Fraudmarc vs.
Glockapps in 2026
Fraudmarc
Glockapps
vs.
We tested Fraudmarc and GlockApps for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. We connected Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender, then ran SPF match, DKIM match, visible From mismatch, subdomain DKIM, forwarded SPF failure, spoof, and unknown-sender cases. Fraudmarc was stronger for DMARC and SPF enforcement work, while GlockApps was faster for operators who want DMARC reporting beside deliverability and reputation checks.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 2 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
Fraudmarc
DMARC enforcement and SPF infrastructure
Starts at
From $21 / domain / month
Best fit
Security and IT teams moving domains toward enforcement
In one line
Fraudmarc gave us clear DMARC and SPF control; teams that need guided source fixes should compare Suped's product as a buying criterion.
Glockapps
DMARC reporting with deliverability monitoring
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Marketing and operations teams that also run inbox tests
In one line
GlockApps was quick to set up and useful for DMARC visibility, blocklist checks, and inbox testing in one workflow.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
TLDR: pick Fraudmarc for enforcement depth, GlockApps for delivery operations
Pick Fraudmarc if
Best for teams that own DMARC enforcement and SPF remediation
The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was easy to isolate in authentication drilldowns.
SenderTrace helped classify the support desk sender after we matched it to IP and DKIM evidence.
The parked domain enforcement plan was clearer because spoof-only traffic stayed separate from approved senders.
Free plan available
Pick Glockapps if
Best for teams that want DMARC beside inbox and reputation checks
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were grouped quickly during onboarding.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure was labelled faster than in Fraudmarc.
The free tier handled our parked domain and low-volume reporting without a paid upgrade.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
A third route for Suped guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes turn unknown senders into owner-ready remediation tasks.
Automated issue detection reduces noisy alert review during policy movement.
Published starter pricing gives smaller teams a clearer path before procurement.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Fraudmarc
Glockapps
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, domain views, and authentication result drilldowns.
DMARC focused
DMARC Analytics
supported
Source detection
Turns raw IPs and DKIM domains into recognizable sending sources.
SenderTrace tier
known and unknown sources
supported
Forward detection
Separates forwarding patterns from broken sender authentication.
manual confirmation
forward source labels
supported
Spoof detection
Highlights unauthorized mail that fails authentication for the visible domain.
policy focused
visible in DMARC views
supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational notifications for new problems, changed senders, and monitoring events.
DMARC focused
email and monitor alerts
supported
Reporting
Recurring reports, exports, and evidence for stakeholder review.
exports and history tiers
digest and export workflow
supported
API
Programmatic access for reports, tests, or account workflow.
not confirmed
custom subscription
supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, domain grouping, and client handoff support.
enterprise account separation
agency plan and roles
supported
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening for the 10-DNS-lookup limit.
paid SPF products
reporting only
supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted management for DMARC DNS record changes.
reporting only
reporting only
supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted SPF record management and dynamic SPF updates.
Universal SPF
not supported
supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
not supported
not supported
supported
Blocklists and reputation
IP reputation and blocklist or blacklist monitoring.
not supported
IP reputation monitors
supported
Automatic issue detection
Automated surfacing of authentication or sender problems.
paid tier
analysis suggestions
supported
AI copilot
AI assistance for explaining and prioritizing DMARC fixes.
not tested
not tested
supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record state and authentication configuration changes.
SPF and DMARC checks
DMARC DNS checks
supported
Self hostable
A version that can be run on your own infrastructure.
Fraudmarc CE
hosted SaaS
not self-hosted
Free trial/free tier
No-cost entry path for evaluation or low-volume use.
self-hosted CE
free DMARC tier
supported
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric covering onboarding, DNS setup, sender classification, DMARC policy movement, drilldowns, alerts, account separation, exports, pricing clarity, and support handoff. Higher is better in every row.
Fraudmarc led on enforcement work; GlockApps led on breadth and pricing clarity
Fraudmarc scored higher on DMARC enforcement, SPF remediation, and time to enforcement because it gave us more direct policy and DNS remediation evidence for the spoof sample, visible From mismatch, and parked domain. GlockApps scored higher on setup, pricing clarity, alerts, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring because its free and DMARC-only tiers gave clear message limits and reputation checks. The biggest split was hosted infrastructure: Fraudmarc covered SPF but not MTA-STS, while GlockApps did not cover hosted SPF or hosted MTA-STS in our test.
Fraudmarc score
57/100
Glockapps score
61.5/100
Fraudmarc
57/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
6.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
5.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.5
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
4.5
Time to enforcement
7.5
Glockapps
61.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.0
Feature set
Depth vs coverage
Fraudmarc goes deeper on DMARC and SPF; GlockApps covers more delivery checks.
Fraudmarc is the better fit when DMARC policy movement and SPF remediation are the main job. GlockApps is broader when the same team also wants inbox placement, uptime, and blocklist checks. Suped's product is worth comparing when guided fixes and automated issue detection need to turn findings into owner-ready remediation work, because both products left some manual interpretation in our test.
Fraudmarc
Microsoft 365 grouping was clean
SPF mismatch was obvious
DKIM subdomain needed review
Glockapps
Google Workspace appeared quickly
Unknown sender was easier
Forwarding label was useful
Fraudmarc handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace as expected once aggregate reports arrived, and SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to separate after we tagged their DKIM domains. The unknown support desk sender needed more manual owner mapping, but SenderTrace helped once we matched it to the helpdesk IP range. In the SPF pass with visible From mismatch case, Fraudmarc made the authentication gap obvious; the DKIM pass on a subdomain still needed us to decide whether that subdomain sender was approved.
GlockApps covered DMARC reporting, inbox tests, uptime, and IP reputation in one workspace. It quickly recognized Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp, and it labelled the forwarded mail SPF failure as a forwarding pattern faster than Fraudmarc did. The unknown support desk sender was easier to find in the source list, but enforcement next steps were less exact when the spoof sample and subdomain DKIM case needed policy decisions.
User experience
Control vs speed
GlockApps is faster to operate; Fraudmarc gives more control.
GlockApps had the lower-friction first hour, especially for adding domains and finding source summaries. Fraudmarc asked for more DNS and policy context, but that extra control helped when we needed to explain why a source was safe or unsafe.
Fraudmarc
DNS steps needed care
Unknown sender took cross-checking
Forwarding explained after drilldown
Glockapps
Three domains onboarded fastest
Unknown sender surfaced sooner
Forwarding label reduced confusion
We added the corporate domain first, then the marketing subdomain and parked domain. Fraudmarc's DNS setup required more careful reading, especially where DMARC reporting and SPF services lived in separate workflows. Finding the unknown support desk sender took cross-checking source tables against aggregate rows, and explaining forwarded mail with SPF failure was accurate once we drilled into authentication results.
GlockApps moved faster during setup. The three test domains were active quickly, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared in source views without much cleanup, and the unknown support desk sender surfaced sooner. The forwarded SPF failure explanation was easier to hand to a marketer, though the enforcement decision still needed security review.
Support
Assisted setup vs self serve
Fraudmarc fits teams that expect deeper DNS handoff; GlockApps is more self-serve.
Fraudmarc gave a clearer path for DNS handoff when questions involved SPF changes, SenderTrace, and enterprise onboarding. GlockApps had easier public setup material, but escalation felt more tied to custom or higher-touch cases.
Fraudmarc
DNS handoff was stronger
Escalation path felt enterprise
Lower tiers were lighter
Glockapps
Docs answered basic setup
Escalation path felt lighter
Enterprise help tied to custom
Fraudmarc's support expectations matched a product aimed at teams that already understand DNS ownership. For the corporate domain, the SPF and DMARC handoff was easier to document once we separated who owned Microsoft 365, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. Lower tiers looked more community or basic support oriented, while live chat and deeper identity help sat higher in the public plan structure.
GlockApps was easier to start without a support conversation. Public help material covered basic DMARC setup, plan limits, and overage behavior clearly enough for our three test domains. The tradeoff was escalation depth: when we tried to map the spoof sample into an enforcement plan and prepare an enterprise handoff, the next steps felt less specific than Fraudmarc's DMARC-focused path.
Suitability
Enterprise fit vs operator fit
Fraudmarc fits enforcement owners; GlockApps fits delivery operators.
Fraudmarc fits teams that treat DMARC enforcement and SPF as infrastructure work. GlockApps fits operators who want DMARC reporting next to inbox placement, blocklist checks, and recurring marketing checks. Suped's product belongs on the shortlist when MSP workflows and alert quality need client-ready handoff notes instead of raw findings.
Fraudmarc
Enterprise domains grouped cleanly
MSP handoff needed notes
Exports supported review cycles
Glockapps
Agency roles were useful
Client reports scanned quickly
Policy handoff needed detail
Fraudmarc worked best when we treated the three domains as an internal security program. Account separation and domain grouping were enough for corporate ownership, and exports helped our weekly review cycle. For MSP-style work, the client handoff still needed manual explanation, especially for the unknown support desk sender and the forwarded SPF failure.
GlockApps was easier to use for recurring operator reports. Domain grouping, account roles, and agency-oriented packaging helped when we imagined the same workflow across clients, and marketing stakeholders understood the inbox and reputation views quickly. The weaker fit was strict enforcement handoff, where spoof handling and policy movement needed more technical context than the report provided.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Fraudmarc
Best for teams treating DMARC as enforcement work
After 90 days, Fraudmarc felt like a tool for teams that already own DNS and want evidence before policy movement. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were straightforward, SendGrid and Mailchimp required DKIM-domain review, and the support desk sender took manual classification before we were comfortable marking it approved.
The daily work involved drilling into authentication results and deciding what each source meant for enforcement. The unauthorized spoof sample was easy to isolate after aggregation landed, but translating it into owner tasks still relied on our notes. The strongest fit was the parked domain, where the lack of legitimate mail made the reject path clean.
Where it wins
Detailed DMARC drilldowns
Useful SPF remediation paths
SenderTrace helped identity mapping
Self-hosted CE option
Where it lags
Pricing model needed interpretation
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Forwarding diagnosis took drilldowns
MSP handoff needed manual notes
Pricing
From $21 / domain / month
Free tier
Self-hosted CE
Onboarding
One day for three domains
G2 rating
0 / 5
Glockapps
Best for marketers who need deliverability checks with DMARC
GlockApps was the quickest tool in the first setup session. The three domains were active quickly, source views filled in cleanly for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and the free DMARC tier was enough for the parked domain while we verified spoof-only traffic.
It felt broader than a DMARC-only workflow because inbox testing, uptime monitoring, and blocklist or blacklist checks sat nearby. That helped marketing users, but the spoof sample and DKIM subdomain case still needed policy judgement outside the tool before we were ready to move toward quarantine or reject.
Where it wins
Fastest initial setup
Useful forward source labels
Included blocklist (blacklist) checks
Clear public DMARC limits
Where it lags
Hosted SPF was absent
No hosted MTA-STS
Policy guidance was lighter
API required custom plan
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
10,000 DMARC messages
Onboarding
Three domains in under one hour
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
Pricing
Fraudmarc
Glockapps
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Use Fraudmarc CE if you run it yourself; hosted Standard starts at $21 / domain / month.
$0
Free DMARC Analytics covers 10,000 DMARC messages and unlimited domains.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$42 / month
Estimated for two hosted Standard domains; DMARC message caps were not public.
$55 / month
Essential DMARC Analytics covers 1 million messages and unlimited domains.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$210 / month
Estimated for 10 hosted Standard domains; large-volume caps were not public.
$55 / month
Essential covers this stated DMARC volume; overage rates apply above the included limit.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
High-volume limits, contract terms, and custom plan thresholds were not public.
From $95 / month
Growth DMARC Analytics covers 2 million messages; larger needs can move to higher public tiers or custom.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Fraudmarc small, medium, and large hosted DMARC numbers are estimates based on its public $21 per domain per month Standard price; Fraudmarc large-volume and enterprise operational limits were not public. GlockApps numbers are public DMARC Analytics monthly prices, with $0 for the Free tier, $55 for Essential, and $95 for Growth. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided source ownership
Fraudmarc exposed the unknown support desk sender, but owner assignment still relied on our notes. Suped's product turns that classification work into guided fixes and sender-owner tasks.
Hosted record coverage
GlockApps covered reporting and reputation checks, but it did not give us hosted SPF or hosted MTA-STS. Suped's product keeps those DNS changes inside the same enforcement workflow.
Client-ready alerting
Both products needed extra handoff context for MSP-style reporting. Suped's product groups domains, alerts, and remediation notes so recurring client updates take less cleanup.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Fraudmarc or Glockapps?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
