Which product is better for DMARC beginners?

Mail Tower generally offers a more intuitive and visually guided experience, making it easier for users new to DMARC to understand their email security posture and take action. Report-URI's strength lies in raw data access, which is better suited for experienced users.

Does Report-URI offer more than just DMARC reporting?

Yes, Report-URI is a broader security reporting platform, supporting various policies like Content Security Policy (CSP), Certificate Transparency, and TLS-RPT, in addition to DMARC. This makes it a comprehensive tool for a wider range of security monitoring needs.

Can I manage multiple client domains with these tools?

Mail Tower features built-in multi-tenancy, making it highly suitable for MSPs managing several client domains. Report-URI does not have explicit multi-tenancy features, but technically proficient users could leverage its API to create custom solutions for managing multiple domains.

Which product is better for identifying email spoofing?

Both products can help identify email spoofing by analyzing DMARC reports. Mail Tower provides clear alerts and visual summaries for detected spoofing attempts. Report-URI offers detailed data that allows for in-depth analysis of DMARC pass/fail results to pinpoint spoofing sources.

Do these tools help with SPF flattening?

Mail Tower includes SPF flattening capabilities, which helps in managing and reducing the number of DNS lookups required for your SPF record, preventing the 'too many lookups' error. Report-URI does not offer SPF flattening as a feature.

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Mail Tower offers a robust set of features focused on DMARC compliance and email security. It provides detailed DMARC reports, helping us identify legitimate senders and detect unauthorized email activity efficiently. The platform aims to simplify complex DMARC data into actionable insights.

We found Mail Tower's source detection capabilities to be quite effective, automatically categorizing sending sources. While it covers core DMARC needs comprehensively, it currently lacks more advanced features like MTA-STS reporting or built-in blocklist checks, which might be a consideration for highly complex environments.

Report-URI is known for its granular data access and its focus on broader security reporting, including Content Security Policy (CSP) and Certificate Transparency alongside DMARC. When it comes to DMARC, it provides raw, unfiltered data that allows for deep analysis, which is invaluable for security researchers and technically proficient users.

The tool's strength lies in its API access and webhooks, enabling integration into existing security workflows. However, for a user primarily focused on visual DMARC reporting and automated insights, the raw data approach might require more effort to interpret compared to platforms that offer more visual summaries out-of-the-box. We appreciate the level of detail but acknowledge it comes with a steeper learning curve for DMARC beginners.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Mail Tower provides a user-friendly interface that prioritizes clarity and ease of navigation. We found the dashboard intuitive, presenting DMARC compliance rates and threat detection summaries at a glance. Setting up new domains and configuring alerts is straightforward, minimizing the time needed for initial deployment.

The visualizations are well-designed, making it easy to understand the health of our email sending. It feels purpose-built for DMARC, ensuring that users can quickly find the information they need without being overwhelmed by unrelated features. This makes it a good fit for those who want clear, concise DMARC management.

Report-URI's user experience caters to a more technical audience. While functional, its interface is less visually driven for DMARC reporting compared to Mail Tower. It excels at presenting the raw data, allowing users to query and filter reports extensively.

The strength here is in customization and integration, but this comes at the cost of immediate visual simplicity. Users looking for quick, high-level overviews might find themselves digging through more data. We appreciate the power it offers, but acknowledge it requires a certain comfort level with data analysis and API usage to extract its full value.

Which product has the best support

Support

When interacting with Mail Tower's support, we experienced responsive and helpful assistance. Their team demonstrated a good understanding of DMARC complexities and provided clear solutions to our queries. Support channels typically include email and an online knowledge base, which we found to be well-maintained.

The personal touch in their support interactions suggests a focus on customer satisfaction. While not offering 24/7 phone support, the quality of their asynchronous communication was consistently high, effectively guiding us through setup and any troubleshooting needs.

Report-URI's support often leverages its extensive documentation and community resources. For more direct assistance, we typically utilized email or ticket-based support. Given its technically oriented user base, the support often assumes a level of expertise, providing detailed technical guidance.

We found the team to be knowledgeable, especially concerning the intricacies of various security policies. While their response times are generally reasonable, the depth of technical explanation might be overwhelming for less experienced users. It's a support system built for problem-solving with a technical lens.

Who should use each product

Suitability

Mail Tower is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and enterprises seeking a straightforward, visual DMARC reporting solution. Its intuitive interface and actionable insights make it accessible for teams without deep email security expertise.

For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Mail Tower offers multi-tenancy capabilities, enabling efficient management of multiple client domains from a single dashboard. This makes it a strong contender for those needing to scale DMARC services across their client portfolio without added complexity.

Report-URI shines for technically adept users, security professionals, and larger enterprises that require granular control and extensive integration capabilities. Its API-first approach and detailed data access are ideal for organizations with custom security stacks and in-house expertise.

While it doesn't explicitly cater to MSPs with dedicated multi-tenancy features in the same way, technically proficient MSPs might leverage its API to build their own client management solutions. It's less suited for SMBs looking for a quick, visual overview, but powerful for those who want to dive deep into security data, including DMARC, CSP, and TLS-RPT.

How does Mail Tower compare with Report-URI?

DMARC report analysis

Interpreting aggregated and forensic DMARC reports.

Visual, actionable insights

Raw data, deep querying

Source detection

Identifying legitimate email sending services.

Automatic identification

Manual review often required

Forward detection

Recognizing legitimate email forwarding.

Identifies email redirects

With custom parsing

Spoof detection

Identifying unauthorized email impersonation.

Clear alerts for spoofing

Relies on DMARC pass/fail

Notifications and alerts

Real-time alerts for DMARC events.

Customisable triggers

Email, webhooks

Reporting

Generating DMARC compliance and threat reports.

Visual, scheduled reports

Granular, API-driven

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data.

Comprehensive API

Multi-tenancy

Managing multiple client accounts.

Built-in for MSPs

Not designed for this

SPF flattening

Reducing SPF record lookup limits.

Helps manage SPF limits

Hosted DMARC

Providing DMARC record hosting.

Reports, not hosts

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Reporting for secure transport protocols.

TLS-RPT supported

Blocklists and reputation

Monitoring domain reputation on blacklists.

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance for DMARC management.

DNS monitoring

Monitoring DNS records for changes.

Self hostable

Ability to host the software on-premise.

Cloud-based

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free option.

Limited duration trial

Generous free plan

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Mail Tower, while strong in core DMARC, currently lacks deeper security integrations and advanced protocols like MTA-STS reporting. Report-URI's primary drawback for many is its less intuitive user interface for DMARC, often requiring a more technical approach to extract insights, which can be a hurdle for less experienced users.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

5 / 5(1)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Monitoring for PROs

5.0 / 5

What do you like best about Report URI? What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great. What do you dislike about Report URI? Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks Recommendations to others considering Report URI: Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you? It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.

Vasilis Filippos S.

Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

Mail Tower offers clear tiered pricing based on email volume, whereas Report-URI's pricing details are not publicly available and require direct contact.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Contact for pricing

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Enterprise

Over 1 million emails / month

Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Mail Tower or Report-URI?

Try Suped

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services

DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix

Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly

Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail

Get started - free

Suped

Mail Tower vs Report-URI

Feature set

User experience

Support

Suitability

How does Mail Tower compare with Report-URI?

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

What makes Suped different

Frequently asked questions

Suped