DMARC Digests by Postmark focuses exclusively on DMARC reporting, delivering simple, actionable insights. We found it excels at presenting a clear overview of your email authentication status and identifying email sources.
Its strength lies in making DMARC accessible to users who might not be deep into email security. It provides an easy-to-digest summary, helping us quickly understand legitimate and fraudulent email sending patterns without getting bogged down in raw data.
Report-URI is a broader security reporting platform, encompassing not just DMARC but also Content Security Policy (CSP), Referrer-Policy, Expect-CT, and other security headers. For DMARC, it offers highly granular data and extensive filtering capabilities.
We've experienced its power in allowing us to dive deep into every single DMARC report, customize views, and set up sophisticated data analysis. It caters to users who need comprehensive control and insight across multiple security policies.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Using DMARC Digests is remarkably straightforward. The interface is clean, intuitive, and designed to minimize complexity. We appreciate that it distills complex DMARC data into easy-to-understand digests and visual summaries.
Setup is simple, and daily or weekly digest emails keep us informed without needing to constantly check a dashboard. It's an excellent choice for teams that prefer simplicity and automation over intricate dashboards.
Report-URI offers a powerful but more technical user experience. Its dashboard can initially feel overwhelming due to the sheer amount of data and configuration options available. We've found that it requires a steeper learning curve.
However, once you get the hang of its filters and custom views, the level of detail and control is exceptional. It's built for power users and security professionals who need to drill down into raw reports and manage multiple security policies.
Which product has the best support
Support
DMARC Digests by Postmark emphasizes friendly human support, which aligns with their user-friendly approach. Our experience suggests a focus on guiding users through DMARC implementation and resolving any common issues they might face.
For a product designed for ease of use, having accessible and responsive human support is a significant advantage, particularly for those new to DMARC.
Report-URI provides extensive documentation, FAQs, and a knowledge base, which we found invaluable for navigating its comprehensive features. For more complex issues, direct support is typically available via email.
Given its technical depth, a self-service approach with thorough documentation is essential, empowering users to find solutions independently, though direct assistance is there when needed.
Who should use each product
Suitability
DMARC Digests is an excellent choice for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and individual users looking for a straightforward DMARC monitoring solution. It's ideal for those who need clear guidance without deep technical expertise. We find it perfect for getting DMARC set up correctly and maintained.
However, for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) managing numerous clients or large enterprises with complex infrastructures and advanced security requirements, its simplicity might be a limitation. It doesn't offer the multi-tenancy or extensive API integration typically required in those environments.
Report-URI is well-suited for enterprises, security teams, and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who require in-depth security reporting beyond just DMARC. Its comprehensive feature set and granular control make it invaluable for environments with diverse security policies.
Small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) might find Report-URI's complexity and feature richness to be overkill for their needs. It's best for organizations with dedicated security staff who can leverage its advanced filtering and customization options.
How does DMARC Digests by Postmark compare with Report-URI?
DMARC report analysis
How detailed and accessible is the DMARC report analysis?
Simplified digest reports
Comprehensive, detailed reports
Source detection
Ability to identify email sending sources clearly.
Identifies known sources clearly
Granular source attribution
Forward detection
Capability to distinguish email forwards from direct sends.
Basic, may group forwards
Advanced detection and classification
Spoof detection
Identifies email spoofing attempts.
Yes
Yes
Notifications and alerts
System for alerting users about DMARC issues.
Daily/weekly digests
Customizable alerts (email, webhook)
Reporting
Types and customizability of reports.
Summary views
Customizable data views, raw data access
API
Availability of an Application Programming Interface for integration.
No
Yes
Multi-tenancy
Ability to manage multiple domains or client accounts.
No (per domain billing)
Yes (multiple projects/clients)
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record lookup limits.
No
No
Hosted DMARC
Provides a managed DMARC record service.
No
No
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
No
Yes (BIMI report monitoring)
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT.
No
Yes (TLS-RPT monitoring)
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of email blocklists or sender reputation.
No
No
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC configuration or analysis.
No
No
DNS monitoring
Monitors general DNS health beyond DMARC records.
No (specific to DMARC records)
No (specific to security headers)
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own servers.
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free option.
14-day free trial
Limited free tier
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
DMARC Digests by Postmark's primary drawback is its limited feature set for advanced users and large organizations. While its simplicity is a strength, it means sacrificing granular control, API access, and multi-tenancy. Report-URI, on the other hand, can be overwhelming for new users due to its extensive (and sometimes complex) interface and broader focus beyond just DMARC, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
5 / 5(1)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Monitoring for PROs
5.0 / 5
What do you like best about Report URI?
What I like the most about New Relic is how easy it is instal the trackers on the different well know servers and systems like Apache, AWS, S3 Object etc. The visualisation is the live data are great.
What do you dislike about Report URI?
Sometimes it is difficult to delete a tracker if it still detects trafic. You can't delete them if the tracker continues to receive records - something that happens regularly when we have used CDN networks
Recommendations to others considering Report URI:
Use the correct version of the tracker for your specific system
What problems is Report URI solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solved the live monitoring problem and extra expenses for monitoring softwares that monitor the health and the responsiveness of our services and platforms. It is also connected with Atlassian Statuspage which give a better performance view for our clients.
Vasilis Filippos S.
Web Developer Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a single, clear pricing tier per domain, whereas Report-URI's pricing structure is less transparent but includes a free tier and caters to broader security needs.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
$14/month/domain
Free tier available
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
$14/month/domain
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
$14/month/domain
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
$14/month/domain
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with DMARC Digests by Postmark or Report-URI?
0 / 5(0)
