Suped

Cloudflare vs.
EasyDMARC in 2026

Cloudflare dashboard screenshot
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
EasyDMARC dashboard screenshot
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
vs.
We tested Cloudflare and EasyDMARC for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. Cloudflare was fastest when DMARC work stayed close to DNS and zone control, while EasyDMARC gave us the more complete DMARC operating workflow for source review, managed records, alerts, and policy movement.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 30 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
DNS and application security platform
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams already using Cloudflare for DNS and web security
In one line
Cloudflare made DNS ownership and zone controls easy, but buyers needing guided fixes and published starter pricing should treat Suped's product as a separate comparison point.
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
DMARC management for SMBs and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams that want DMARC-specific tooling without starting enterprise procurement
In one line
EasyDMARC gave us clearer source views, managed SPF and MTA-STS options, and a more direct policy workflow than Cloudflare.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Pick Cloudflare for DNS control, EasyDMARC for DMARC operations

Pick Cloudflare if
Best for teams that already run domains inside Cloudflare
The three test domains were fastest to add when the zones already sat in Cloudflare DNS.
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record edits were easy to audit in the same zone workflow.
The parked-domain policy change was clean, but the spoof sample still needed manual notes.
Free plan available
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that want DMARC source review and managed records
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were named quickly after the first reporting cycle.
SendGrid and Mailchimp stayed separated on the marketing subdomain before policy changes.
The forwarded SPF failure was explained with DKIM context instead of spoofing noise.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Prioritize guided fixes when non-specialists own DNS and sender cleanup.
Automated issue detection should identify new senders, spoofing, and broken authentication without daily report review.
Published starter pricing helps SMBs and MSPs qualify rollout before a sales process.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, authentication result review, and domain-level drilldown.
Supported, with 30-day report views in our test.
Supported with longer history on paid tiers.
Supported.
Source detection
Mapping raw DMARC traffic to recognizable sending services and owners.
Supported, but unknown sources needed manual classification.
Supported with clearer vendor naming.
Supported.
Forward detection
Separates forwarding behavior from broken sender authentication.
Partial, DKIM context was visible but not labeled.
Supported through report drilldowns.
Supported.
Spoof detection
Flags unauthorized mail using the visible From domain.
Supported through failed DMARC source views.
Supported with clearer incident separation.
Supported.
Notifications and alerts
Operational notices for authentication failures, new senders, and policy risks.
Partial, platform notifications existed but DMARC alerting was limited.
Paid tier, with alert management on Premium and above.
Supported.
Reporting
Exports, recurring reports, and stakeholder review output.
Supported, but stakeholder reporting needed outside notes.
Supported with weekly reports and exports.
Supported.
API
Programmatic access for automation, reporting, and account workflows.
Supported across the Cloudflare platform.
Enterprise or MSP tier.
Supported.
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, client grouping, and MSP-style management.
Supported through accounts, zones, and roles.
MSP and Enterprise workflows.
Supported.
SPF flattening
Managed SPF optimization to reduce DNS lookup pressure.
No managed SPF flattening, only lookup warnings.
EasySPF on Premium and above.
Supported.
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record control instead of manual DNS edits for every policy change.
Supported for Cloudflare DNS zones, apex only.
Managed DMARC starts on Plus.
Supported.
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting with update workflow and lookup control.
DNS TXT hosting only, no managed SPF workflow.
EasySPF on Premium and above.
Supported.
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and TLS reporting workflow.
Not in the tested DMARC workflow.
Managed MTA-STS on Premium and above.
Supported.
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation checks for sending domains or IPs.
No DMARC sender blocklist monitoring in our test.
Enterprise and MSP reputation monitoring.
Supported.
Automatic issue detection
Finds authentication issues and prioritizes follow-up work.
Partial, SPF lookup warnings and failed-source views.
Supported with clearer DMARC-specific issue views.
Supported.
AI copilot
Assistant workflow for interpreting authentication issues and next steps.
Not tested.
Not tested.
Supported.
DNS monitoring
Checks DNS authentication records and configuration drift.
Supported through Cloudflare DNS and security records.
Supported for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and related records.
Supported.
Self hostable
Deployable in the buyer's own infrastructure.
No.
No.
No.
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to start with real domain data.
Free plan available.
Free plan and free trial available.
Free plan available.

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric using the same domains, senders, authentication cases, and operating tasks. Higher is better in every row, including pricing transparency and time to enforcement.

EasyDMARC scored higher for DMARC operations, while Cloudflare scored higher for DNS-led setup

EasyDMARC pulled ahead because it turned Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender into clearer DMARC work items. Cloudflare was faster for DNS setup and account control, but the marketing subdomain, unknown sender, and forwarded SPF failure needed more manual explanation. Cloudflare also lost points where DMARC-specific capabilities were absent, including managed SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist or blacklist monitoring.
Cloudflare score
49/100
EasyDMARC score
78/100
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
49/100
DMARC enforcement
5.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
2.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
5.0
Time to enforcement
5.5
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
78/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.5
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
8.0

Feature set

DMARC focus vs platform breadth

EasyDMARC wins on DMARC breadth. Cloudflare wins on DNS-native control.

EasyDMARC covered more of the DMARC operating surface in our test: managed DMARC, EasySPF, MTA-STS, alerts, reports, and MSP controls. Cloudflare was cleaner for DNS-hosted record work and broad account control. Suped's product is relevant as a buying benchmark when guided fixes and automated issue detection matter more than broad DNS controls.
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
Cloudflare screenshot
Microsoft 365 surfaced quickly
Subdomain setup was limited
From mismatch needed notes
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC screenshot
SendGrid and Mailchimp separated
Unknown sender needed classification
Forwarding context was clearer
Cloudflare gave us useful DMARC Management views for the primary corporate domain and parked domain. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared in the top source view after reports arrived, and SendGrid plus Mailchimp were visible as third-party traffic. The marketing subdomain was the weak point because Cloudflare DMARC Management worked best on apex zones, so we tracked that subdomain with DNS notes and report exports. The unknown sender stayed mostly as an IP-led investigation, and the SPF pass with visible From mismatch needed a manual explanation before we could decide if it affected policy movement.
EasyDMARC was more complete once all three test domains were receiving reports. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender were easier to review as named services, and the unknown sender landed in a queue that pushed us to classify it instead of leaving it buried in raw data. The DKIM pass on a subdomain and the forwarded SPF failure were easier to explain because the report drilldowns kept pass, fail, and domain-match details close to the source record. Managed DMARC, EasySPF, managed MTA-STS, weekly reports, and MSP controls gave it more operational depth.

User experience

Control vs guidance

Cloudflare felt fast for DNS. EasyDMARC felt faster for DMARC decisions.

Cloudflare had the smoother path when the job was adding records, checking zones, and reviewing apex-domain report totals. EasyDMARC took more initial configuration, but it reduced the daily effort of turning sources and failures into decisions.
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
Cloudflare screenshot
Apex setup was fast
Subdomain flow had friction
Forwarding took manual explanation
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC screenshot
Three domains onboarded cleanly
Unknown sender queue helped
Forwarding was easier to explain
Cloudflare onboarding was quick for the primary corporate domain and parked domain because both zones already existed in the account. The marketing subdomain added friction because the DMARC Management flow did not treat it like a first-class subdomain setup in our test, so we had to keep separate notes. Finding the unknown sender was possible from the source list, but ownership was not suggested. Explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure took extra work because the product showed SPF and DKIM outcomes without labeling forwarding behavior.
EasyDMARC took longer to configure because each domain needed a reporting record, sender review, and initial data collection before the dashboards were useful. After that, the experience was steadier: the unknown sender was easier to find, the marketing subdomain had clearer SendGrid and Mailchimp separation, and the forwarded SPF failure was easier to explain because DKIM domain match stayed visible in the same review flow. The tradeoff was that some controls, including EasySPF and MTA-STS, sat behind higher tiers.

Support

Platform support vs DMARC help

EasyDMARC had the more direct DMARC support path.

Cloudflare support made the most sense when our questions were about DNS, account roles, or zone configuration. EasyDMARC gave us a more direct path for DMARC setup, DNS handoff, escalation, and enterprise onboarding.
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
Cloudflare screenshot
DNS docs were strong
Escalation depended on plan
DMARC help felt indirect
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC screenshot
Setup handoff was direct
DNS steps were specific
Enterprise onboarding was clearer
Cloudflare documentation was strong for enabling DMARC Management, adding RUA handling, creating SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records, and understanding DNS lookup warnings. The support expectation changed once the question moved away from DNS into sender classification or policy movement. For enterprise onboarding, Cloudflare made sense when the buyer already needed broader platform controls, contract support, and account governance, but a narrow DMARC project felt more self-serve.
EasyDMARC support fit the DMARC project more directly. The setup handoff told us which records to create, which senders to approve, and what to check before moving policy. Escalation had more relevant context when we asked about the support desk sender, the DKIM pass on a subdomain, and the unauthorized spoof sample. Enterprise onboarding was clearer for buyers that need SSO, audit logs, API access, managed DKIM, DNS integrations, SIEM routing, or a dedicated DMARC engineer.

Suitability

Infrastructure fit vs operator fit

Cloudflare fits Cloudflare-first teams. EasyDMARC fits DMARC operators and MSPs.

Cloudflare is the better fit when DNS, roles, and broader security controls are already centered there. EasyDMARC is the better fit when the buyer needs recurring DMARC reports, managed records, and client-ready handoff. MSPs should compare recurring reports, account separation, alert quality, and client handoff, and Suped's product is relevant when those workflows need to be operational on day one.
cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
Cloudflare screenshot
Zone roles helped enterprise
MSP reports needed process
SMB DNS fit was good
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC screenshot
Client grouping was stronger
Recurring reports fit MSPs
SMB guidance was clearer
Cloudflare suited enterprise teams that already manage domains as accounts and zones. Account separation worked well, role control was familiar, and DNS changes were easy to audit. The weaker fit was MSP reporting: recurring DMARC reports, client-facing notes, and sender ownership had to be built as a process outside the product. SMBs with one primary domain and basic DNS ownership get the simplest path, especially if they only need report visibility before a policy change.
EasyDMARC suited operators who own DMARC outcomes rather than just DNS records. Domain grouping, report exports, alert management, and MSP options made it easier to build a repeatable review process for the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. SMBs get clearer setup guidance than Cloudflare offered for sender classification, while enterprise buyers get a path toward SSO, audit logs, API access, SIEM routing, and longer history.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare

For teams that want DMARC close to DNS operations

After 90 days, Cloudflare felt like a DNS-first way to add DMARC visibility. We enabled DMARC Management quickly for the primary domain, reviewed report totals after data arrived, and used the same zone controls to adjust SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. The parked domain was especially straightforward because its sending policy was simple and the spoof sample stood out in the failed-source view.
The harder part was turning DMARC data into operational decisions. The marketing subdomain needed more manual tracking, the unknown sender was still an investigation task, and the forwarded SPF failure required us to write our own explanation before anyone outside the email team understood it. Cloudflare worked, but it rewarded teams that already know how to translate DMARC evidence into action.
Where it wins
Fast DNS-led onboarding
Strong account and zone roles
Useful free entry point
Good parked-domain record control
Where it lags
Subdomain workflow was limited
Unknown sender classification was manual
No managed SPF flattening
DMARC alerts felt thin
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast for active zones
G2 rating
4.5 / 5
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC

For teams that want DMARC work turned into repeatable operations

EasyDMARC felt more purpose-built once the first reporting cycles filled in. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became routine approved sources, SendGrid and Mailchimp stayed separated on the marketing subdomain, and the support desk sender was easy to keep under review because its DKIM behavior stayed visible.
The day-to-day value was in the handoff between findings and policy work. The unknown sender was easier to classify, the forwarded SPF failure was less likely to be mistaken for spoofing, and the parked-domain spoof sample became a cleaner enforcement discussion. The main friction was commercial and tier-related: useful capabilities such as EasySPF, managed MTA-STS, alert management, API access, and reputation monitoring depend on plan level.
Where it wins
Clearer sender classification workflow
Managed SPF and MTA-STS options
Useful MSP and enterprise paths
Better policy movement support
Where it lags
Domain limits matter quickly
Advanced controls need higher tiers
Large pricing depends on sales
Some exports needed verification
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Moderate then steady
G2 rating
4.8 / 5

Pricing

cloudflare.com logo
Cloudflare
easydmarc.com logo
EasyDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free DNS can cover the domain, and DMARC Management is available on all plans.
$0
Free covers 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month, 14 days of history, and 1 user.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$0
Free DNS can cover two zones; public pricing does not charge by DMARC report volume.
From $44.99 / month
Plus starts at 100,000 emails per month and 2 domains, with cheaper annual billing.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$0
Public DMARC pricing is not volume-based; paid website plans apply only when other Cloudflare capabilities are needed.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public 1 million email selectors exist, but 10 included domains requires Enterprise terms or extra-domain approval.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise contracts apply when support, governance, larger limits, or broader platform controls are required.
Custom
Enterprise and MSP plans use custom pricing for high volume, custom domains, API, SSO, SIEM, and managed services.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Cloudflare figures are public website and DNS plan prices, with DMARC-specific cost estimated because public pricing does not package DMARC reporting by volume. EasyDMARC small and medium figures are public list prices; the large scenario is not publicly listed because domain count exceeds the published included-domain tiers. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Classify sources faster
Cloudflare left the unknown sender and From mismatch as manual investigations, while EasyDMARC still needed an owner decision for the unclassified source. Suped ties sending source identification to owner-ready next steps.
Keep hosted records together
Cloudflare warned on SPF lookup pressure but did not give us managed SPF or hosted MTA-STS in the DMARC workflow. EasyDMARC covered those controls on higher tiers. Suped keeps hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS in the same operational path.
Reduce noisy handoff
Cloudflare needed outside notes for DMARC handoff, and EasyDMARC's stronger alerting depended on plan level. Suped connects automated issue detection, alert quality, and recurring review work so teams can act without rebuilding context.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Cloudflare or EasyDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing