LetsDMARC, a component of Libraesva's broader email security suite, offers a robust set of features. We found its DMARC report analysis to be highly detailed, providing granular insights into email authentication results, including SPF and DKIM validation.
It excels in source and forward detection, helping identify legitimate senders and potential spoofing attempts. The platform is designed to handle complex enterprise environments, which is evident in its advanced reporting capabilities and the likelihood of API access for integration.
DMARC 25 provides a straightforward DMARC reporting service. Our experience indicates it covers the essential functionalities for DMARC implementation, such as aggregating and analyzing DMARC reports to show authentication trends and potential issues.
While it effectively pinpoints direct spoofing and failed authentication, it may not offer the same depth of advanced features like extensive DNS monitoring or multi-tenancy that larger, more enterprise-focused solutions typically provide. Its primary strength lies in its core DMARC functionality.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
LetsDMARC presents a professional and comprehensive dashboard. We found the setup process to be surprisingly simple and fast, considering the depth of its features. The clarity of instructions for various steps in DMARC implementation is a significant plus.
However, we did observe some minor graphical inconsistencies where certain settings were not retained when navigating between pages. This doesn't impede core functionality but can be a minor annoyance for power users making frequent configuration changes.
DMARC 25 offers a clean and intuitive interface, focusing on ease of use, especially for those new to DMARC. Its design prioritizes straightforward access to DMARC reports and basic analytics, making it easy to understand email authentication status at a glance.
While its simplicity is appealing, users looking for highly customizable dashboards or deeply integrated analytics might find it less comprehensive. The localization for the Japanese market, including contact information and language, indicates a tailored experience for that region, which could be a factor for international users.
Which product has the best support
Support
LetsDMARC, backed by Libraesva, boasts customer support that we found to be top-tier. Their support team is responsive and knowledgeable, effectively assisting with both setup and ongoing DMARC management.
The integration into a larger security product ecosystem likely means that support resources are robust and well-versed in complex email security scenarios. This level of assistance is crucial for enterprises navigating DMARC enforcement.
DMARC 25 offers support primarily through phone and web contact forms, with specific reception hours for phone inquiries. This direct contact approach ensures personalized assistance, which can be beneficial.
However, the support hours and the emphasis on Japanese contact details suggest that their primary support focus might be on the Japanese market. International users outside of these hours or regions might experience different response times compared to global platforms.
Who should use each product
Suitability
LetsDMARC is highly suitable for large enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) that require a comprehensive DMARC solution integrated within a broader email security framework. Its advanced features, detailed reporting, and potential for multi-tenancy make it ideal for managing multiple domains or client accounts.
For small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) with less complex needs, LetsDMARC might offer more functionality than strictly necessary, but its ease of setup means it can still be a strong contender if growth or future advanced requirements are anticipated.
DMARC 25 is best suited for SMBs, especially those within the Japanese market, seeking a simple and focused DMARC reporting tool. Its user-friendly interface and explicit free trial make it accessible for organizations beginning their DMARC journey without extensive technical expertise.
For enterprise-level organizations or MSPs managing a large number of diverse clients, the more limited feature set and potentially localized support might require additional tools or processes. However, for core DMARC monitoring, it performs admirably for smaller operations.
How does LetsDMARC compare with DMARC 25?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregates and analyzes DMARC reports from mailbox providers.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate sending sources for your domain.
Forward detection
Helps distinguish forwarded emails from spoofed ones.
Spoof detection
Identifies unauthorized emails attempting to impersonate your domain.
Notifications and alerts
Provides alerts for DMARC policy changes or critical events.
Reporting
Offers customizable reports on DMARC compliance and email traffic.
API
Allows programmatic access for integration with other systems.
Multi-tenancy
Enables management of multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.
SPF flattening
Helps overcome the 10-lookup SPF limit.
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records and policy enforcement.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors sender IP addresses against common blacklists (or blocklists).
AI copilot
AI-powered assistant for DMARC policy suggestions and analysis.
DNS monitoring
Monitors changes and health of critical DNS records.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Available via 'On Premise' deployment
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Contact for pricing
One month free trial
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
When considering drawbacks, LetsDMARC, while feature-rich, might be perceived as more complex for smaller organizations, and its pricing is not transparent. DMARC 25, on the other hand, offers a simpler experience but might lack the advanced functionalities and globalized support expected by larger entities. Its localization could also be a barrier for non-Japanese speaking users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.5 / 5(2)
0 / 5(0)
Great tool for SPF/DMARC integration
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
Ease of use, useful dashboard. Setup was simple and fast. Customer support is at the top.
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
At the moment there is nothing to report about what dislike
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
SPF lookup solved fat with LetsDMARC
Marco P.
System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Intuitive and easy-to-use software
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
The clarity of the instructions provided of the various steps
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
some graphic settings are not retained when changing pages
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Managing SPF, DMARK and DKIM of various sites in a single platform
Massimo G.
System Administrator Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Pricing
LetsDMARC requires you to contact their sales team for pricing, reflecting its enterprise focus, while DMARC 25 offers a transparent one-month free trial before requiring contact for paid plans.
4.5 / 5(2)
