Suped

Mail Tower vs MailHardener

Choose Mail Tower for focused DMARC analysis, choose MailHardener for comprehensive email security.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower primarily focuses on DMARC reporting and analysis, providing a clear interface for understanding your email authentication. Its strength lies in presenting DMARC data in an easily digestible format, helping users quickly identify authentication issues for SPF and DKIM.
We found that Mail Tower excels in offering intuitive visualizations of DMARC aggregate reports, making it straightforward to pinpoint where emails are failing or passing authentication. It's built for those who need dedicated DMARC monitoring without the complexity of a broader email security suite.
MailHardener offers a more extensive suite of email security features beyond just DMARC. In addition to DMARC reporting, it integrates SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI, providing a holistic approach to email authentication and security protocols.
We've observed that MailHardener provides granular control and detailed insights across all these protocols, allowing for a comprehensive hardening of your email infrastructure. It includes tools like SPF flattening and hosted DMARC, which are beneficial for complex setups and larger organizations aiming for full compliance.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower boasts a user-friendly interface that prioritizes simplicity and clarity. We found it easy to navigate, with dashboards that immediately present key DMARC metrics without overwhelming the user. Setting up DMARC records and getting the first reports flowing is a smooth process.
The guided setup and straightforward reporting make Mail Tower an excellent choice for users who might be new to DMARC or prefer a less cluttered platform. It effectively distills complex email authentication data into actionable insights, requiring minimal technical expertise to get started.
MailHardener, with its broader feature set, naturally has a more feature-rich interface that can take a little more time to master. While powerful, the sheer number of options and settings means there's a steeper learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with various email security protocols beyond DMARC.
Once accustomed to its layout, we found MailHardener's dashboard to be highly functional, offering deep dives into each security aspect. It caters well to experienced users and IT professionals who appreciate comprehensive tools and granular control over their email infrastructure, even if it requires a bit more initial effort.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower provides responsive support, often through email and a knowledge base. We found their team to be helpful in addressing DMARC-specific queries and guiding us through the platform's features. Their documentation is clear and focused on their core offerings.
For questions related to DMARC reporting and setup, their support channels are generally effective. While they might not offer the same breadth of technical guidance as a more comprehensive platform, their specialized focus allows for efficient resolution of DMARC-related issues.
MailHardener offers comprehensive support, fitting its broader suite of tools. They provide extensive documentation, often including detailed articles on various email security protocols. Support channels typically include email and sometimes direct chat options.
We've experienced their support to be highly knowledgeable across all the protocols they cover, from DMARC to MTA-STS. They are well-equipped to assist with complex technical configurations and provide in-depth advice, which is crucial given the advanced features of their platform.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that primarily need to implement and monitor DMARC. Its ease of use makes it accessible for teams with limited email security expertise, allowing them to quickly achieve DMARC compliance.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) focusing on basic DMARC deployment for their clients, Mail Tower could serve as a straightforward tool, though it might lack some advanced multi-tenancy features. Enterprise-level organizations might find it too narrow if they require a full suite of email authentication protocols.
MailHardener is ideal for medium to large enterprises, as well as MSPs who manage complex email infrastructures for multiple clients. Its extensive feature set, including SPF flattening, hosted DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS, provides a robust solution for advanced email security needs.
MSPs will particularly benefit from its multi-tenancy capabilities, allowing them to manage numerous client domains efficiently. While SMBs could use it, the full power of MailHardener is best utilized by organizations that require comprehensive control and sophisticated protection against a wide array of email-based threats, including spam and phishing (blocklist monitoring).

How does Mail Tower compare with MailHardener?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Mail Tower, while excellent for focused DMARC reporting, can feel limited if your organization needs a broader email security solution that includes protocols like BIMI, MTA-STS, or blocklist monitoring. Its primary drawback is its narrower scope. MailHardener, on the other hand, can be perceived as having a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set. For users who only need DMARC, the comprehensive dashboard might feel overwhelming, and its pricing for smaller organizations might be less competitive if they don't utilize all the advanced features.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

MailHardener offers a free tier and scales with comprehensive features, while Mail Tower primarily offers tiered paid plans focused on DMARC.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free tier available
Medium
Contact for pricing
Standard Plan
Large
Contact for pricing
Large Plan
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Mail Tower or MailHardener?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Mail Tower vs MailHardener DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped