Suped

MailHardener vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose MailHardener for comprehensive email security, DMARCAnalyzer for straightforward DMARC monitoring.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MailHardener offers a robust suite of tools that extends beyond basic DMARC reporting. We found its focus on broader email security protocols, such as SPF flattening and MTA-STS deployment, to be particularly strong. This comprehensive approach means it's not just about DMARC, but about securing the entire email flow.
The platform provides granular control over various aspects of email authentication, giving us a deep dive into our email ecosystem. For organizations with complex sending infrastructures or a strong desire for end-to-end email security, MailHardener delivers the tools needed to manage and enforce policies effectively.
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, excels at providing clear and concise DMARC reporting. Its core strength lies in making DMARC adoption and ongoing monitoring straightforward. We appreciated its ability to quickly identify sending sources and present DMARC compliance data in an accessible format, which is great for getting started.
While it focuses primarily on DMARC, it integrates well into the broader Mimecast ecosystem for those already using their services. The emphasis is on actionable DMARC insights, helping users move quickly towards DMARC enforcement without getting bogged down in overly complex configurations outside the DMARC realm.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MailHardener's user interface is highly functional and provides access to a wealth of data and configuration options. However, we found that its depth of features can lead to a slightly steeper learning curve, especially for those new to advanced email security concepts.
Once you are familiar with the platform, its power becomes evident. It's designed for users who appreciate detailed control and are willing to invest time in understanding its capabilities. While not always the prettiest, it gets the job done for those needing robust management.
DMARCAnalyzer offers a very intuitive and clean user experience. The dashboards are well-designed, making it easy to quickly grasp DMARC compliance, identify threats, and see sending source trends. Its simplified approach makes it highly accessible for both DMARC novices and experienced professionals.
The setup process is streamlined, focusing on guiding users through the necessary steps to implement DMARC. We found it easy to navigate, with clear visual cues and straightforward reports that prioritize readability and actionable insights, reducing potential confusion.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found MailHardener's support team to be responsive and highly knowledgeable, particularly regarding the more intricate aspects of email security and DMARC implementation. Their expertise covers not just their product, but the underlying protocols, which is a significant advantage.
They offer timely assistance and are capable of guiding users through complex configurations or troubleshooting scenarios. For those encountering unique email infrastructure challenges, having access to such a skilled support team is invaluable.
DMARCAnalyzer, backed by Mimecast, provides a generally reliable and professional support experience. As part of a larger organization, their support structure is well-defined, offering standard channels for assistance.
While their support is competent, it sometimes feels a bit more structured or corporate compared to a dedicated, niche provider. However, for common DMARC issues and platform navigation, users can expect efficient and clear guidance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MailHardener is an excellent choice for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) due to its strong multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive suite of email security features, allowing them to manage multiple client domains effectively. It's also highly suitable for enterprise organizations that require deep control and a broad approach to email authentication, including protocols beyond DMARC.
For Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) with a dedicated IT team or a good understanding of email security, MailHardener provides powerful tools to enforce policies and protect their brand. It might be a bit much for absolute beginners, but for those seeking robust security, it's a solid contender.
DMARCAnalyzer is particularly well-suited for enterprise organizations already integrated into the Mimecast ecosystem, as it offers seamless compatibility. It provides a straightforward path for SMBs to adopt and monitor DMARC without overwhelming complexity, making it a strong option for businesses prioritizing ease of use.
While MSPs can certainly use DMARCAnalyzer, they might find MailHardener's broader email security features and multi-tenancy capabilities more aligned with managing diverse client needs for comprehensive protection. DMARCAnalyzer excels for those who want a focused, user-friendly DMARC solution.

How does MailHardener compare with DMARCAnalyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both MailHardener and DMARCAnalyzer are capable DMARC solutions, but each has areas where it could improve. MailHardener, while feature-rich, can feel a bit overwhelming initially due to its comprehensive nature, and its UI sometimes lacks the polished feel of some competitors. DMARCAnalyzer, on the other hand, is excellent for DMARC but less comprehensive when it comes to related email security protocols like MTA-STS or advanced DNS monitoring outside of DMARC records, which might be a drawback for those seeking an all-in-one solution. Its reliance on 'contact for pricing' can also be a hurdle for some users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

MailHardener offers a transparent free tier and clear pricing structure, whereas DMARCAnalyzer primarily operates on a free trial followed by a 'contact for pricing' model.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free plan available
Free trial, then contact for pricing
Medium
Paid plans available
Contact for pricing
Large
Paid plans available
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing, MSP plans
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with MailHardener or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions