Suped

DMARC Digests by Postmark vs MailHardener

Choose Postmark if you need simple, single-domain monitoring; choose MailHardener for comprehensive features and MSP solutions.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
When we dive into DMARC Digests by Postmark, we find a streamlined tool focused on the core task: DMARC reporting. It's designed to give you a clear, digestible overview of your DMARC compliance, showing you who's sending email on your behalf and whether it's legitimate.
The platform provides an easy way to see how your email sources are performing against your DMARC policy. It's particularly good for those who want to get DMARC set up quickly and start receiving actionable insights without getting bogged down in an overwhelming array of advanced features.
MailHardener, on the other hand, presents a much broader suite of email security features beyond just DMARC. While its DMARC reporting is robust, it also integrates SPF, DKIM, BIMI, MTA-STS, and even blocklist monitoring into a single dashboard. This comprehensive approach means you're not just monitoring DMARC, but actively hardening your entire email sending infrastructure.
We found MailHardener offers more granular control and advanced configuration options, which is beneficial for organizations with complex email environments or those looking to implement a full spectrum of email security protocols. Its focus extends to actively protecting against various email threats, not just reporting on them.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a very clean and intuitive user interface. It focuses on simplicity, making it easy for anyone, regardless of their DMARC expertise, to understand their email authentication status. The dashboards are straightforward, presenting key metrics and insights without unnecessary clutter.
The setup process is quick, guiding you through the necessary DNS record configuration with clear instructions. We appreciate how it distills complex DMARC data into easily digestible reports, making it less intimidating for newcomers to email security. It truly lives up to its name, providing 'digests'.
MailHardener's user experience is designed for more technical users, offering a detailed and powerful dashboard. While it's still well-organized, the sheer depth of features means there's a steeper learning curve compared to Postmark's simpler offering. We found its interface allows for extensive customization and drill-down capabilities, which is excellent for those who need precise control.
The setup process for MailHardener, given its broader feature set, naturally involves more steps, especially if you're configuring SPF flattening, BIMI, or MTA-STS. However, for those who value comprehensive visibility and advanced security configurations, its structured approach is highly effective once you get the hang of it.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Postmark is renowned for its excellent customer support, and DMARC Digests benefits from this reputation. We've experienced their support to be responsive and knowledgeable, particularly when it comes to understanding DMARC reports and troubleshooting basic configuration issues. They offer 'friendly human support' as part of their package, which is a significant plus.
Their support channels typically include email and in-app chat. Given the more focused nature of DMARC Digests, the support team is well-equipped to handle the scope of the product effectively. For anyone new to DMARC, having reliable and friendly assistance is invaluable.
MailHardener also provides solid customer support, particularly given the complexity and breadth of its features. We found their documentation to be thorough, which is often the first line of defense for a product with so many advanced settings. For more intricate queries, their support team is technically proficient.
Their support is well-suited for users who might need help with a wider range of email security protocols beyond just DMARC. While perhaps not as overtly 'friendly' as Postmark's marketing suggests, it is certainly professional and effective in resolving issues related to SPF, DKIM, BIMI, and other integrated services.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Digests by Postmark is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and individual developers who need a straightforward DMARC monitoring solution. If you're managing a few domains and primarily want to ensure DMARC compliance and detect spoofing, this product fits the bill perfectly.
It's less suited for managed service providers (MSPs) or large enterprises that require multi-tenancy, a wider array of email security features, or deep customization. Its simplicity is its strength, but also its limitation for complex environments. It is not designed for MSPs or enterprise-level deployment.
MailHardener is an excellent choice for enterprises, IT professionals, and managed service providers (MSPs) who need a comprehensive email security suite. Its multi-tenancy capabilities make it highly suitable for MSPs managing multiple client domains, and its extensive feature set addresses complex security requirements.
SMBs looking for more than just DMARC reporting, such as SPF flattening, BIMI management, and MTA-STS, will also find MailHardener compelling. While it has a free tier, its full power is unlocked for organizations with more advanced security needs and larger scale operations.

How does DMARC Digests by Postmark compare with MailHardener?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Digests by Postmark, while excellent for its simplicity, might feel too basic for organizations needing more than just DMARC reporting. Its single-domain, single-price model may not scale efficiently for businesses with numerous domains or complex email architectures. We also noted the absence of advanced features like SPF flattening, BIMI, or blocklist monitoring, which are crucial for a holistic email security posture. MailHardener, conversely, can be overwhelming for users new to email security due to its extensive feature set and more technical interface. While robust, this complexity means a steeper learning curve, and some SMBs might find themselves paying for features they don't fully utilize or understand, making it potentially less cost-effective for simpler needs.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a simple, flat-rate per domain, while MailHardener provides a tiered structure with a free option and specialized MSP pricing.
Logo
Logo
Small
$14.00 per domain
Free tier
Medium
$14.00 per domain
Standard plan (EUR)
Large
$14.00 per domain
Large plan (EUR)
Enterprise
$14.00 per domain
MSP plans (Contact)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Digests by Postmark or MailHardener?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions