Suped

Glockapps vs.
Parseddmarc in 2026

Glockapps dashboard screenshot
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Parseddmarc dashboard screenshot
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
vs.
We tested GlockApps and Parseddmarc for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. GlockApps was faster to read and better packaged for hosted monitoring; Parseddmarc gave us more control, but every meaningful workflow depended on our own infrastructure and rules.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 4 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Hosted DMARC and deliverability monitoring
Starts at
Free plan available, DMARC-only from $55 / month
Best fit
Marketing and deliverability teams that want hosted reports plus reputation checks
In one line
GlockApps turns DMARC reports into a readable hosted workflow with sender views, alerts, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring.
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Open-source DMARC parser
Starts at
Free software cost
Best fit
Infrastructure teams comfortable running ingestion, storage, and dashboards
In one line
Parseddmarc gives technical teams raw control; Suped's product is the managed third path when guided fixes, hosted records, and published starter pricing matter more than self-hosting.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

TLDR: pick GlockApps for hosted monitoring, Parseddmarc for self-hosted control

Pick Glockapps if
Hosted DMARC and deliverability checks for small marketing teams
We had the primary domain and marketing subdomain collecting reports the same day.
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp appeared in readable source views after daily reports arrived.
The spoof sample was easy to spot, but the unknown sender still needed manual owner assignment.
Free plan available
Pick Parseddmarc if
Self-hosted parsing for technical teams that own the mail pipeline
We could ingest Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace reports once Graph and Gmail credentials were configured.
SendGrid and Mailchimp classification depended on our own naming rules and dashboard filters.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was explainable, but only after reading parsed authentication fields.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Use Suped's product when guided fixes need to turn SPF, DKIM, and DMARC failures into owner-ready tasks.
Its managed workflow fits teams that want automated issue detection and alert quality without writing parser rules.
Published starter pricing helps buyers model domains and monthly volume before procurement.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate and failure reports into source-level views or structured output.
Hosted dashboards
Parser output
Managed analysis
Source detection
Helps identify sending services and owner candidates.
Known source naming
Manual classification
Managed source naming
Forward detection
Separates forwarding patterns from direct authentication failures.
Partial
Manual workflow
Forward-aware classification
Spoof detection
Highlights unauthorized use and failed authentication samples.
Included
Reporting only
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Routes notable failures or report changes to the right owner.
Email alerts
Manual rules
Alerting
Reporting
Gives exportable or recurring reporting for stakeholders.
Reports and exports
JSON and CSV
Reports and exports
API
Supports programmatic access for automation or downstream systems.
Custom subscription
No product API
Available
Multi-tenancy
Separates clients, business units, or domain groups cleanly.
Partial account separation
Index prefixes
MSP workspace support
SPF flattening
Manages SPF lookup limits through a hosted flattening workflow.
Not tested
Not supported
Hosted SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
Hosts or manages the DMARC DNS policy record.
Reporting address only
Self-managed DNS
Hosted DMARC
Hosted SPF
Hosts or manages the SPF record and sender includes.
Not supported
Self-managed DNS
Hosted SPF
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts the MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Parses TLS reports
Hosted MTA-STS
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP or domain reputation across blocklist and blacklist signals.
IP reputation monitors
Not included
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Turns report changes into detected problems instead of raw rows only.
Partial
Rules required
Automatic issue detection
AI copilot
Uses AI assistance to explain and prioritize authentication issues.
Not supported
Not supported
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Checks DNS records for authentication drift and setup problems.
Authentication checks
Not included
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Can be run on your own infrastructure.
Hosted SaaS
Self-hostable
Managed SaaS
Free trial/free tier
Has a free entry path for testing or low volume use.
Free plan available
Free software
Free plan available

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

Each score uses the same editorial rubric across the 90-day test: onboarding, report analysis, owner handoff, enforcement movement, alerts, pricing clarity, and operational maintenance. Higher is better in every row.

GlockApps scored higher on hosted monitoring, Parseddmarc scored higher where teams value control.

GlockApps moved faster on setup, report reading, spoof review, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring, but policy movement still required human judgment. Parseddmarc preserved complete parsed data and flexible routing, but source naming, alert quality, DNS checks, and enforcement planning depended on our own rules and infrastructure.
Glockapps score
61/100
Parseddmarc score
37/100
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
61/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
37/100
DMARC enforcement
4.5
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
4.0
MSP workflows
5.0
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.0
Time to enforcement
4.0

Feature set

Packaged checks vs raw control

GlockApps has broader packaged coverage. Parseddmarc has deeper operator control.

The practical split is packaged monitoring versus open parser control. GlockApps gave us more built-in checks, including reputation monitoring, while Parseddmarc gave us cleaner ownership of the data path. Suped's product is relevant when guided fixes and automated issue detection need to be buying criteria, because the unknown sender and spoof sample required owner-ready decisions.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
Microsoft 365 named quickly
SendGrid mismatch isolated
Blocklist checks included
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Parseddmarc screenshot
Graph ingest worked
CSV exports stayed complete
Subdomain DKIM needed rules
During our 90-day run, GlockApps grouped Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as recognizable senders soon after aggregate reports arrived, and SendGrid plus Mailchimp became readable in source drilldowns after the daily reports settled. The domain-matched SPF pass and domain-matched DKIM pass were clean, and the SPF pass with visible-from mismatch was easy to isolate because the authenticated domain, header-from domain, and disposition appeared together, but our support desk sender and the unknown sender still needed manual classification.
Parseddmarc accepted the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace mailboxes once the Graph and Gmail access pieces were configured, then produced complete JSON and CSV for SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the parked domain. It handled the DKIM pass on a subdomain and the forwarded mail with SPF failure as raw authentication facts, which was accurate, but every sender name, owner note, and next action came from our own rules.

User experience

Readable UI vs operator workflow

GlockApps is quicker for readers. Parseddmarc is cleaner for engineers.

GlockApps was faster for a non-specialist to read after DNS was live. Parseddmarc was cleaner for an engineer who wants files, indexes, and explicit configuration, but that meant more work before anyone outside the mail team could use the result.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender needed labeling
Forwarded SPF had context
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Parseddmarc screenshot
Setup required operator time
Unknown sender found in JSON
Forwarding explanation was manual
We added the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in GlockApps by following the DMARC destination prompts and checking each DNS record. The primary domain had useful source views after the first report cycle; the parked domain stayed quiet, which made the spoof sample stand out, but the unknown sender still required a label and an owner outside the dashboard.
Parseddmarc setup felt like running an ingestion service. Once mailbox access, search storage, and scheduled runs were in place, finding the unknown sender was straightforward in JSON and OpenSearch, but explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure to a marketer required us to translate SPF failure plus DKIM pass into plain DMARC language.

Support

Hosted help vs self support

GlockApps gives a clearer support path. Parseddmarc expects operator ownership.

GlockApps had a clearer support path for hosted setup questions, especially around DNS syntax and plan limits. Parseddmarc had useful documentation, but escalation, monitoring, and enterprise onboarding remained our responsibility.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
DNS answer in one day
Custom API path documented
Phone escalation felt limited
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Parseddmarc screenshot
Docs covered mailbox ingest
No listed support plan
Runbook was our responsibility
In GlockApps, our setup question about the rua value and the marketing subdomain received a useful answer within one business day, and the response separated DNS publication from report processing. Escalation for custom API access was less clear, and enterprise onboarding depended on a sales or custom-plan path rather than a standard workflow we could complete inside the account.
Parseddmarc documentation covered IMAP, Microsoft Graph, Gmail API, Docker secrets, and output destinations well enough for an engineer to complete setup. The support handoff was the hard part: DNS owners, security reviewers, and executives needed our own runbook because there was no listed hosted onboarding, support SLA, or account team.

Suitability

Buyer fit

GlockApps suits marketing-led teams. Parseddmarc suits infrastructure-led teams.

The clearest fit depends on who owns the workflow after setup. GlockApps suits teams that want a hosted dashboard for DMARC and reputation checks; Parseddmarc suits teams that already run ingestion, storage, monitoring, and reporting. Suped's product is relevant when MSP workflows and alert quality need to be built into the operating model, because client handoff and alert routing were manual or partial in our test.
glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
Glockapps screenshot
Best for marketing teams
Agency grouping was partial
Recurring reports were usable
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
Parseddmarc screenshot
Best for operators
Index prefixes separate clients
Handoffs require templates
GlockApps fit the SMB and marketing-team scenario best in our test: the primary domain and marketing subdomain were easy to group, recurring reports were usable, and blocklist or blacklist checks sat near DMARC work. For MSP use, account separation and client handoff felt partial; we could separate domains and users, but recurring client-ready notes still needed our own process.
Parseddmarc fit infrastructure-led teams best. Its index-prefix approach gave us a way to separate client or business-unit data, but MSP reporting, executive summaries, recurring client handoff, and escalation notes had to be built outside the project; for a small business without an operator, the maintenance burden outweighed the $0 software price.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps

Hosted monitoring for marketing-led DMARC programs

After 90 days, GlockApps felt like a packaged deliverability workspace with DMARC reporting included. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were easy to understand in daily reports, and the SendGrid plus Mailchimp traffic was readable enough for a marketer to separate normal campaigns from questionable sources.
The best day-to-day value came from seeing DMARC, inbox testing context, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring near each other. The weaker moments came when we needed enforcement planning: the spoof sample was obvious, but the unknown sender and forwarded mail SPF failure still needed a technical owner to decide the next step.
Where it wins
Fast domain setup
Readable service drilldowns
Useful blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Public DMARC-only pricing
Where it lags
Unknown sender labels stayed manual
Policy guidance needed judgment
API access pointed to custom plans
MSP separation felt limited
Pricing
Free plan, paid DMARC from $55 / month
Free tier
10,000 DMARC messages / month
Onboarding
Three domains live same day
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
github.com logo
Parseddmarc

Self-hosted parser for infrastructure-owned DMARC programs

After 90 days, Parseddmarc felt like a reliable parser rather than a hosted DMARC product. It pulled reports from Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace after credential setup, and its JSON plus CSV output gave us enough detail to build our own views for SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender.
The tradeoff was operational effort. We managed scheduling, storage, dashboards, alert logic, sender naming, and runbooks ourselves, which made the $0 software cost real but not the whole cost of ownership.
Where it wins
$0 software cost
Complete JSON and CSV output
Flexible storage destinations
Self-hosted account separation
Where it lags
No hosted workflow
No packaged alerts
No blocklist monitoring
Classification rules were ours
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Open-source software
Onboarding
Self-hosting required
G2 rating
0 / 5

Pricing

glockapps.com logo
Glockapps
github.com logo
Parseddmarc
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free plan covers this volume with 10,000 DMARC messages per month.
$0
Software cost is zero; hosting and mailbox access still need ownership.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$55 / month
Standalone DMARC Analytics Essential covers 1,000,000 messages and unlimited domains.
$0
No Parseddmarc subscription charge; infrastructure sizing drives cost.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$55 / month
The same DMARC-only tier covers 10 domains at 1,000,000 messages.
$0
Software remains free; storage and search costs rise with retention.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $95 / month
DMARC-only Growth covers 2,000,000 messages; custom plans apply when public limits do not fit.
$0
No published paid tier; support, uptime, and scale are operated by the team.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
GlockApps numbers use public list prices for DMARC Analytics monthly plans; Parseddmarc uses $0 software cost and excludes hosting, storage, backups, monitoring, and staff time, which are estimated operational costs. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Guided remediation
GlockApps surfaced our SPF visible-from mismatch and unknown sender, but owner next steps still needed manual interpretation; Parseddmarc gave raw data without fix guidance. Suped's product turns those cases into guided remediation tasks.
Operational alerts
Parseddmarc sent data to destinations, but alert quality depended on rules we wrote, while GlockApps email alerts lacked the routing control we wanted for support handoff. Suped's product groups alerts by source, severity, and owner.
Client-ready ownership
Parseddmarc separated clients with index prefixes, and GlockApps handled multiple domains, but recurring MSP handoff notes and hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS records were not built into both workflows. Suped's product keeps those ownership steps in one managed workspace.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Glockapps or Parseddmarc?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing