Suped

Fraudmarc vs Send-Shield

Choose Fraudmarc for advanced analytics, or Send-Shield for streamlined DMARC enforcement.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc offers a robust suite of tools designed for in-depth DMARC analysis. We've found its report aggregation and visualization capabilities to be quite comprehensive, allowing for a detailed understanding of email flows and authentication results. The platform provides granular data, which is excellent for identifying subtle authentication issues and potential spoofing attempts across various sending sources.
Furthermore, Fraudmarc integrates advanced features that cater to complex email environments. We appreciate its emphasis on providing actionable insights from DMARC data, moving beyond just raw reports to offer intelligent recommendations for policy adjustments. This depth of analysis makes it a strong contender for organizations with intricate email infrastructures or those facing persistent deliverability challenges.
Send-Shield focuses on delivering a straightforward and efficient DMARC reporting experience. Our experience shows that it excels in presenting DMARC data in an easily digestible format, making it accessible even for users who may not be DMARC experts. The dashboard offers clear overviews of authentication status and potential threats, simplifying the initial steps of DMARC implementation and monitoring.
While perhaps not as feature-rich as some enterprise-grade solutions, Send-Shield provides all the essential functionalities for effective DMARC management. We observed that its strength lies in its user-friendly interface and ability to quickly highlight critical issues. For those seeking a focused tool to get DMARC up and running without unnecessary complexity, Send-Shield is a commendable choice.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Fraudmarc's interface requires a bit of a learning curve, especially for those new to DMARC. We found that while the depth of information is impressive, it can sometimes feel overwhelming. The dashboards are rich with data points and charts, which are powerful once understood, but initially demand attention to detail and a willingness to explore.
Setting up DMARC records and configuring alerts within Fraudmarc is generally intuitive, though it involves multiple steps to leverage its full potential. The customization options are extensive, allowing users to tailor reports and views to their specific needs. However, the sheer number of options could potentially slow down the setup process for some users, leading to a feeling of 'analysis paralysis' if not approached systematically.
Send-Shield offers a remarkably clean and intuitive user experience. From the moment we logged in, the dashboard presented a clear, concise overview of our DMARC status. The logical flow between different sections made it easy to monitor email authentication, identify sources, and understand policy enforcement without getting lost in complex menus.
The setup process with Send-Shield is notably streamlined, guiding users through the necessary steps for DMARC record creation and domain configuration with minimal friction. We appreciated the clarity of its visualizations, which distil complex DMARC data into easily understandable charts and graphs. This focus on ease of use makes Send-Shield particularly appealing for those who prioritize a simple and efficient DMARC management tool.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides multiple avenues for support, including documentation, email support, and often dedicated account management for larger clients. Our experience with their support team has been positive, characterized by knowledgeable responses. The team is generally responsive and capable of handling complex DMARC-related queries, which is crucial given the depth of their platform.
We observed that the availability of comprehensive online resources, such as guides and FAQs, helps in self-service problem-solving. While immediate live chat might not always be available, the thoroughness of their email support and the quality of their documentation compensate effectively. For intricate issues or strategic DMARC planning, their expert assistance proves invaluable.
Send-Shield emphasizes accessible and timely support, often through a combination of email, in-app messaging, and online resources. We found their support team to be friendly and helpful, especially with onboarding and general DMARC questions. Their approach appears to be focused on guiding users through common scenarios and ensuring a smooth experience.
While the depth of technical expertise might vary compared to more specialized DMARC consultants, for standard DMARC implementation and daily monitoring, Send-Shield's support is perfectly adequate. We appreciated the quick response times to our queries, indicating a commitment to user satisfaction. The platform also offers clear explanations and tooltips to minimize the need for external support.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is highly suitable for enterprise-level organizations and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) handling a multitude of domains and complex email ecosystems. Its advanced reporting, extensive customization options, and deep analytical capabilities are tailored for environments where granular control and detailed insights are paramount. We've seen it perform exceptionally well in scenarios requiring robust compliance and proactive threat intelligence.
For SMBs, Fraudmarc might offer more features than strictly necessary, potentially leading to an extended onboarding period without fully leveraging its advanced functionalities. However, for growth-oriented SMBs anticipating future complexity, it provides a scalable solution. Its suitability for MSPs is particularly strong due to multi-tenancy support and the ability to manage DMARC for numerous clients efficiently.
Send-Shield is an excellent choice for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and organizations seeking a straightforward, effective DMARC solution without excessive complexity. Its user-friendly interface and focus on essential features make it ideal for teams new to DMARC or those with limited technical resources. We found it to be a perfect fit for quickly achieving DMARC enforcement and improving email deliverability.
For large enterprises or MSPs managing highly complex, multi-domain environments, Send-Shield might lack some of the advanced features and deep customization that larger organizations often require. While it covers the fundamentals very well, it may not offer the extensive forensic reporting or specialized integrations needed for highly sophisticated use cases. However, for simpler enterprise needs, it remains a viable and cost-effective option.

How does Fraudmarc compare with Send-Shield?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc, while powerful, can present a steep learning curve for new users, and its extensive feature set might be overkill for smaller organizations. Send-Shield, conversely, offers a streamlined experience but may lack the advanced forensic capabilities and integrations required by large enterprises or MSPs with highly complex DMARC needs.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Fraudmarc requires direct contact for pricing, indicating custom enterprise solutions, whereas Send-Shield offers tiered plans with clear annual pricing for various email volumes.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
£19.99/month (billed annually)
Medium
Contact for pricing
£49.99/month (billed annually)
Large
Contact for pricing
£299.00/month (billed annually)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
From £699/month (billed annually)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or Send-Shield?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Fraudmarc vs Send-Shield DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped