DMARCEye vs.
Glockapps in 2026
DMARCEye
Glockapps
vs.
We tested DMARCEye and GlockApps for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and one support desk sender connected. DMARCEye felt sharper for DMARC reporting and sender cleanup, while GlockApps made more sense when inbox testing and blacklist/blocklist reputation checks mattered as much as DMARC.
DMARCEye
DMARC reporting for SMBs and agencies
Starts at
Free; Scale from $4 / domain / month annually
Best fit
Lean teams that want DMARC source clarity
In one line
DMARCEye made Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp easier to separate, but buyers comparing Suped's product should also score guided fix ownership.
Glockapps
Deliverability testing with DMARC analytics
Starts at
Free; DMARC-only from $55 / month
Best fit
Marketing and deliverability teams that run seed tests
In one line
GlockApps paired DMARC reports with inbox placement, IP reputation, and blacklist/blocklist monitoring, though DMARC enforcement work needed more manual interpretation.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose DMARCEye for DMARC cleanup, GlockApps for deliverability testing
Pick DMARCEye if
Best for teams that want clean DMARC reporting without a large suite
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were grouped under clear, recognizable sender names.
The unauthorized spoof sample stood out quickly against the parked domain baseline.
The Scale plan made the three-domain setup predictable, although subdomains needed slot planning.
Free plan available
Pick Glockapps if
Best for marketing teams that want DMARC plus inbox placement tests
SendGrid and Mailchimp activity sat beside seed-test context for campaign troubleshooting.
Forwarded mail was easier to separate from spoofing because GlockApps labeled forward sources distinctly.
Pricing worked for mixed deliverability use, but DMARC-only buyers had to watch message quotas and overage.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped's product fits teams that want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Use guided fixes when source detection must become an owner-ready DNS or vendor task.
Prioritize automated issue detection and alert quality when one unknown sender needs classification before policy movement.
Check MSP workflows and published starter pricing when client handoff needs predictable domain costs.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCEye
Glockapps
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report processing, pass and fail breakdowns, and drilldowns by sender.
Clear DMARC-first reports
DMARC analytics included
Supported
Source detection
Ability to turn raw IPs and domains into recognizable services and owners.
Strong sender naming
Known and unknown source labels
Supported
Forward detection
Ability to separate forwarded mail with SPF failure from spoofing.
Partial, needed notes
Forward labels helped
Supported
Spoof detection
Visibility into unauthorized mail against the tested domains.
Clear parked-domain signal
Detected as unknown failure
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Alerting for new sources, authentication failures, and operational changes.
Paid smart alerts
Email and monitoring alerts
Supported
Reporting
Exports, recurring reports, and stakeholder-ready summaries.
Exports and domain reports
Deliverability and DMARC reports
Supported
API
Programmatic access for reporting, tests, or account workflows.
Scale and Agency access
Custom subscriptions
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, grouped accounts, and handoff workflows.
Agency tier
Account roles only
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed flattening for SPF records that hit DNS lookup limits.
Not supported
Checker workflow only
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC record management rather than reporting address guidance only.
Reporting only
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records for source changes and lookup control.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy file and DNS workflow for MTA-STS.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blacklist/blocklist and reputation checks tied to mail operations.
Blacklist/blocklist monitoring
IP reputation monitors
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automated flags for authentication drift, new sources, or risky changes.
AI monitoring
Partial recommendations
Supported
AI copilot
AI assistance for interpreting reports and turning failures into next steps.
AI layer available
Recommendations, not copilot
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing DNS record checks after initial setup.
DMARC record checks
Authentication checks only
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on owned infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
No-cost entry path for testing the product.
Free tier and trial
Free tier
Free tier and trial
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric covering DMARC enforcement, source resolution, onboarding, support, alerts, account workflows, hosted records, blacklist/blocklist monitoring, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement. Higher is better in every row.
DMARCEye led on DMARC-focused cleanup, while GlockApps scored higher where deliverability monitoring broadened the job.
DMARCEye scored higher on source resolution and setup because Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp became clean sender groups faster. GlockApps scored better on blacklist/blocklist monitoring because IP reputation checks were closer to the same workflow as inbox placement tests. Both lost all hosted-record points because neither product handled hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or hosted DMARC management during the test.
DMARCEye score
67/100
Glockapps score
57.5/100
DMARCEye
67/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Glockapps
57.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.0
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
5.0
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
5.5
Feature set
DMARC depth vs deliverability breadth
DMARCEye wins on DMARC source cleanup. GlockApps wins when inbox testing is part of the job.
DMARCEye gave us the cleaner path through DMARC evidence, especially when the unauthorized spoof sample hit the parked domain. GlockApps had broader deliverability coverage through seed tests, IP reputation, and blacklist/blocklist monitoring. For teams comparing Suped's product too, guided fixes and automated issue detection are practical buying criteria because detection without ownership still leaves follow-up work.
DMARCEye
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid ownership was clear
Visible From mismatch surfaced
Glockapps
Google Workspace surfaced fast
Mailchimp tied to campaigns
Forward source labels helped
DMARCEye kept the test centered on DMARC reports. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were identified quickly, SendGrid and Mailchimp separated into their own source groups, and the support desk sender was easy to approve once we matched its DKIM domain. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible in the drilldown, but the tool still expected us to turn that finding into a vendor or DNS task.
GlockApps covered more than DMARC. It connected the same Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic to a broader deliverability workspace with inbox testing and IP reputation checks. The unknown sender landed in a clear unknown bucket, and the forwarded mail with SPF failure was easier to explain than in DMARCEye, but the DMARC policy movement guidance felt less focused.
User experience
Guidance vs breadth
DMARCEye was faster for DMARC work. GlockApps took longer because the workspace covered more jobs.
DMARCEye had the calmer DMARC experience when we added the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. GlockApps was usable, but the DMARC path shared attention with inbox testing, uptime monitors, and reputation checks.
DMARCEye
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender needed classification
Forwarding needed owner notes
Glockapps
Suite choices slowed setup
Unknown filter worked well
Forward label was clearer
DMARCEye took about half an hour to get the three test domains receiving aggregate reports. The DNS setup text was easy to hand to an admin, and the parked domain stayed quiet until the spoof sample arrived. The unknown sender took a manual classification step, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed our own explanation so a non-technical owner did not treat it as a spoof.
GlockApps got DMARC ingestion working quickly, but the first session asked us to make more product choices than a DMARC-only buyer needs. Finding the unknown sender was straightforward once we filtered to unknown sources, and the forwarded mail SPF failure had a clearer forward-source label. The tradeoff was screen density: the team had to ignore deliverability modules when the task was only DMARC enforcement.
Support
Focused help vs self-serve range
DMARCEye was easier to hand off during setup. GlockApps relied more on self-serve interpretation.
DMARCEye gave clearer DNS handoff points for a small admin team, especially when we asked how to treat the parked domain and marketing subdomain separately. GlockApps had more help material around the wider deliverability suite, but enterprise onboarding and escalation expectations were less direct during our DMARC-specific test.
DMARCEye
DNS handoff was cleaner
Priority support on paid
Agency for larger portfolios
Glockapps
Documentation covered suite setup
Escalation felt self-serve
Enterprise path was less clear
For DMARCEye, the cleanest support moment was the DNS handoff. We could copy the reporting record instructions into an internal ticket, add notes for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and keep the parked domain under a stricter review path. Scale included priority support language, while Agency was the path for multi-tenant and larger onboarding needs.
For GlockApps, the setup path leaned on documentation and product prompts. The DMARC record setup was not hard, but escalation around the support desk sender and the SPF pass with visible From mismatch felt more like a self-serve investigation. The wider suite was useful for marketing teams, yet enterprise onboarding clarity was weaker when the job was DMARC enforcement.
Suitability
DMARC operator vs deliverability operator
DMARCEye fits DMARC ownership better. GlockApps fits teams that already run deliverability testing.
DMARCEye is the better fit when a team wants DMARC reporting, source cleanup, and a practical route toward quarantine or reject. GlockApps is the better fit when the same team also needs inbox placement, IP reputation, and blacklist/blocklist checks. If client handoff, account separation, and alert quality are core buying criteria, Suped's product belongs in the comparison because MSP workflows need more than shared reports.
DMARCEye
SMB DMARC ownership fit
Agency tier for portfolios
Reports worked for handoff
Glockapps
Marketing teams get more
Campaign reports share well
MSP separation felt manual
DMARCEye worked best for an SMB or internal IT team that owns authentication cleanup. Account separation was enough for a direct team on Scale, while Agency was the logical route for client portfolios. Recurring reports were useful for handoff, but MSPs still need to verify how much client grouping, owner notes, and alert routing they get before they scale beyond a few domains.
GlockApps worked best for marketing and deliverability operators who already run seed-list tests and reputation checks. Its client handoff was stronger for campaign deliverability reports than for DMARC remediation ownership. For MSPs, the user roles and report sharing helped, but they did not feel like a dedicated multi-tenant operating model during our test.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCEye
A DMARC-focused tool for teams that want source cleanup first
After 90 days, DMARCEye felt like a tool built for the person responsible for DMARC cleanup. The primary corporate domain gave us steady Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace volume, the marketing subdomain separated SendGrid and Mailchimp cleanly, and the parked domain made the spoof sample easy to spot.
The main friction was moving from evidence to assigned work. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch and the DKIM pass on a subdomain were visible, but we still had to write the remediation notes. That was acceptable for a small team with one owner, but it adds process work for an MSP or enterprise handoff.
Where it wins
Clean sender grouping for core platforms
Fast parked-domain spoof visibility
Simple domain-slot pricing model
Useful blacklist/blocklist monitoring
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
No DNS management in the workflow
Manual owner notes for fixes
Agency pricing not publicly listed
Pricing
Free; Scale from $4 / domain / month annually
Free tier
1 domain, 5k emails / month
Onboarding
Three domains in one session
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Glockapps
A deliverability workspace for teams that want DMARC alongside inbox tests
After 90 days, GlockApps felt strongest when the question was broader than DMARC. The same SendGrid and Mailchimp traffic that appeared in aggregate reports could be considered next to inbox tests, IP reputation monitors, uptime checks, and blacklist/blocklist alerts.
For pure DMARC enforcement, the workflow was heavier. The unknown sender was easy to find, and the forwarded mail SPF failure had a useful label, but the next step often remained a human decision. Pricing also required more attention because message quotas, overage, bundle plans, and standalone DMARC plans all mattered.
Where it wins
Inbox testing beside DMARC reports
Strong IP reputation coverage
Forward-source labeling helped
Public DMARC-only pricing
Where it lags
DMARC enforcement guidance was thinner
Suite navigation added noise
Overage rules needed budgeting
MSP handoff felt manual
Pricing
Free; DMARC-only from $55 / month
Free tier
10k DMARC messages / month
Onboarding
Fast DMARC, broader suite setup
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
Pricing
DMARCEye
Glockapps
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers one domain and 5,000 tracked emails per month.
$0
Free covers 10,000 DMARC messages and unlimited DMARC domains.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From $8 / month
Estimated from Scale annual pricing at $4 per domain per month.
$55 / month
DMARC Analytics Essential covers 1,000,000 DMARC messages.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From $40 / month
Estimated from Scale annual pricing, subject to live per-domain volume limits.
$55 / month
DMARC Analytics Essential fits the stated volume before overage.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Agency pricing applies for larger portfolios, multi-tenancy, or high volume.
From $95 / month
DMARC Analytics Growth covers 2,000,000 messages, with higher tiers and custom plans above that.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCEye medium and large numbers are estimates from the public Scale annual list price of $4 per domain per month. GlockApps prices use public DMARC Analytics monthly list prices. Custom and volume-dependent cases need checkout or sales confirmation. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Turn findings into fixes
DMARCEye showed the visible From mismatch and subdomain DKIM case clearly, but the owner-ready fix notes were still manual. Suped ties source findings to guided remediation steps so the DNS or vendor task is easier to assign.
Reduce suite noise
GlockApps helped when inbox placement and reputation checks mattered, but DMARC-only enforcement work competed with seed tests and monitoring screens. Suped keeps DMARC remediation, hosted records, and source ownership in the same workflow.
Make client handoff cleaner
Both tools required extra structure for MSP-style handoff during our account separation and recurring reporting checks. Suped gives MSPs client workflows, alert routing, and per-domain pricing that fit repeated handoff work.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCEye or Glockapps?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
