Suped

Centera DMARC Compliance vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose Centera if you need a managed solution, choose Techsneeze for a self-hosted, open-source tool.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance offers a full suite of features designed for comprehensive DMARC management. We found its capabilities extend far beyond basic reporting, providing advanced analytics, detailed source identification, and robust policy enforcement tools. It aims to simplify the complex aspects of DMARC.
The platform integrates additional security measures like BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT, alongside critical reputation monitoring functionalities. It's built to give users a panoramic view of their email ecosystem, allowing for proactive identification and remediation of authentication issues and potential spoofing attempts.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, as an open-source tool, focuses primarily on the fundamental task of parsing DMARC aggregate (RUA) reports. It's a straightforward utility that takes raw XML reports and presents them in a more digestible, graphical format. Its feature set is minimalist by design, concentrating on visualization rather than active management or advanced analytics.
We observed that while it effectively displays DMARC results, it lacks features such as direct source management, real-time alerts, or integration with other email security protocols. Users should consider it a foundational viewing tool rather than a comprehensive DMARC compliance platform.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance provides a polished and intuitive user interface. From our experience, navigating through reports, configuring policies, and accessing detailed analytics is generally smooth. The dashboard offers a quick overview, and drill-down capabilities are well-implemented, allowing for efficient investigation of email streams.
Despite its extensive feature set, the complexity is managed effectively through thoughtful design. We found the learning curve reasonable for users familiar with email security concepts, and the guided setup processes help in getting started quickly.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer offers a very basic, functional interface. As a self-hosted, open-source tool, its design prioritizes utility over aesthetics or advanced user workflows. We found it relatively simple to get raw DMARC data displayed, but customization options or interactive elements are limited.
The user experience is largely dictated by the user's technical proficiency in setting up and managing a web server and database. Once installed, it performs its core function adequately, but users expecting a slick SaaS-like experience might find it rudimentary, as it lacks many modern UI conveniences.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance, being a commercial product, offers structured support channels. We anticipate users would have access to dedicated customer support teams, likely through email, phone, or a ticketing system. This is crucial for businesses that require timely assistance with complex DMARC deployments or troubleshooting.
Based on our understanding of commercial DMARC solutions, Centera would typically provide onboarding assistance, documentation, and ongoing support to help users optimize their DMARC posture and resolve any deliverability issues. This managed approach ensures that help is readily available when needed.
Support for Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is community-driven. As an open-source project, official dedicated support is not part of the package. Users rely on documentation, online forums, and their own technical expertise to implement and troubleshoot the viewer. This means that problem-solving often requires a significant investment of time and internal resources.
While the open-source community can be helpful, it's not a guaranteed, immediate response channel. For organizations without strong internal IT or email security expertise, this model can pose significant challenges when encountering installation hurdles or parsing errors.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance is best suited for organizations that require a managed, full-featured DMARC solution with dedicated support. This includes larger enterprises with complex email infrastructures, and SMBs that prefer a 'set it and forget it' approach to DMARC implementation and monitoring. We also see it as ideal for MSPs (managed service providers) who need to manage DMARC for multiple clients efficiently.
Its comprehensive feature set, including advanced reporting, API access, and supplementary email security protocols, makes it a strong contender for those prioritizing robust protection and streamlined management. Companies needing multi-tenancy or extensive automation will find Centera to be a strong fit.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is a strong option for highly technical users or organizations with specific requirements for self-hosting and full control over their data. This includes smaller businesses (SMBs) with strong internal IT capabilities and limited budgets, or individual users who want to understand DMARC reports without commercial software dependencies.
It is not typically suitable for MSPs due to the lack of multi-tenancy and dedicated support, nor for large enterprises that often require advanced features and vendor-backed SLAs. If you enjoy tinkering with servers and databases, and value open-source freedom, this could be for you.

How does Centera DMARC Compliance compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Centera DMARC Compliance, while comprehensive, may present a steeper learning curve for new DMARC users due to its extensive features. Its robust nature also means it will come with a higher price tag than a free tool. On the other hand, Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer's primary drawback is its limited functionality and the requirement for users to self-host and maintain the solution, which can be a significant technical burden. It completely lacks many advanced features that are standard in commercial offerings.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Centera DMARC Compliance requires contacting their sales team for specific pricing, whereas Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is free to use but incurs self-hosting costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-host costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Centera DMARC Compliance or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions