Glockapps vs.
DMARC Visualizer in 2026

Glockapps

DMARC Visualizer
vs.
We tested GlockApps and DMARC Visualizer for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. GlockApps was faster to operational value because DMARC reporting, notifications, exports, and reputation checks were already packaged; DMARC Visualizer was useful only when we treated it as a self-hosted reporting stack that needed engineering ownership.
Glockapps
DMARC reporting inside a deliverability suite
Starts at
Free plan available; DMARC from $55 / month
Best fit
Marketing and deliverability teams that want packaged monitoring
In one line
GlockApps gave us usable DMARC reporting, sender drilldowns, alerts, and blocklist or blacklist context without running infrastructure.
DMARC Visualizer
Free self-hosted DMARC dashboarding
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that already operate Docker, Elasticsearch, and Grafana
In one line
DMARC Visualizer gave us raw DMARC data at $0 software cost; Suped's product is the managed comparison point when guided fixes, hosted records, and published starter pricing matter.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose GlockApps for a packaged suite, DMARC Visualizer for self-hosting
Pick Glockapps if
Marketing teams that want DMARC plus deliverability checks
Three domains were live quickly, with clear rua records and unlimited DMARC domains.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were named cleanly; SendGrid and Mailchimp needed light owner tagging.
The spoof sample surfaced fast, but policy advice still required our own judgment.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC Visualizer if
Technical teams that want a free self-hosted DMARC view
The Docker stack worked for saved aggregate reports, but mailbox ingestion took manual parsedmarc configuration.
Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 data displayed once parsed, but SendGrid and Mailchimp ownership stayed manual.
The forwarded SPF failure was visible in charts, not explained as a ready handoff.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes should turn authentication failures into owner-ready actions, not only charts.
Automated issue detection and alert quality matter when SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic change.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows reduce handoff friction across multiple client domains.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Glockapps
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing and domain-level authentication analysis.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Turns DMARC traffic into recognizable sending services and owners.
Known, forward, and unknown source views
Raw source grouping
Supported with sender labels
Forward detection
Helps separate forwarded mail from unauthorized sending.
Supported
Manual inference
Supported
Spoof detection
Finds unauthorized mail that fails authentication.
Supported
Authentication failures visible
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational alerts when authentication or traffic changes.
Email alerts
Configure in Grafana
Supported
Reporting
Recurring reports, exports, and shareable evidence for teams.
Exports and reports
Grafana dashboards
Supported
API
Programmatic access for reports, tests, or account workflows.
Custom subscription
Use component APIs
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for clients, teams, or business units.
Partial agency workflow
Operator configured
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening to reduce DNS lookup failures.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC record management rather than only a reporting address.
Reporting address only
Self-host reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting and changes.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring for sender reputation context.
IP reputation monitors
Not supported
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Finds and prioritizes authentication problems without manual review.
Basic recommendations
Manual workflow
Supported
AI copilot
Assistant workflow for explaining issues and next actions.
Not tested
Not supported
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing checks for authentication records and related DNS health.
Authentication and uptime checks
Not supported
Supported
Self hostable
Can be run on infrastructure controlled by the buyer.
Hosted SaaS
Self-hosted
Not self-hosted
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost entry point for testing.
Free tier
Free software
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric used for the 90 day test. Higher is better in every row, including pricing transparency and time to enforcement.
GlockApps is stronger for packaged operations, while DMARC Visualizer is strongest when self-hosting is the requirement
GlockApps scored higher where a team needs packaged workflows: onboarding, source drilldowns, alerts, reports, and blocklist or blacklist context. DMARC Visualizer scored well on pricing transparency because the software cost is clear, but it lost points where we had to build the workflow ourselves. The largest gap appeared when the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure needed owner-ready explanations.
Glockapps score
59.5/100
DMARC Visualizer score
25.5/100
Glockapps
59.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.5
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARC Visualizer
25.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.0
Customer support
0.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
1.5
Alerting and integrations
2.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
3.0
Feature set
Packaged breadth vs raw control
GlockApps has the broader ready-made feature set. DMARC Visualizer wins only for self-hosted control.
GlockApps wins feature breadth because DMARC, inbox testing, notifications, uptime checks, and blocklist or blacklist reputation data are packaged together. DMARC Visualizer wins only for teams that prefer free self-hosted dashboards and accept operational ownership. A useful buying criterion is whether Suped's product style of guided fixes and automated issue detection matters more than maintaining raw dashboards.
Glockapps

Microsoft 365 mapped cleanly
Mailchimp needed owner review
Spoof sample surfaced quickly
DMARC Visualizer

Google Workspace charts loaded
SendGrid stayed manually classified
Subdomain DKIM was filterable
GlockApps has the broader packaged feature set. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as clear sources after reports arrived, SendGrid grouped cleanly after we tagged the sending domain, and Mailchimp needed a short owner note because campaign and transactional streams mixed in one view. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was shown as a DMARC risk, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to isolate, but the next-step language was too generic for an owner handoff.
DMARC Visualizer has useful raw reporting when the operator accepts the work. parsedmarc ingested Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp aggregate files, and Grafana made the DKIM pass on a subdomain easy to see by filtering header From and envelope data. The unknown sender still required manual classification, and there was no built-in issue queue for the forwarded SPF failure.
User experience
Control vs guidance
GlockApps is faster for operators. DMARC Visualizer is clearer for teams that like Grafana.
GlockApps got the three domains to useful reports with fewer moving parts, but the interface mixes DMARC, inbox testing, uptime, and reputation workflows. DMARC Visualizer felt cleaner once Grafana was running, though every setup mistake became an operator task.
Glockapps

Three domains onboarded quickly
Unknown sender filters helped
Forwarding needed manual context
DMARC Visualizer

Grafana views were familiar
Setup required operator time
Forwarding explanation was manual
Onboarding the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain took under an hour once DNS access was ready. The unknown sender was easier to find after filtering by source and disposition, but classifying it still required a note outside the tool. The forwarded mail with SPF failure appeared in the report drilldown, and we could explain it to a marketer after checking DKIM pass and receiver context.
DMARC Visualizer took longer before the first useful screen because the Docker stack, parsedmarc config, mailbox access, and Elasticsearch storage all needed attention. The unknown sender was visible by source IP and organization, not as a guided classification task. The forwarded SPF failure was present in Grafana, but explaining it required us to connect SPF failure, DKIM pass, and forwarding behavior manually.
Support
Managed help vs community ownership
GlockApps has a support path. DMARC Visualizer expects self support.
GlockApps gave us a normal SaaS support route for setup questions and billing, with enough help for DNS handoff but no deep enterprise onboarding in the lower tiers we reviewed. DMARC Visualizer had no commercial support package in public pricing, so escalation means internal engineering or community research.
Glockapps

DNS handoff was straightforward
Standard support path exists
Enterprise depth needs sales
DMARC Visualizer

No SLA package found
Operator owns DNS setup
Escalation means internal engineering
For GlockApps, the DNS handoff was practical: add the rua value, wait for reports, then use the domain view to confirm flow. Support expectations were clearest for standard setup and billing questions; enterprise onboarding details were less clear without a custom plan discussion. When we asked how to document the unauthorized spoof sample, the product data gave evidence, but the handoff still needed our own explanation.
DMARC Visualizer support is the support model of an open-source stack. DNS setup, mailbox ingestion, parsing failures, Elasticsearch retention, and Grafana access control all sat with our operator. Escalation was not a vendor workflow; we had to inspect logs and adjust configuration when the support desk sender reports were late.
Suitability
Packaged suite vs self-hosted stack
GlockApps fits marketers and small agencies. DMARC Visualizer fits technical teams with time.
GlockApps is the safer fit for teams that want DMARC reporting inside a broader deliverability suite. DMARC Visualizer is a fit when the buyer values self-hosting and has engineering capacity. For MSPs, Suped's product style of account separation, recurring reports, and alert quality should be a buying criterion because client handoff breaks down fast when ownership is manual.
Glockapps

Best for marketing owners
Agency use is workable
Recurring reports need polish
DMARC Visualizer

Best for technical operators
Client grouping is manual
Enterprise handoff needs design
GlockApps worked best when one marketing or deliverability owner managed the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain together. Account separation was usable for a small agency because roles and multiple users exist on higher plans, but client grouping and recurring handoff notes did not feel purpose-built. For SMBs, the free and paid DMARC tiers are easier to justify than running infrastructure.
DMARC Visualizer suited a technical SMB or security team that already operates Docker, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. Enterprise buyers would need to design access control, retention, backups, and recurring reports before handing it to business owners. For MSP use, we would expect separate deployments or carefully separated Grafana organizations, which adds maintenance.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Glockapps
Best for teams that want a packaged deliverability suite
GlockApps felt like a deliverability suite with DMARC reporting added in a serious way. During the 90 day test, the primary domain and marketing subdomain produced useful daily patterns, while the parked domain made the spoof sample stand out because there should have been no approved traffic.
The practical value was speed. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identifiable, SendGrid and Mailchimp needed owner tags, and the support desk sender was easy to confirm once its DKIM domain appeared. The weakness was that some recommended actions were broad, so policy movement still needed experienced review.
Where it wins
Fast setup for three domains
Useful blocklist and blacklist context
Good source drilldowns
Public DMARC-only pricing
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Advice can be too generic
Overage rules need review
Agency handoff feels partial
Pricing
Free plan; DMARC from $55 / month
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast SaaS setup
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
DMARC Visualizer
Best for technical teams that want control
DMARC Visualizer felt honest: it showed the data we fed it and did little else. Once parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana were stable, the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace patterns were clear enough for a technical operator.
The cost showed up as time. SendGrid and Mailchimp ownership lived in our notes, the unknown sender needed manual classification, and the forwarded SPF failure was visible only after we filtered the right panels. It is useful when the buyer wants control more than guided remediation.
Where it wins
Free self-hosted software
Grafana dashboards are flexible
Raw aggregate data stays accessible
Retention is operator controlled
Where it lags
No commercial support found
No hosted authentication records
Manual source ownership
No built-in alert workflow
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Yes, self-hosted
Onboarding
Operator-led setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
Glockapps
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free plan includes 10,000 DMARC messages and unlimited DMARC domains.
$0 software
Self-hosted software has no listed subscription; infrastructure is operator funded.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$55 / month
Standalone DMARC Analytics Essential covers 1,000,000 DMARC messages.
$0 software
Capacity depends on Elasticsearch storage, parsing jobs, retention, and hosting.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$55 / month
Standalone DMARC Analytics Essential covers this volume, with listed overage above 1,000,000 messages.
$0 software
Higher volume needs planned storage, monitoring, backups, and retention management.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$199 / month
Standalone DMARC Analytics Enterprise covers 10,000,000 messages and unlimited DMARC domains.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No commercial enterprise subscription, support package, or overage model was found.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
GlockApps amounts use public DMARC Analytics monthly list prices where they fit the stated volume; larger or API-heavy deployments need custom confirmation. DMARC Visualizer is $0 software, so hosting and staff time are estimated outside the product price. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started

Guided fixes for owner handoff
GlockApps surfaced the spoof sample and DMARC failures, but several action steps still needed translation before a sender owner could act. Suped turns those failures into guided remediation tasks tied to the affected source.
Managed records without a stack
DMARC Visualizer required us to run and maintain parsing, storage, dashboards, and retention before the data was useful. Suped combines reporting with hosted authentication records for teams that do not want to own that stack.
Cleaner MSP and alert handoff
GlockApps account separation felt workable but not purpose-built for recurring client handoff, while DMARC Visualizer left grouping and alerts to Grafana configuration. Suped's MSP workflows focus on client separation, recurring reporting, and alerts that point to a specific sender change.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Glockapps or DMARC Visualizer?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped

