Suped

DMARCAnalyzer vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on

Choose DMARCAnalyzer for a dedicated SaaS platform, choose Splunk TA-DMARC for Splunk integration.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, offers a comprehensive DMARC reporting and analysis platform designed to guide users through DMARC implementation and enforcement. It provides detailed insights into email authentication, identifying legitimate and fraudulent email sources.
We found its feature set to be robust, encompassing SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record checks, as well as forensic and aggregate report analysis. It focuses on presenting complex DMARC data in an easily digestible format, assisting with domain protection and brand indicator for message identification (BIMI) implementation.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is designed to ingest and parse DMARC aggregate reports within a Splunk environment. It leverages Splunk's powerful search and reporting capabilities to provide visibility into DMARC compliance and email authentication failures. Its primary function is to transform DMARC XML data into Splunk-searchable events.
As an add-on, its feature set is inherently tied to Splunk's ecosystem. While it successfully brings DMARC data into Splunk, the advanced analytical features, such as source identification, spoof detection, and dedicated reporting, largely depend on the user's ability to configure Splunk dashboards and searches effectively. It does not offer standalone DMARC management features.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer provides a dedicated, web-based interface that is generally intuitive and user-friendly. We found the dashboards to be well-organized, offering clear visualisations of DMARC compliance rates, sending sources, and potential threats. The setup process is streamlined, focusing on guiding users through DNS record configuration.
Its UX is designed for DMARC specialists and general IT users alike, aiming to simplify the often-complex world of email authentication. The platform includes educational resources and a step-by-step approach to help users achieve DMARC enforcement.
The user experience for the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is entirely dependent on the user's familiarity with Splunk. While installing the add-on itself is relatively straightforward within Splunkbase, extracting meaningful insights requires proficiency in Splunk Search Processing Language (SPL) and dashboard creation. It lacks a dedicated, user-friendly DMARC-specific interface.
For Splunk power users, this integration can be powerful, allowing them to correlate DMARC data with other security logs. However, for those new to Splunk or seeking a plug-and-play DMARC solution, the learning curve can be steep, as the add-on itself provides raw data rather than ready-to-use analytics or visualisations out of the box.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer, as a commercial product from Mimecast, offers professional support channels, including documentation, online resources, and direct customer support. Users typically have access to support teams for assistance with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting DMARC issues.
We expect a managed service like DMARCAnalyzer to provide dedicated support to ensure customers can effectively utilise the platform and achieve their DMARC goals. This is a significant advantage for organisations requiring reliable assistance.
A critical point for the Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is its support status. It is explicitly listed as "Not Supported" and "Archived" on Splunkbase. This means there is no official support from the developer, and it may not receive further updates or active development. This is not ideal for an email security tool.
Organisations choosing this add-on must be prepared to handle all maintenance, troubleshooting, and potential customisation internally. While the Splunk community might offer some informal assistance, relying solely on community support for a critical security function carries significant risks. This lack of support is a major drawback.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer is highly suitable for SMBs, enterprises, and MSPs (managed service providers) that need a dedicated, user-friendly platform for DMARC implementation and monitoring. Its guided approach and clear reporting make it accessible to organisations without deep DMARC expertise.
MSPs can leverage its multi-tenancy capabilities to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently. Enterprise users benefit from its comprehensive features and enterprise-grade support, crucial for protecting large domains and complex email infrastructures.
The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on is best suited for organisations that are already heavily invested in Splunk for their security information and event management (SIEM) or other data analytics needs. It appeals to users who possess strong Splunk administration and search language skills and want to consolidate DMARC data within their existing Splunk environment.
It is less suitable for SMBs or organisations without a pre-existing Splunk infrastructure and expertise. MSPs would find it challenging to manage multiple clients effectively due to its unsupported nature and lack of built-in multi-tenancy. Its archived status also makes it a risky choice for long-term enterprise use where continuous development and support are paramount.

How does DMARCAnalyzer compare with Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCAnalyzer is a solid, dedicated DMARC platform, but its pricing can be an unknown without direct contact, and the dependency on Mimecast could be a factor for some. The Splunk TA-DMARC add-on's primary drawbacks are its "Not Supported" and "Archived" status, meaning no ongoing development or official assistance. This makes it a risky choice for anything beyond experimental or highly specific, self-maintained use cases.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCAnalyzer requires contacting sales for pricing, while the Splunk add-on is free but necessitates an investment in Splunk itself.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free add-on, requires Splunk licensing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free add-on, requires Splunk licensing
Large
Contact for pricing
Free add-on, requires Splunk licensing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free add-on, requires Splunk licensing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCAnalyzer or Splunk TA-DMARC add-on?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCAnalyzer vs Splunk TA-DMARC add-on DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped