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Overkill
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?Great filters for junk and spam. Easy widgets in email notifications to release legit email that is not spamWhat do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?Too much filtering. At times, overkill. Filters out legitimate emails.What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?Protect network from illicit email spoofing. Employees that are non tech savvy that click on fishing emails.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Dynamic SPF and Powerful Features, GUI Could Use Improvement
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?I have been using Red Sift OnDMARC for over three years for monitoring DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across multiple domains, which would be difficult to manage without such a tool. It offers the ease of dynamic SPF and dynamic DMARC, which simplify complex monitoring tasks. The software provides a powerful set of features, making any initial setup challenges worthwhile. I especially value the single pane of glass interface as an IT administrator managing domains that engineers use, allowing me to track domain usage, detect spam issues, and dynamically update DMARC, DKIM, and SPF with ease. The dynamic SPF and DMARC/DKIM reports are integral for my operations, as they save considerable time by turning potentially lengthy tasks into several-minute jobs. Furthermore, the friendliness and support from our account manager, alongside our quarterly meetings, enhance the overall experience and decision to continue using the platform.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?I find the GUI a little bit difficult to navigate sometimes and a bit clunky, which sometimes makes it hard to find what I want.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?I use the product to monitor DMARC, SPF, and DKIM across domains, simplifying updates and detecting spam issues with ease. It turns lengthy tasks into minutes, providing a comprehensive view of domain usage and security.
Brice P.
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Not sure if it's worth the hassle
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?I do like that it auto scans my emails and sorts out the scam/fraudulent ones.What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?I greatly dislike having to wait for the flagged emails, that are actually not fraudulent, but something that I am looking for. It does not send me the alert until the next day, and then once its been released and approved, it ends up taking another 10 minutes or so (Max) to get to me.What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?I am getting significantly fewer fraudulent/scam emails
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Easy DMARC implementation with great visibility
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?OnDMARC makes it very easy to set up and maintain DMARC records. The guided workflows and clear reporting helped us move from monitoring to full enforcement confidently. The user interface is intuitive, and support is very responsive whenever we have questions.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?It would be helpful if some of the reporting dashboards allowed more customization or export options. Sometimes, the volume of daily reports can feel overwhelming without filtering.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?It is helping us prevent domain spoofing and phishing attacks by enforcing DMARC policies. It has also improved visibility into who is sending emails on behalf of our domain, so we can take quick action if needed. Overall, it has strengthened our email security posture and improved trust in our communications.
Shashi K.
SR Manager IT Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Email Protection by Proofpoint Fraud Defence
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?This product provides email protection for both Inbound and outbound emails from all the domains which help in securing the mailboxes. This adds the advantage of the analytics features alike continuously shows the volume of mails as phishing /secures messages.What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?Like other proofpoint products this also has implementing and configuring problems as they are not easy to configure in the organization environment.Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:This product offers you great security over emails and customers can leverage the support and different product portfolio they offer.What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?We are securing our emails from phising mails /messages for all the domains and for both inbound outbound messages.
Anjali V.
Cyber Security Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
It is quite a useful tool to manage SPF/DKIM/DMARC records and understand it's impact on the domain.
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?The ease of using the application and the UI that is provides that helps in managing the records of the domain. Plus the customer service for the tool is quite responsive.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?The limitation of the feature of MTA-STS, in which it reports only a few of the domains.What problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?It helps us in getting a clearer picture of the use case of our domain, plus the acceptance and the rejection rate.
Ashman B.
CyberSecurity Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Reliable tool for spam emails!
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?It's a great reliable tool and keep your inbox more secure and spam free. As a security measure this is great tool which prevents from any fraudulent emails and send alerts as necessary. I am currently using at my company and find all the spam emails being avoided. We usually receives too many on our generic email alias and this help in securing.What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?It's a great tool, though I find the use of it a very little. Only being capable of avoiding spam emails. Also the dashboard is not much interactiveRecommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:It was always better to have precaution than being penalized by unwanted threat. It's always good to be more secure and spam free and take preventive steps towards running your business securely.What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?We consider our emails to be safe and spam free. And probably easy to set up
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Easy DMARC setup
What do you like best about Red Sift OnDMARC?We have had OnDMARC for several years, we onboarded all of our managed domains over the past 12months. It was very easy adding SPF, DKIM records and moving DMARC to 100% Reject. We had support from Red Sift all the way.What do you dislike about Red Sift OnDMARC?Sometimes the dashboard is misleading, i had moved a domain to reject 50% and the dashboard didn't reflect that. but customer support fixed that very quicklyWhat problems is Red Sift OnDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?Securing our domains to bring them up to 100% Reject
Verified User in Law Practice
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
We use it as our Email Proxy.
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?Ability to filter by most likely spam emails. We also have the ability to open up domains.What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?The UI can be a bit more intuitive if it was up to me.Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense:I would recommend for the ease of use and security features offered.What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you?Fraud emails and Spam emails for our Enterprise account.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

OnDMARC offers clear tiered pricing, including an Express plan for smaller volumes, while Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense requires direct contact for all pricing inquiries.
Logo
Logo
Small
$9-12 / month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$9-12 / month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Large
$9-12 / month (Express)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with OnDMARC or Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    OnDMARC vs Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped