Agari Brand Protection is known for its advanced threat detection capabilities, extending far beyond basic DMARC enforcement. It integrates robust brand protection and anti-phishing features, providing deep insights into potential email threats and sender reputation. This platform is designed to handle intricate email ecosystems.
We found Agari to be a very robust system, capable of supporting complex configurations. It's often chosen by larger organizations with dedicated security teams due to its comprehensive suite of tools for preventing impersonation and various forms of email fraud.
Centera DMARC Compliance focuses specifically on core DMARC implementation and monitoring. It provides a clear and concise dashboard designed for straightforward reporting and policy enforcement. The emphasis here is on simplicity and ease of use for managing DMARC.
Our experience showed Centera delivers on its promise of fundamental DMARC management without introducing unnecessary complexity. It provides essential tools to help organizations achieve and maintain DMARC compliance efficiently.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
While powerful, Agari Brand Protection can present a steep learning curve for new users due to its extensive features and granular control options. Navigating its various modules and understanding the advanced analytics requires a significant investment of time.
For seasoned security professionals, however, this depth is a clear advantage, allowing for precise policy tuning and detailed threat analysis. We found that onboarding with Agari typically requires dedicated attention and expertise to fully leverage its capabilities.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers a more intuitive and simpler interface, making DMARC implementation and ongoing monitoring relatively straightforward. The dashboards are designed for clarity, and the reporting is easy to digest, which is beneficial for those who aren't deep email security experts.
We appreciated its user-friendly design, which focuses on presenting essential DMARC data without overwhelming the user. While it might not offer the same depth of customization as more complex platforms, its ease of use is a definite strong point for its target audience.
Which product has the best support
Support
Agari's support team is generally knowledgeable, but users have noted that response times can sometimes be a little slow, particularly for less critical issues. For complex enterprise deployments, securing dedicated account management is often crucial for successful integration.
We found that while the expertise was there, the initial response times varied. Organizations considering Agari should factor in potential needs for dedicated support resources, especially when dealing with advanced configurations or urgent security incidents.
With fewer public reviews available, our direct experience with Centera suggests that their support is adequate for the scope of their product. Interactions tend to be focused on DMARC-specific issues, which are generally less intricate than the broader security challenges Agari addresses.
We found the available documentation helpful for common queries, and for a product with a simpler feature set, this level of support is usually sufficient. Organizations with straightforward DMARC needs will likely find Centera's support responsive enough.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Agari Brand Protection is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with sophisticated email security needs, particularly those facing high volumes of advanced phishing and brand impersonation attacks. Its comprehensive suite is ideal for integrating DMARC into a broader, multi-layered security strategy.
It is highly suitable for enterprise environments that demand extensive customization and deep threat intelligence. For MSPs, managing Agari across multiple clients requires significant specialized expertise. It might be an overkill for most SMBs who only need basic DMARC compliance.
Centera DMARC Compliance is a good fit for SMBs and mid-sized organizations seeking a dedicated and manageable DMARC compliance solution without the overhead and complexity of a full-scale email security platform. It provides the essential tools for effective DMARC enforcement.
It is very suitable for SMBs and mid-market companies looking for a clear path to DMARC implementation. While effective, it might lack some advanced integrations and broader threat protection features that larger enterprises require. For MSPs, it offers a solid, if somewhat basic, DMARC management option for clients.
How does Agari Brand Protection compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse and visualize DMARC aggregate reports.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.
Forward detection
Handles forwarded emails without breaking DMARC authentication.
Spoof detection
Advanced capabilities to detect brand impersonation and spoofing.
Notifications and alerts
Provides real-time alerts for policy violations or suspicious activity.
Reporting
Comprehensive dashboards and customizable reports.
API
Offers an API for integration with other security tools.
Available for extensive integrations.
Limited or no public API for integration.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple domains or clients from a single interface.
Designed for large-scale management.
Supports multiple domains.
SPF flattening
Reduces the number of DNS lookups for SPF records.
Included as part of advanced features.
Not a primary feature.
Hosted DMARC
Provides DNS hosting for DMARC records.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Included in brand protection suite.
Not typically supported.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Advanced security protocol support.
Generally not a focus.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors blocklists (blacklists) and sender reputation.
Strong focus on sender reputation management.
Not a core DMARC feature.
AI copilot
Leverages AI for automated insights or assistance.
Does not explicitly feature an AI copilot.
Does not explicitly feature an AI copilot.
DNS monitoring
Comprehensive monitoring of DNS records beyond DMARC.
Part of a broader security platform.
Primarily focused on DMARC DNS.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on-premises.
Cloud-based solution.
Cloud-based solution.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or a permanently free usage tier.
No public free trial or tier.
No public free trial or tier.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Agari Brand Protection, while powerful, can be overwhelming in its complexity and configuration, especially for teams without dedicated email security expertise. The reported slow support response times might also be a concern for some organizations. Centera DMARC Compliance, in contrast, is simpler but this means it lacks the advanced features, broader threat intelligence, and deep integration capabilities that larger enterprises often require. Its focused approach means it won't address email security issues beyond core DMARC.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection?
I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic.
What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection?
The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further.
What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Both Agari Brand Protection and Centera DMARC Compliance require direct contact for pricing, indicating tailored solutions rather than publicly listed tiers.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Agari Brand Protection or Centera DMARC Compliance?
4 / 5(1)
